| Literature DB >> 29542019 |
Michał Romański1, Anna Zacharzewska1, Artur Teżyk2, Franciszek K Główka3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treosulfan is a prodrug applied in the treatment of ovarian cancer and conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. So far, the bioanalysis of treosulfan in either whole blood or red blood cells (RBC) has not been carried out. In this work, the RBC/plasma partition coefficient (Ke/p) of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide was determined for the first time.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29542019 PMCID: PMC6133075 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-018-0469-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ISSN: 0378-7966 Impact factor: 2.441
Validation parameters for determination of treosulfan and S,S-EBDM in rat plasma and RBC
| Parameter | Treosulfan | S,S-EBDM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | RBC | Plasma | RBC | |
| Linearity (μM)a | 1.1–110 (curve I) | 1.9–93 | ||
| 110–2209 (curve II) | ||||
| Precision—CV (%)b | ||||
| Within-run ( | 2.8–7.6 (2.8) | 3.1–9.0 (9.0) | 3.7–19.5 (19.5) | 3.1–5.1 (4.1) |
| Between-run ( | 1.0–6.1 (6.1) | 2.9–11.1 (4.1) | 3.0–6.0 (6.0) | 2.4–4.0 (4.0) |
| Accuracy (%)b | ||||
| Within-run ( | 94.7–119.5 (119.5) | 94.3–109.5 (100) | 101.8–109.2 (109.2) | 91.4–109.1 (91.4) |
| Between-run ( | 97.8–104.6 (104.6) | 85.7–102.9 (85.7) | 102.4–113.2 (113.2) | 95.2–103.9 (95.2) |
| Stability (%) ( | 90.7–108.8 | 85.8–104.8 | 88.3–89.4 | 86.7–89.8 |
CV coefficient of variation, LLOQ lowest limit of quantitation, RBC red blood cells, S,S-EBDM (2S,3S)-1,2-epoxy-3,4-butanediol 4-methanesulfonate (treosulfan monoepoxide)
aThe calibration curves were established using the calibration standards at 7–8 concentration levels. For the analysis of treosulfan, two calibration curves were prepared that covered low and high concentrations. The LLOQ was the lowest concentration of the calibration standard
bThe ranges shown in the table include the mean results obtained for the quality control samples containing treosulfan at 1.1, 22, 55, 110, 1104, and 2209 μM, and S,S-EBDM at 1.9, 37, and 94 μM. The values in the parentheses show the results obtained for the LLOQ level
cThe stability values were calculated as a ratio of the final to the initial concentration of the analyte in the samples used in the freeze–thaw stability test. The ranges shown in the table include the mean results obtained for the quality control samples containing treosulfan at 5.5, 55, and 800 μM, and S,S-EBDM at 9.4 and 94 μM
Ke/p of treosulfan and S,S-EBDM determined in rats at 1 and 4 h following intraperitoneal bolus injection of treosulfan at the dose of 500 mg/kg body weight
| Time (h) | Rat no. | Sex | Treosulfan | S,S-EBDM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 1 | M | 943 | 704 | 0.75 | 58 | 36 | 0.62 |
| 2 | M | 1189 | 779 | 0.66 | 61 | 34 | 0.57 | |
| 3 | M | 28.8 | 24.2 | 0.84 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 0.57 | |
| 4 | F | 1164 | 741 | 0.64 | 64 | 30 | 0.48 | |
| 5 | F | 300 | 204 | 0.68 | 22 | 15 | 0.70 | |
| 6 | F | 349 | 158 | 0.45 | 22 | 11 | 0.48 | |
| 4 | 7 | M | 112 | 94 | 0.84 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 0.57 |
| 8 | M | 120 | 87 | 0.73 | 8.4 | 6.7 | 0.79 | |
| 9 | M | 30 | 26 | 0.87 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 0.64 | |
| 10 | F | 94 | 74 | 0.80 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 0.60 | |
| 11 | F | 113 | 90 | 0.79 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 0.67 | |
| 12 | F | 83 | 70 | 0.85 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 0.56 | |
C drug concentration in red blood cells, C drug concentration in plasma, F female, K red blood cells/plasma partition coefficient, M male
Fig. 1Plot of the Ke/p of treosulfan and S,S-EBDM against Cp following intraperitoneal bolus injection of treosulfan at the dose of 500 mg/kg body weight. The solid and dotted lines show the mean ± standard deviation. C drug concentration in plasma, K red blood cells/plasma partition coefficient
| Treosulfan and its monoepoxide achieve higher concentrations in plasma than in RBC and whole blood. |
| In contrast to the monoepoxide, the RBC/plasma partitioning of treosulfan seems to be concentration-dependent. |