Literature DB >> 29540289

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty vs CN XII stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: A single institution experience.

Janki Shah1, Jonathon O Russell2, Tina Waters3, Alan H Kominsky4, Douglas Trask4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy is an emerging surgical treatment for select patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aims to compare outcomes in patients with moderate to severe OSA who underwent HNS surgery (Inspire Medical Systems) and those who underwent traditional airway reconstructive surgery, specifically uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP).
METHODS: Patients who underwent HNS implantation (n = 20), all with moderate to severe OSA, inability to adhere to positive pressure therapy, and compliant with previously published inclusion criteria, were compared to a historical cohort that were intolerant of CPAP with similar inclusion criteria who all underwent UPPP (n = 20) with some also undergoing additional procedures such as septoplasty/turbinate reduction. Data including body mass index (BMI), pre- and post-implant apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were assessed.
RESULTS: For patients who underwent HNS, mean preoperative BMI was 28.0. Mean AHI decreased significantly from 38.9 ± 12.5 to 4.5 ± 4.8. All patients achieved an AHI < 20 post implant with 65% (13/20) with an AHI ≤ 5. For patients who underwent traditional airway surgery, mean preoperative BMI was 27.5; mean AHI decreased from 40.3 ± 12.4 to 28.8 ± 25.4.
CONCLUSION: While both traditional surgery and HNS are effective treatments for patients with moderate to severe OSA with CPAP intolerance, our study demonstrates that HNS is "curative" in normalizing the AHI to <5 in the majority of patients. For select patients, HNS therapy provides excellent objective improvement in outcome measures.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apnea hypopnea index; Hypoglossal nerve stimulation; Obstructive sleep apnea; Upper airway surgery; Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29540289     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  7 in total

1.  Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Clemens Heiser; Armin Steffen; Patrick J Strollo; Claire Giaie-Miniet; Olivier M Vanderveken; Benedikt Hofauer
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Spain: Implementation Strategy and Early Results in a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Peter Michael Baptista; Carlos Prieto-Matos; Manuel Alegre-Esteban; Elena Urrestarazu-Bolumburu; Juan Alcade Navarrete
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-14

3.  Comparison of readmission and complication rates between traditional sleep surgery and hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Ryan Nord; Thomas Fitzpatrick; Jonathan P DeShazo; Evan R Reiter
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-22

4.  Upper airway stimulation vs other upper airway surgical procedures for OSA: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chairat Neruntarat; Pisit Wanichakorntrakul; Kitsarawut Khuancharee; Petcharat Saengthong; Mongkol Tangngekkee
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Post-operative Complication Rate Comparison Between Airway Surgery and Upper Airway Stimulation Using NSQIP and ADHERE.

Authors:  Douglas J Van Daele; John W Cromwell; Jennifer K Hsia; Ryan S Nord
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 6.  Clinical and Research Solutions to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review.

Authors:  Fen Xia; Mohamad Sawan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.

Authors:  David Kent; Jeffrey Stanley; R Nisha Aurora; Corinna G Levine; Daniel J Gottlieb; Matthew D Spann; Carlos A Torre; Katherine Green; Christopher G Harrod
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.