INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff (RC) tears are common and a frequent cause of dysfunction in the shoulder, especially with progression of age. Biceps pathology occurs concomitantly and its relationship with RC tears has been well described. However, the study of biceps intervention affecting outcomes of RC repair is limited. We aim to study the effect of biceps tenotomy in RC repair after matching for cuff tear size. METHODS: We collected data of 24 consecutive patients undergoing RC repair and biceps tenotomy and matched them with patients undergoing RC repair only ( n = 24). The groups were matched for age, RC tear size, and presence of subscapularis tears. All patients of this study underwent RC repair under a single surgeon. Patient demographics and outcome measures in the form of range of motion (ROM) pain scores and validated shoulder scores (Constant shoulder score, Oxford score, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder score) were collected preoperative and at predetermined fixed intervals up to 2 years postoperatively. We then compared the two groups using a mixed analysis of variance design so as to identify any possible differences. RESULTS: Patients from both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ROM, lower pain scores, and improvement in functional outcomes ( p < 0.05). Patients with biceps intervention demonstrated equivalent outcomes postoperatively up to 2 years with no statistical differences ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthoscopic RC repair is an effective intervention for improving ROM, reducing pain, and improving function. Concomitant biceps procedure did not negatively impede recovery or affect outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff (RC) tears are common and a frequent cause of dysfunction in the shoulder, especially with progression of age. Biceps pathology occurs concomitantly and its relationship with RC tears has been well described. However, the study of biceps intervention affecting outcomes of RC repair is limited. We aim to study the effect of biceps tenotomy in RC repair after matching for cuff tear size. METHODS: We collected data of 24 consecutive patients undergoing RC repair and biceps tenotomy and matched them with patients undergoing RC repair only ( n = 24). The groups were matched for age, RC tear size, and presence of subscapularis tears. All patients of this study underwent RC repair under a single surgeon. Patient demographics and outcome measures in the form of range of motion (ROM) pain scores and validated shoulder scores (Constant shoulder score, Oxford score, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder score) were collected preoperative and at predetermined fixed intervals up to 2 years postoperatively. We then compared the two groups using a mixed analysis of variance design so as to identify any possible differences. RESULTS:Patients from both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ROM, lower pain scores, and improvement in functional outcomes ( p < 0.05). Patients with biceps intervention demonstrated equivalent outcomes postoperatively up to 2 years with no statistical differences ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthoscopic RC repair is an effective intervention for improving ROM, reducing pain, and improving function. Concomitant biceps procedure did not negatively impede recovery or affect outcomes.
Authors: Daniel Nemirov; Zachary Herman; Ryan W Paul; Ari Clements; Matthew Beucherie; Joseph Brutico; Christopher J Hadley; Michael G Ciccotti; Kevin B Freedman; Brandon J Erickson; Sommer Hammoud; Meghan E Bishop Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-11-27