Literature DB >> 29539997

Defensive medicine and diagnostic testing.

Mario Plebani1.   

Abstract

Defensive medicine often involves the excessive ordering of diagnostic tests. Constantly aware of the risk of malpractice liability, physicians turn to diagnostic tests with the goal of reducing the likelihood of error. Findings reported in literature suggest that medical malpractice contributes significantly to the increased use of diagnostic testing and related costs. It has also been demonstrated that defensive testing not only increases costs but harms patients to a degree that depends on the risk incurred by the test itself, its false-positive and false-negative rates, the benefits and risks of available therapies, and the prior probability of disease. Several solutions have been proposed in the attempt to address this issue, but the physician's competence and training appear to be key factors, data from clinical trials showing that education and feedback for improving test-ordering tendencies have a prolonged effect. Particularly in the field of laboratory medicine, increasing attention is being paid to improving demand management in order to minimize inappropriate testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  defensive medicine; defensive testing; demand management; inappropriate request; liability; patient safety

Year:  2014        PMID: 29539997     DOI: 10.1515/dx-2014-0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)        ISSN: 2194-802X


  4 in total

1.  Defensive medicine in Europe: a 'full circle'?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-12-26

2.  Association of 152 Biomarker Reference Intervals with All-Cause Mortality in Participants of a General United States Survey from 1999 to 2010.

Authors:  Nam Pho; Arjun K Manrai; John T Leppert; Glenn M Chertow; John P A Ioannidis; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viraj Bhise; Suja S Rajan; Dean F Sittig; Robert O Morgan; Pooja Chaudhary; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Case report of unexplained hypocalcaemia in a slightly haemolysed sample.

Authors:  Michael Cornes
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.