Literature DB >> 29539988

Laboratory-associated and diagnostic errors: a neglected link.

Mario Plebani1.   

Abstract

Clinical laboratories play a vital role in patient care, but many diagnostic errors are associated with laboratory testing. The past decades have seen sustained improvements in analytical performances but the error rates, particularly in pre- and post-analytical phases is still high. Although the seminal concept of the brain-to-brain laboratory loop has been described more than four decades ago, the awareness about the importance of extra-analytical aspects in laboratory quality is a recent achievement. According to this concept, all phases and activities of the testing cycle should be assessed, monitored and improved in order to decrease the total error rates and thereby improve patient safety. In the interests of patients, any direct or indirect negative consequence related to a laboratory test must be considered, irrespective of which step is involved and whether the error depends on a laboratory professional (e.g., calibration or testing error) or a non-laboratory operator (e.g., inappropriate test request, error in patient identification and/or blood collection). Data collected in various clinical settings demonstrate that many diagnostic errors are associated with laboratory testing. In particular, errors are due to inappropriate test request and/or result interpretation and utilization. Collaborations between laboratory professionals and other care providers, namely clinicians and nurses, are needed to achieve the goal of improved patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain-to-brain loop; diagnostic errors; laboratory medicine; laboratory-associated errors; patient safety; quality

Year:  2014        PMID: 29539988     DOI: 10.1515/dx-2013-0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)        ISSN: 2194-802X


  4 in total

1.  Driving the route of laboratory medicine: a manifesto for the future.

Authors:  Mario Plebani; Michael Laposata; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Extra-Analytical Clinical Laboratory Errors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Asmelash; Abebaw Worede; Mulugeta Teshome
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  What Contributes to Diagnostic Error or Delay? A Qualitative Exploration Across Diverse Acute Care Settings in the United States.

Authors:  Amelia Barwise; Aaron Leppin; Yue Dong; Chanyan Huang; Yuliya Pinevich; Svetlana Herasevich; Jalal Soleimani; Ognjen Gajic; Brian Pickering; Ashok Kumbamu
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.243

4.  Patient and Sample Identification. Out of the Maze?

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Laura Chiozza; Camilla Mattiuzzi; Mario Plebani
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.