Literature DB >> 29539401

Characterization of Cell Boundary and Confocal Effects Improves Quantitative FRAP Analysis.

James L Kingsley1, Jeffrey P Bibeau2, S Iman Mousavi1, Cem Unsal1, Zhilu Chen3, Xinming Huang3, Luis Vidali4, Erkan Tüzel5.   

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is an important tool used by cell biologists to study the diffusion and binding kinetics of vesicles, proteins, and other molecules in the cytoplasm, nucleus, or cell membrane. Although many FRAP models have been developed over the past decades, the influence of the complex boundaries of 3D cellular geometries on the recovery curves, in conjunction with regions of interest and optical effects (imaging, photobleaching, photoswitching, and scanning), has not been well studied. Here, we developed a 3D computational model of the FRAP process that incorporates particle diffusion, cell boundary effects, and the optical properties of the scanning confocal microscope, and validated this model using the tip-growing cells of Physcomitrella patens. We then show how these cell boundary and optical effects confound the interpretation of FRAP recovery curves, including the number of dynamic states of a given fluorophore, in a wide range of cellular geometries-both in two and three dimensions-namely nuclei, filopodia, and lamellipodia of mammalian cells, and in cell types such as the budding yeast, Saccharomyces pombe, and tip-growing plant cells. We explored the performance of existing analytical and algorithmic FRAP models in these various cellular geometries, and determined that the VCell VirtualFRAP tool provides the best accuracy to measure diffusion coefficients. Our computational model is not limited only to these cells types, but can easily be extended to other cellular geometries via the graphical Java-based application we also provide. This particle-based simulation-called the Digital Confocal Microscopy Suite or DCMS-can also perform fluorescence dynamics assays, such as number and brightness, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and raster image correlation spectroscopy, and could help shape the way these techniques are interpreted.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29539401      PMCID: PMC5883553          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  49 in total

1.  Slow diffusion of proteins in the yeast plasma membrane allows polarity to be maintained by endocytic cycling.

Authors:  Javier Valdez-Taubas; Hugh R B Pelham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Minimizing the impact of photoswitching of fluorescent proteins on FRAP analysis.

Authors:  Florian Mueller; Tatsuya Morisaki; Davide Mazza; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Analysis of confocal laser-microscope optics for 3-D fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  H Qian; E L Elson
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Straightforward FRAP for quantitative diffusion measurements with a laser scanning microscope.

Authors:  Hendrik Deschout; Joel Hagman; Sophia Fransson; Jenny Jonasson; Mats Rudemo; Niklas Lorén; Kevin Braeckmans
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo.

Authors:  James G McNally
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 6.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: past, present, future.

Authors:  Elliot L Elson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A generalization of theory for two-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching applicable to confocal laser scanning microscopes.

Authors:  Minchul Kang; Charles A Day; Kimberly Drake; Anne K Kenworthy; Emmanuele DiBenedetto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Protein mobility in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M B Elowitz; M G Surette; P E Wolf; J B Stock; S Leibler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching on the confocal laser-scanning microscope: generalized model without restriction on the size of the photobleached disk.

Authors:  Nick Smisdom; Kevin Braeckmans; Hendrik Deschout; Martin vandeVen; Jean-Michel Rigo; Stefaan C De Smedt; Marcel Ameloot
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Lifeact-mEGFP reveals a dynamic apical F-actin network in tip growing plant cells.

Authors:  Luis Vidali; Caleb M Rounds; Peter K Hepler; Magdalena Bezanilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantifying Dynamics in Phase-Separated Condensates Using Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching.

Authors:  Nicole O Taylor; Ming-Tzo Wei; Howard A Stone; Clifford P Brangwynne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The Trap in the FRAP: A Cautionary Tale about Transport Measurements in Biomolecular Condensates.

Authors:  Andrea Soranno
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  In vivo interactions between myosin XI, vesicles and filamentous actin are fast and transient in Physcomitrella patens.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Bibeau; Fabienne Furt; S Iman Mousavi; James L Kingsley; Max F Levine; Erkan Tüzel; Luis Vidali
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.