Literature DB >> 29543064

Biodynamic excisional skin tension lines for surgical excisions: untangling the science.

S P Paul1,2.   

Abstract

Objective There remains confusion between Langer's lines and wrinkle lines with respect to the optimal orientation of elliptical excisions on the trunk. This study sought to determine the directions of wound closure that would result in least wound tension after skin lesion excisions. Materials and methods Some 1181 consecutive skin lesion excisions were investigated (age range 13-95 years, median 64 years) using a tensiometer to determine directions of least wound tension. These lines were mapped. Skin tension measurements were taken during the procedure and analysed. The clear majority of excisions were for skin cancer and the others were for cysts or dysplastic naevi. Lesions such as lipomas, which entail incisional rather than excisional surgery (i.e. where overlying skin was not excised) were excluded. All lesions were cut out in a circular fashion following tension measurements. Closure was undertaken in the direction of least tension (biodynamic excisional skin tension line) and this was illustrated. This process was repeated in all cases where body site and direction of closure was mapped. Statistical analyses were undertaken on a series on the scalp and lower limb. Results Biodynamic excisional skin tension lines have a clear directional preference: scalp-coronal direction, limbs--vertical orientation of ellipses and trunk - mostly horizontal except oblique at the shoulder and scapular regions. Discussion Skin cancer excisions often end up with poor cosmetic results, owing to inconsistency in identifying the correct excisional wound closure lines. This has not been helped by the (hitherto) lack of large in vivo biomechanical studies, and because incisional lines and excisional lines have not been considered separately in surgical practice. Orientating ellipses or wound closures using biodynamic excisional skin tension lines offers a guide to reducing wound tension and minimising wound complications or scarring after cutaneous surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Excision; Langer’s lines; Skin; Skin cancer; Skin tension

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29543064      PMCID: PMC5958865          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culprit.

Authors:  J N Dauendorffer; S Bastuji-Garin; S Guéro; N Brousse; S Fraitag
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Skin tension lines in the domestic pig.

Authors:  E H Rose; G A Ksander; L M Vistnes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The selection of appropriate lines for elective surgical incisions.

Authors:  C J KRAISSL
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946)       Date:  1951-07

4.  The tangled web of Langer's lines.

Authors:  Stephen W Carmichael
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  The stretched scar: a clinical and histological study.

Authors:  B C Sommerlad; J M Creasey
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1978-01

6.  Relaxed skin tension lines (RSTL) versus other skin lines.

Authors:  A F Borges
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A New Skin Tensiometer Device: Computational Analyses To Understand Biodynamic Excisional Skin Tension Lines.

Authors:  Sharad P Paul; Justin Matulich; Nick Charlton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Compressiometer: Toward a New Skin Tensiometer for Research and Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Karlijn M J Scheepens; Nick Marsidi; Roel E Genders; Tim Horeman-Franse
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  Finding the Optimal Surgical Incision Pattern-A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Nikolaus Wachtel; Paul I Heidekrueger; Carolin Brenner; Maximilian Endres; Rainer Burgkart; Carina Micheler; Niklas Thon; Denis Ehrl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Development of a maxillofacial virtual surgical system based on biomechanical parameters of facial soft tissue.

Authors:  Mengjia Cheng; Yu Zhuang; Hanjiang Zhao; Meng Li; Lingfeng Fan; Hongbo Yu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.421

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.