| Literature DB >> 29540638 |
Dilruba Sharmin1, Yong Guo1, Tomoyasu Nishizawa1,2, Shoko Ohshima1, Yoshinori Sato3, Yusuke Takashima2, Kazuhiko Narisawa1,2, Hiroyuki Ohta1,2.
Abstract
Endohyphal bacteria (EHB), dwelling within fungal hyphae, markedly affect the growth and metabolic potential of their hosts. To date, two EHB belonging to the family Burkholderiaceae have been isolated and characterized as new taxa, Burkholderia rhizoxinica (HKI 454T) and Mycoavidus cysteinexigens (B1-EBT), in Japan. Metagenome sequencing was recently reported for Mortierella elongata AG77 together with its endosymbiont M. cysteinexigens (Mc-AG77) from a soil/litter sample in the USA. In the present study, we elucidated the complete genome sequence of B1-EBT and compared it with those of Mc-AG77 and HKI 454T. The genomes of B1-EBT and Mc-AG77 contained a higher level of prophage sequences and were markedly smaller than that of HKI 454T. Although the B1-EBT and Mc-AG77 genomes lacked the chitinolytic enzyme genes responsible for invasion into fungal cells, they contained several predicted toxin-antitoxin systems including an insecticidal toxin complex and PIN domain imposing an addiction-like mechanism essential for endohyphal growth control during host colonization. Despite the different host fungi, the alignment of amino acid sequences showed that the HKI 454T genome consisted of 1,265 (32.6%) and 1,221 (31.5%) orthologous coding sequences (CDSs) with those of B1-EBT and Mc-AG77, respectively. This comparative study of three phylogenetically associated endosymbionts has provided insights into their origin and evolution, and suggests the later bacterial invasion and adaptation of B1-EBT to its host metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: B. rhizoxinica; M. cysteinexigens; endohyphal symbiont; genome; interaction
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29540638 PMCID: PMC5877345 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Schematic spherical illustration of the B1-EBT genome. Circles display from the inside to the outside as follows: (ring 1) GC-skew (G-C/G+C ratio) using a 1-kb window; (ring 2) GC-content using a 1-kb window; (ring 3) 454-contigs; (ring 4) relative bacteria of predicted CDSs; (ring 5) rRNAs and tRNAs; (rings 6 and 7) predicted CDSs transcribed in a counterclockwise/clockwise direction; (ring 8) intact, questionable, and incomplete prophage sequences are indicated in blue, green, and red solid bars, respectively; (ring 9) transposons; and (ring 10) scale in kb. Red and blue text outside shows the positions of phage-related genes and insecticidal toxin proteins, respectively.
Fig. 2Prophage sequences within B1-EBT (A), Mc-AG77 (B), and HKI 454T (C) genomes. The details of each region are shown in Fig. S1. Position-based identification of prophage region is shown in colors. The scale bar is in bp.
Fig. 3Randomized axelerated maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on concatenated sequences (11,023 positions in total) of five housekeeping genes (atpD, gyrB, lepA, recA, and rpoB) indicating the relative placement of the three endofungal bacteria (bold) and other genera in the families Burkholderiaceae and Ralstoniaceae. Pairwise distance between B1-EBT and Mc-AG77 is 0.013. The horizontal lines show genetic distances, which are supported by values estimated with 100 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per nucleotide position.
Comparative genome analysis of M. cysteinexigens B1-EBT, Mc-AG77, and B. rhizoxinica HKI 454T.
| Organism | Genome size (bp) | G+C content (%) | Coding sequences (CDSs) | Mobile genetic, elements, (% for all CDSs) | Transcriptional, regulators, (% for all CDSs) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,795,004 | 48.9 | 2,317 | 146 (6.3) | 39 (1.68) | This research | |
| 2,638,116 | 49.0 | 2,255 | 71 (3.14) | 39 (1.72) | Uehling | |
| 3,750,139 | 60.7 | 3,870 | 255 (6.6) | 193 (5.0) | Lackner |
Includes a 2,755,309-bp chromosome, 822,304-bp mega plasmid, and 172,525-bp plasmid.
Genes coding for mobile genetic elements are predicted from the homologous sequence of the B1-EBT genome.
Genes coding for transcriptional regulators are predicted from the homologous sequence of the B1-EBT genome.
