Ondrej Fabian1, Ondrej Hradsky2, Tereza Drskova2, Filip Mikus3, Josef Zamecnik3, Jiri Bronsky2. 1. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. Ondrej.Fabian2@fnmotol.cz. 2. Department of Paediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remains challenging. We aimed at the value of immunohistochemical assessment of CD30+ lymphocytes in the intestinal mucosa in differential diagnosis between pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and its utility as a predictor of future differentiation in patients with IBD unclassified (IBDU). METHODS: Seventy-four treatment naive pediatric patients with IBD (33 CD, 30 UC and 11 IBDU) were enrolled into the study. Biopsy samples from six different regions (terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectum) were immunohistochemically stained with anti-CD30 antibody, and the number of positive cells per one high power field was quantified. RESULTS: Significant differences between CD and UC were found when compared total counts of CD30+ cells in median numbers, mean values and maximal numbers and also for separate counts in terminal ileum, transverse colon, descending colon and rectum. The most profound difference between CD and UC was shown for total median values of CD30+ cells and for the values in rectal localization. The difference was independent on the intensity of inflammation. A cutoff value of 2.5 CD30+ cells with sensitivity 83% and specificity 90% was found for the rectum. There was no difference between patients with CD and IBDU, but a marked difference between UC and IBDU patients was revealed. CONCLUSION: Histopathological assessment of biopsy with rectal CD30+ count is reliable and simple method that could help in differential diagnosis among IBD subtypes in children with IBD.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remains challenging. We aimed at the value of immunohistochemical assessment of CD30+ lymphocytes in the intestinal mucosa in differential diagnosis between pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and its utility as a predictor of future differentiation in patients with IBD unclassified (IBDU). METHODS: Seventy-four treatment naive pediatric patients with IBD (33 CD, 30 UC and 11 IBDU) were enrolled into the study. Biopsy samples from six different regions (terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectum) were immunohistochemically stained with anti-CD30 antibody, and the number of positive cells per one high power field was quantified. RESULTS: Significant differences between CD and UC were found when compared total counts of CD30+ cells in median numbers, mean values and maximal numbers and also for separate counts in terminal ileum, transverse colon, descending colon and rectum. The most profound difference between CD and UC was shown for total median values of CD30+ cells and for the values in rectal localization. The difference was independent on the intensity of inflammation. A cutoff value of 2.5 CD30+ cells with sensitivity 83% and specificity 90% was found for the rectum. There was no difference between patients with CD and IBDU, but a marked difference between UC and IBDUpatients was revealed. CONCLUSION: Histopathological assessment of biopsy with rectal CD30+ count is reliable and simple method that could help in differential diagnosis among IBD subtypes in children with IBD.
Authors: R Giacomelli; A Passacantando; I Parzanese; P Vernia; N Klidara; F Cucinelli; R Lattanzio; E Santori; P Cipriani; R Caprilli; G Tonietti Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Samuel D James; Paul E Wise; Tania Zuluaga-Toro; David A Schwartz; M Kay Washington; Chanjuan Shi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Athos Bousvaros; Donald A Antonioli; Richard B Colletti; Marla C Dubinsky; Jonathan N Glickman; Benjamin D Gold; Anne M Griffiths; Gareth P Jevon; Leslie M Higuchi; Jeffrey S Hyams; Barbara S Kirschner; Subra Kugathasan; Robert N Baldassano; Pierre A Russo Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Fernando Magro; Paolo Gionchetti; Rami Eliakim; Sandro Ardizzone; Alessandro Armuzzi; Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta; Johan Burisch; Krisztina B Gecse; Ailsa L Hart; Pieter Hindryckx; Cord Langner; Jimmy K Limdi; Gianluca Pellino; Edyta Zagórowicz; Tim Raine; Marcus Harbord; Florian Rieder Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 10.020
Authors: Arie Levine; Sibylle Koletzko; Dan Turner; Johanna C Escher; Salvatore Cucchiara; Lissy de Ridder; Kaija-Leena Kolho; Gabor Veres; Richard K Russell; Anders Paerregaard; Stephan Buderus; Mary-Louise C Greer; Jorge A Dias; Gigi Veereman-Wauters; Paolo Lionetti; Malgorzata Sladek; Javier Martin de Carpi; Annamaria Staiano; Frank M Ruemmele; David C Wilson Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Isabelle Cleynen; Gabrielle Boucher; Luke Jostins; L Philip Schumm; Sebastian Zeissig; Tariq Ahmad; Vibeke Andersen; Jane M Andrews; Vito Annese; Stephan Brand; Steven R Brant; Judy H Cho; Mark J Daly; Marla Dubinsky; Richard H Duerr; Lynnette R Ferguson; Andre Franke; Richard B Gearry; Philippe Goyette; Hakon Hakonarson; Jonas Halfvarson; Johannes R Hov; Hailang Huang; Nicholas A Kennedy; Limas Kupcinskas; Ian C Lawrance; James C Lee; Jack Satsangi; Stephan Schreiber; Emilie Théâtre; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; Rinse K Weersma; David C Wilson; Miles Parkes; Severine Vermeire; John D Rioux; John Mansfield; Mark S Silverberg; Graham Radford-Smith; Dermot P B McGovern; Jeffrey C Barrett; Charlie W Lees Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 202.731