| Literature DB >> 29541036 |
Cristian V Francavilla1, Francesco Sessa2, Monica Salerno2, Giuseppe D Albano2, Ines Villano3, Giovanni Messina2, Fabio Triolo4, Lorenzo Todaro5, Maria Ruberto6, Gabriella Marsala7, Orazio Cascio8, Maria P Mollica3, Vincenzo Monda3, Giuseppe Cibelli2, Anna Valenzano2, Christian Zammit9, Marcellino Monda3, Antonietta Messina3.
Abstract
Background: After long-term intensive training, considerable morphological and functional heart changes occur in professional athletes. Such changes arise progressively and regress upon interruption of the physical activity. Morphological and functional alterations on heart are known as "Athlete's heart" condition. Objective: This study aims to compare echocardiographic parameters in two different groups of professional athletes. Furthermore, a prospective study is performed analyzing the echocardiographic changes occurring in 12 professional players in 3 years of follow-up. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: athlete's heart; echocardiographic parameters; heart adaptation to exercise; left ventricle dimensions; professional football player
Year: 2018 PMID: 29541036 PMCID: PMC5835836 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
The principal biological parameters for each group.
| Mean age | 26.6 ± 3.1 | 18.3 ± 0.6 |
| Mean height (m) | 1.85 ± 0.08 | 1.83 ± 0.04 |
| Mean weight (Kg) | 78 ± 8.6 | 75.5 ± 5.2 |
| Mean BMI | 22.8 ± 1.13 | 22.5 ± 0.8 |
| Heart rate range | 37–58 bpm | 45–64 bpm |
| Mean blood pressure | 70/110 | 70/110 |
| % SpO2 | 99% | 99% |
Figure 1The analysis of left ventricle size between Group A and Group B: statistically significant differences were found in the second and third year (A, First year; B, Second year; C, Third year).
Figure 2The analysis of left atrial size between Group A and Group B: statistically significant differences were found in the second and third year (A, First year; B, Second year; C, Third year).
Figure 3The analysis of intervertricular size between Group A and Group B: statistically significant differences were found in the first, second and third year (A, First year; B, Second year; C, Third year).
Figure 4The analysis of the ejection fraction between Group A and Group B: no statistically significant differences were found (A, First year; B, Second year; C, Third year).
Figure 5Left ventricle size variation during the three years follow-up.
Figure 6Left atrial size variation during the three years follow-up.
Figure 7Interventricular septum size variation during the three years follow-up.
Figure 8Ejection fraction variation during the three years follow-up.