Literature DB >> 29541471

Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Munveer S Bhangoo1, Brian Cheng2, Gregory P Botta1, Phataraporn Thorson3, Michael P Kosty1.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnostic accuracy studies in bladder cancer patients. English language studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of OCT for bladder cancer were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases in December 2014. Histopathology was a reference standard. Sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios and negative likelihood ratios were calculated, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to determine the diagnostic accuracy of OCT. Finally, 9 eligible studies (468 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of OCT were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-0.98], 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85), 6.83 (95% CI: 3.24-14.1) and 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.16), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratio was 138.88 (95% CI: 29.63-650.89) and the overall area under the curve was 0.9735. These results suggest that OCT has excellent diagnostic performance in patients with bladder cancer and recurrent lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; optical coherence tomography

Year:  2018        PMID: 29541471      PMCID: PMC5838294          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  3 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced Endoscopy in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Shane Pearce; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Transurethral resection of the urinary bladder : Status quo and outlook on new developments].

Authors:  Matthias Jahnen; Florian P Kirchhoff; Jürgen E Gschwend; Michael Straub
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Statistical evaluation of reader variability in assessing the diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sarah J Erickson-Bhatt; Douglas G Simpson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.170

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.