| Literature DB >> 29541332 |
Conor Raleigh1, Bernard Donne1, Neil Fleming1.
Abstract
We compared lactate threshold (TLac) with non-invasive markers of an aerobic-anaerobic transition; namely, ventilatory (VT) and tissue saturation index (TSIT) thresholds. While identification of a breakpoint in blood lactate concentration ([BLa]) is common for determination of an aerobic-anaerobic transition, non-invasive measures, VT and NIRS, have also received attention as a means of determining this critical exercise intensity. We hypothesised that one or other of these non-invasive measures would have a strong association with TLac. Thirty-one (n=31) competitive male athletes (mean ± SD, age 29±9 yr, height 1.81±0.1 m, body mass 77.7±10.0 kg) performed graded incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Heart rate, TSI and gas exchange data were measured throughout and [BLa] was determined at fixed intervals. Threshold detection involved a segmented linear regression analysis minimising the squared sum of the residuals to determine TLac, TSIT and VT. Workload and HR at TLac, VT and TSIT were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and correlation assessed using Pearson's and interclass correlation coefficients. Thresholds at TSIT and TLac were not significantly different (255±35 vs. 249±30 W, P>0.05), suggesting that limitations in O2 delivery could be closely linked to an aerobic-anaerobic transition. However, poor correlation (r=0.55, ICC=0.54 and 95%LoA of +67 and -54 W) suggested other factors may exert an influence. Mean VT occurred at a significantly higher workload than TLac (271 ±35 vs 249±30 W, P<0.001). Consequently, VT proved less useful, giving an indication of when an aerobic-anaerobic transition had already occurred. In conclusion, non-invasive markers of the aerobic transition are not concurrent with TLac.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic; NIRS; anaerobic; muscle oxygenation; ventilation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29541332 PMCID: PMC5841671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Exerc Sci ISSN: 1939-795X
Figure 1(a) BLa vs workload displaying TLac (294 W), (b) TSI vs workload displaying TSIT (239 W) and (c) VEVO2 vs workload displaying VT (316 W).
Mean GxT performance indicators, n=31.
| BLa at TLac (mmol.L−1) | Workload at OBLA (W) | Pmax (W) | VO2max (mL.kg−1.min−1) | HRmax (beats.min−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.4 | 308 | 349 | 62.5 | 183 |
| SD | 1.0 | 33 | 31 | 8.1 | 11 |
Figure 2Mean workload at each computed threshold. *** denotes significant difference of P ≤ 0.001. Bars denote SD, n=31.
Correlation and association analysis of computed thresholds, n=31.
| r | ICC | Mean bias (W) | 95% LoA (W) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSIT vs TLac | 0.56 | 0.54 | 6.387 | +67 to −54 |
| TSIT vs VT | 0.41 | 0.36 | −15.35 | +60 to −91 |
| VT vs TLac | 0.74 | 0.56 | −21.74 | +70 to −26 |
Figure 3(a) Bland-Altman plot displaying mean bias with upper and lower 95% LoA for (a) TSIT vs TLac; (b) VT vs TLac; n=31.
Figure 4Mean HR at each assessed threshold. * denotes significantly different to VT, * infers P < 0.05 and *** infers P < 0.001. Bars denote SD, n=31.