Michele J Upvall1, Jeanne M Leffers2. 1. College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. 2. College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Models to guide global health partnerships are rare in the nursing literature. The Conceptual Model for Partnership and Sustainability in Global Health while significant was based on Western perspectives. The purpose of this study was to revise the model to include the voice of nurses from low- and middle-resource countries. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Grounded theory was used to maintain fidelity with the design in the original model. A purposive sample of 15 participants from a variety of countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and Southeast Asia and having extensive experience in global health partnerships were interviewed. MEASURES: Skype recordings and in-person interviews were audiotaped using the same questions as the original study. Theoretical coding and a comparison of results with the original study was completed independently by the researchers. RESULTS: The process of global health partnerships was expanded from the original model to include engagement processes and processes for ongoing partnership development. New concepts of Transparency, Expanded World View, and Accompaniment were included as well as three broad themes: Geopolitical Influence, Power differential/Inequities, and Collegial Friendships. CONCLUSION: The revised conceptual model embodies a more comprehensive model of global health partnerships with representation of nurses from low- and middle-resource countries.
OBJECTIVES: Models to guide global health partnerships are rare in the nursing literature. The Conceptual Model for Partnership and Sustainability in Global Health while significant was based on Western perspectives. The purpose of this study was to revise the model to include the voice of nurses from low- and middle-resource countries. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Grounded theory was used to maintain fidelity with the design in the original model. A purposive sample of 15 participants from a variety of countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and Southeast Asia and having extensive experience in global health partnerships were interviewed. MEASURES: Skype recordings and in-person interviews were audiotaped using the same questions as the original study. Theoretical coding and a comparison of results with the original study was completed independently by the researchers. RESULTS: The process of global health partnerships was expanded from the original model to include engagement processes and processes for ongoing partnership development. New concepts of Transparency, Expanded World View, and Accompaniment were included as well as three broad themes: Geopolitical Influence, Power differential/Inequities, and Collegial Friendships. CONCLUSION: The revised conceptual model embodies a more comprehensive model of global health partnerships with representation of nurses from low- and middle-resource countries.
Authors: William E Rosa; Julia Downing; Betty R Ferrell; Liz Grant; Samuel T Matula; Shila Pandey; Jainaba Sey-Sawo; Mansur Sowe; Michele Upvall Journal: Int J Palliat Nurs Date: 2021-10-02
Authors: Charles P Larson; Katrina M Plamondon; Leslie Dubent; Frank Bicaba; Abel Bicaba; Tran Hung Minh; An Nguyen; Jacques E Girard; Jean Ramdé; Theresa W Gyorkos Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract Date: 2022-04-29