Fig. 4Genome comparison of three beta-proteobacterial endohyphal symbionts. (A) Pie chart showing the distribution (% shared proteomes) of ortholog clusters (BDBH) based on % identity among the proteomes of Mycoavidus and B. rhizoxinica genomes. (B) Comparative mapping showing links among homologous sequences. The circular exterior displays the genomes of organisms clockwise. Ribbons between genomes indicate regions of shared homology based on the % identity of amino acid pairs between each pair of organisms. Darker colors correspond to higher identity links and the lighter color corresponds to a lower identity (see legends).
Phage-related CDSs in genomes of M. cysteinexigens B1-EBT, Mc-AG77, and B. rhizoxinica HKI 454T.
| Bacterial host of relative phage/prophage in | B1-EBT | Mc-AG77 | HKI 454T | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| CDS count | Percentage | CDS count | Percentage | CDS count | Percentage | |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 0 | — | |
| 4 | 1.50 | 2 | 1.50 | 0 | — | |
| 2 | 0.75 | 4 | 3.01 | 0 | — | |
| 9 | 3.37 | 7 | 5.26 | 4 | 5.06 | |
| 13 | 4.87 | 3 | 2.26 | 0 | — | |
| 39 | 14.61 | 21 | 15.79 | 57 | 72.15 | |
| 197 | 73.78 | 95 | 71.43 | 18 | 22.78 | |
| 1 | 0.37 | 0 | — | 0 | — | |
|
| ||||||
Comparison of metabolic potentials, nutrient uptake and defense responses in B1-EBT, Mc-AG77, and HKI 454T.
| Attributes | B1-EBT | Mc-AG77 | HKI 454T |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Primary metabolism | |||
| Gluconeogenesis | − | − | + |
| Ethanol assimilation | − | − | + |
| Import of organic acids | − | − | + |
| Amino acid metabolism | + | + | + |
| Biosynthetic routes for proteinogenic amino acids | + | + | + |
| Dipeptide and oligopeptide import system | + | + | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Biosynthesis of pyridoxine | + | + | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Putative cobalamin transport system | + | + | + |
| Fe2+, Mg2+, Co2+, Zn2+, K+ uptake system | + | + | + |
| Na+/Ca2+ antiporter | + | + | + |
| Na+/citrate symporter | + | + | + |
| NRPS/PKS | − | − | + |
| Lantibibiotic biosynthesis | − | − | + |
| Chitinolytic enzymes and chitin-binding proteins | − | − | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Branched-chain amino acid | + | + | + |
| Aromatic amino acid | + | + | + |
| Histidine | + | + | + |
| Glutamate/aspartate | + | + | + |
| Glycine | + | + | + |
| Citrate | + | + | + |
| Biosynthetic routes for proteinogenic amino acids | + | + | + |
| Efflux systems for arginine, histidine, lysine | + | + | + |
| Efflux systems for cysteine | − | − | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Phosphatidylethanolamine | + | + | − |
| Phosphatidylglycerol | + | + | − |
| Diphosphatidylglycerol | + | + | − |
| Aminophospholipid | + | + | − |
| Aminolipids | + | + | − |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Acetyl-CoA carboxylase components | + | + | + |
| Saturated/unsaturated synthase components | + | + | + |
| Peripheral enzymes (ACP synthase and biotin ligase) | + | + | + |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | + | + | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Lipopolysaccharide | − | − | + |
| O-antigen | − | − | + |
| Inner membrane ABC transporter, MsbA | + | + | + |
| Transport complex (LptA, LptAB, LptC, LptD, LptE, LptG) | − | − | + |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Antigen flippase and polymerase | − | − | + |
| Trans-envelope transport complex (Wza/Wzb/Wzc) | − | − | + |
| Glycosyltransferases gene | + | + | + |
| Mannosyltransferase gene | − | − | + |
Genes listed in Mc-AG77 are predicted from the homologous sequence of the B1-EBT genome.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase/polyketide synthase
Fig. 5Model representing metabolic processes and the secretion system assumed from the B1-EBT genome. Putative type II, III, IV, and VI secretory proteins are highlighted in grey. POT, polyamine transport system; PST, phosphate-specific transport; DPP, dipeptide permease; FHU, ferrichrome-uptake; EPSs, exopolysaccharides; LPSs, lipopolysaccharides; IM, inner membrane; OM, outer membrane; OMP, outer membrane protein; IMP, inner membrane protein; SEC, general secretion pathway; TAT, twin arginine translocation pathway.