Literature DB >> 29543830

Dynamic minimum set problem for reserve design: Heuristic solutions for large problems.

Mathieu Bonneau1,2, Régis Sabbadin3, Fred A Johnson4, Bradley Stith4.   

Abstract

Conversion of wild habitats to human dominated landscape is a major cause of biodiversity loss. An approach to mitigate the impact of habitat loss consists of designating reserves where habitat is preserved and managed. Determining the most valuable areas to preserve in a landscape is called the reserve design problem. There exists several possible formulations of the reserve design problem, depending on the objectives and the constraints. In this article, we considered the dynamic problem of designing a reserve that contains a desired area of several key habitats. The dynamic case implies that the reserve cannot be designed in one time step, due to budget constraints, and that habitats can be lost before they are reserved, due for example to climate change or human development. We proposed two heuristics strategies that can be used to select sites to reserve each year for large reserve design problem. The first heuristic is a combination of the Marxan and site-ordering algorithms and the second heuristic is an augmented version of the common naive myopic heuristic. We evaluated the strategies on several simulated examples and showed that the augmented greedy heuristic is particularly interesting when some of the habitats to protect are particularly threatened and/or the compactness of the network is accounted for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29543830      PMCID: PMC5854297          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  8 in total

1.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity.

Authors:  M Cabeza; A Moilanen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Habitat conversion and global avian biodiversity loss.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Tim M Blackburn; Kees Klein Goldewijk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts.

Authors:  Kerrie A Wilson; Marissa F McBride; Michael Bode; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment.

Authors:  Marissa F McBride; Kerrie A Wilson; Michael Bode; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Crow White; Mark H Carr; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.

Authors:  R L Pressey; C J Humphries; C R Margules; R I Vane-Wright; P H Williams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; J Emmett Duffy; Andrew Gonzalez; David U Hooper; Charles Perrings; Patrick Venail; Anita Narwani; Georgina M Mace; David Tilman; David A Wardle; Ann P Kinzig; Gretchen C Daily; Michel Loreau; James B Grace; Anne Larigauderie; Diane S Srivastava; Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Improving spatial prioritisation for remote marine regions: optimising biodiversity conservation and sustainable development trade-offs.

Authors:  Cordelia H Moore; Ben T Radford; Hugh P Possingham; Andrew J Heyward; Romola R Stewart; Matthew E Watts; Jim Prescott; Stephen J Newman; Euan S Harvey; Rebecca Fisher; Clay W Bryce; Ryan J Lowe; Oliver Berry; Alexis Espinosa-Gayosso; Errol Sporer; Thor Saunders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.