Literature DB >> 29544607

Bivalirudin or Heparin in Patients Undergoing Invasive Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Giuseppe Gargiulo1, Greta Carrara2, Enrico Frigoli3, Pascal Vranckx4, Sergio Leonardi5, Nestor Ciociano6, Gianluca Campo7, Ferdinando Varbella8, Paolo Calabrò9, Stefano Garducci10, Alessandro Iannone11, Carlo Briguori12, Giuseppe Andò13, Gabriele Crimi14, Ugo Limbruno15, Roberto Garbo16, Paolo Sganzerla17, Filippo Russo18, Alessandro Lupi19, Bernardo Cortese20, Arturo Ausiello21, Salvatore Ierna22, Giovanni Esposito23, Dennis Zavalloni24, Andrea Santarelli25, Gennaro Sardella26, Simone Tresoldi27, Nicoletta de Cesare28, Alessandro Sciahbasi29, Antonio Zingarelli30, Paolo Tosi31, Arnoud van 't Hof32, Elmir Omerovic33, Salvatore Brugaletta34, Stephan Windecker3, Marco Valgimigli35.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrasting evidence exists on the comparative efficacy and safety of bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in relation to the planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs).
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with UFH with or without GPIs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent invasive management.
METHODS: In the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX) program, 7,213 patients were randomly assigned to receive either bivalirudin or UFH with or without GPIs at discretion of the operator. The 30-day coprimary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), and net adverse clinical events (NACEs) (a composite of MACEs or major bleeding).
RESULTS: Among 3,603 patients assigned to receive UFH, 781 (21.7%) underwent planned treatment with GPI before coronary intervention. Bailout use of GPIs was similar between the bivalirudin and UFH groups (4.5% and 5.4%) (p = 0.11). At 30 days, the 2 coprimary endpoints of MACEs and NACEs, as well as individual endpoints of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or stroke did not differ among the 3 groups after adjustment. Compared with the UFH and UFH+GPI groups, bivalirudin reduced bleeding, mainly the most severe bleeds, including fatal and nonaccess site-related events, as well as transfusion rates and the need for surgical access site repair. These findings were not influenced by the administered intraprocedural dose of UFH and were confirmed at multiple sensitivity analyses, including the randomly allocated access site.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS, the rates of MACEs and NACEs were not significantly lower with bivalirudin than with UFH, irrespective of planned GPI use. However, bivalirudin significantly reduced bleeding complications, mainly those not related to access site, irrespective of planned use of GPIs. (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX [MATRIX]; NCT01433627).
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor; MATRIX; acute coronary syndrome; bivalirudin; heparin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29544607     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Comprehensive safety profile evaluation of bivalirudin in Chinese ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, multicenter, intensive monitoring study.

Authors:  Haijun Zheng; Zhonghua Wang; Qi Li; Yingxin Zhao; Yin Liu; Aiming Chen; Jianping Deng; Guohai Su
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.174

2.  Clinical outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Xiaochun Zhang; Qinchun Jin; Dehong Kong; Cuizhen Pan; Xian Zhang; Dan Zhou; Zhiyun Shen; Daxin Zhou; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  A call for action in bleeding prevention.

Authors:  Felice Gragnano; Negar Manavifar; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Hiten Patel; Rana Garris; Suchit Bhutani; Priyank Shah; Upamanyu Rampal; Rahul Vasudev; Gabriel Melki; Bader Abu Ghalyoun; Hartaj Virk; Mahesh Bikkina; Fayez Shamoon
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2019-10-04

5.  The efficacy and safety of Hirudin plus Aspirin versus Warfarin in the secondary prevention of Cardioembolic Stroke due to Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chang-Geng Song; Li-Jie Bi; Jing-Jing Zhao; Xuan Wang; Wen Li; Fang Yang; Wen Jiang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Efficacy and safety of next-generation tick transcriptome-derived direct thrombin inhibitors.

Authors:  Cho Yeow Koh; Norrapat Shih; Christina Y C Yip; Aaron Wei Liang Li; Weiming Chen; Fathiah S Amran; Esther Jia En Leong; Janaki Krishnamoorthy Iyer; Grace Croft; Muhammad Ibrahim Bin Mazlan; Yen-Lin Chee; Eng-Soo Yap; Dougald M Monroe; Maureane Hoffman; Richard C Becker; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Vaishali Verma; Amita Gupta; Vijay K Chaudhary; A Mark Richards; R Manjunatha Kini; Mark Y Chan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Influence of Direct Thrombin Inhibitor and Low Molecular Weight Heparin on Platelet Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Interventional Trial.

Authors:  Flávia B B Arantes; Fernando R Menezes; Andre Franci; Carlos J D G Barbosa; Talia F Dalçoquio; Carlos A K Nakashima; Luciano M Baracioli; Remo H M Furtado; Quintiliano S S Nomelini; José A F Ramires; Roberto Kalil Filho; José C Nicolau
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Reperfusion After Fibrinolytic Therapy (RAFT): An open-label, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of bivalirudin versus heparin in rescue percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Amir Faour; Nicholas Collins; Trent Williams; Arshad Khan; Craig P Juergens; Sidney Lo; Darren L Walters; Derek P Chew; John K French
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.