| Literature DB >> 29542303 |
Kyung Duk Min1, Sung Il Cho1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence rate of scrub typhus has been increasing in the Republic of Korea. Previous studies have suggested that this trend may have resulted from the effects of climate change on the transmission dynamics among vectors and hosts, but a clear explanation of the process is still lacking. In this study, we applied mathematical models to explore the potential factors that influence the epidemiology of tsutsugamushi disease.Entities:
Keywords: Mathematical Modeling; Scrub Typhus; Tsutsugamushi Disease
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29542303 PMCID: PMC5852423 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e98
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 5.354
Fig. 1Incidence of scrub typhus in Korea from 2001 to 2016.
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of model 1.
Fig. 3Schematic diagram of model 2.
Parameters used in model 1
| Parameters | Meaning | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| r1 | Contact rate between a larva and a person | 2 × 10−17 | Assumeda |
| r2 | Contact rate between a larva and a rodent | 2 × 10−11 | Assumedb |
| µR | Mortality rate of rodents | 1 | Same as BRc |
| µM | Mortality rate of mites | 20 | Same as BMc |
| γH | Recovery rate of infected humans | 2 | Plamer et al. |
| THL | Transmission probability to humans from a larva bite | 0.75 | Same as TRLd |
| TRL | Transmission probability to rodents from a larva bite | 0.75 | Lerdthusnee et al. |
| TLR | Transmission probability to larva from rodent contact | 0.09 | Takahashi et al. |
| BR | Birth rate of rodents | 1 | Yoon et al. |
| BM | Birth rate of mites | 20 | Kim et al. |
Calculated from aincidence case per year and bchigger index of rodents. cTo satisfy the assumption of fixed population size. dAssumed due to lack of available data.
Parameters used in model 2
| Parameters | Meaning | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| r1 | Contact rate between a larva and a person | 2 × 10−17 | Assumeda |
| r2 | Contact rate between a larva and a rodent | 2 × 10−11 | Assumeda |
| µR | Mortality rate of rodents | 1 | Same as BRa |
| µLQ | Mortality rate of questing larva | 1.5 | Calculatedb |
| µLF | Mortality rate of feeding larva | 7.92 | Calculatedb |
| µA | Mortality rate of adult mite | 0.08 | Yu and Tesh |
| γH | Recovery rate of infected humans | 2 | Plamer et al. |
| THL | Transmission probability to humans from a larva bite | 0.75 | Same as TRLa |
| TRL | Transmission probability to rodents from a larva bite | 0.75 | Lerdthusnee et al. |
| TLR | Transmission probability to larva from rodent contact | 0.09 | Takahashi et al. |
| BR | Birth rate of rodents | 1 | Yoon et al. |
| BM | Birth rate of mites | 20 | Kim et al. |
| ε | Trans-ovarian transmission probability of mites | 0.9 | Shin et al. |
| G | Growth rate | 0.084 | Calculatedb |
aSame as model 1 parameters. bCalculated to satisfy the assumption of fixed population size (the calculation process is described in the text).
Fig. 4Simulation result by model 1 (A) and model 2 (B).
Fig. 5Tornado plot for model 1 (A) and model 2 (B); one-way sensitivity of each parameter for force of infection (per 100,000 person-months).
Minimum compliance level of the differing effectiveness of contact-reducing strategies to reduce r1 by 50%, in the case of a growing population size of rodents (R) and mites (M), relative to humans (H)
| Model | H:R:M (1 : n × 103 : n × 106) | Effectiveness of contact-reducing measures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | ||
| Model 1 | n = 1 | 1 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| n = 1.25 | - a | - a | - a | 0.90 | 0.80 | |
| n = 1.5 | - a | - a | - a | - a | 0.91 | |
| n = 1.75 | - a | - a | - a | - a | 0.97 | |
| n = 2 | - a | - a | - a | - a | 1 | |
| Model 2 | n = 1 | 1 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| n = 1.25 | - a | 1 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| n = 1.5 | - a | - a | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.74 | |
| n = 1.75 | - a | - a | - a | 0.89 | 0.79 | |
| n = 2 | - a | - a | - a | 0.94 | 0.83 | |
aRequired compliance level exceeds 1, indicating that reaching 50% reduced r1 is impossible.