Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine whether heat waves are associated with increased frequency of clinic visits for ICD-9 codes of illnesses traditionally associated with heat waves. Methods: During 4 years of family medicine clinic data between 2012 and 2016, we identified six heat wave events in San Diego County. For each heat wave event, we selected a control period in the same season that was twice as long. Scheduling a visit on a heat wave day (versus a non-heat wave day) was the primary predictor, and receiving a primary ICD-9 disease code related to heat waves was the outcome. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity and marital status. Results: Of the 5448 visits across the heat wave and control periods, 6.4% of visits (n = 346) were for heat wave-related diagnoses. Scheduling a visit on heat wave day was not associated with receiving a heat wave-related ICD code as compared with the control period (adjusted odds ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.36; P = 0.51). Discussion: We show that in a relatively large and demographically diverse population, patients who schedule appointments during heat waves are not being more frequently seen for diagnoses typically associated with heat waves in the acute setting. Given that heat waves are increasing in frequency due to climate change, there is an opportunity to increase utilization of primary care clinics during heat waves.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine whether heat waves are associated with increased frequency of clinic visits for ICD-9 codes of illnesses traditionally associated with heat waves. Methods: During 4 years of family medicine clinic data between 2012 and 2016, we identified six heat wave events in San Diego County. For each heat wave event, we selected a control period in the same season that was twice as long. Scheduling a visit on a heat wave day (versus a non-heat wave day) was the primary predictor, and receiving a primary ICD-9 disease code related to heat waves was the outcome. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity and marital status. Results: Of the 5448 visits across the heat wave and control periods, 6.4% of visits (n = 346) were for heat wave-related diagnoses. Scheduling a visit on heat wave day was not associated with receiving a heat wave-related ICD code as compared with the control period (adjusted odds ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.36; P = 0.51). Discussion: We show that in a relatively large and demographically diverse population, patients who schedule appointments during heat waves are not being more frequently seen for diagnoses typically associated with heat waves in the acute setting. Given that heat waves are increasing in frequency due to climate change, there is an opportunity to increase utilization of primary care clinics during heat waves.
Authors: Jonathan De Blois; Tord Kjellstrom; Stefan Agewall; Justin A Ezekowitz; Paul W Armstrong; Dan Atar Journal: Cardiology Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 1.869
Authors: Drahomir Aujesky; Pierre-Marie Roy; Franck Verschuren; Marc Righini; Joseph Osterwalder; Michael Egloff; Bertrand Renaud; Peter Verhamme; Roslyn A Stone; Catherine Legall; Olivier Sanchez; Nathan A Pugh; Alfred N'gako; Jacques Cornuz; Olivier Hugli; Hans-Jürg Beer; Arnaud Perrier; Michael J Fine; Donald M Yealy Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Stafoggia; F Forastiere; D Agostini; N Caranci; F de'Donato; M Demaria; P Michelozzi; R Miglio; M Rognoni; A Russo; C A Perucci Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Kim Knowlton; Miriam Rotkin-Ellman; Galatea King; Helene G Margolis; Daniel Smith; Gina Solomon; Roger Trent; Paul English Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Derick A Akompab; Peng Bi; Susan Williams; Janet Grant; Iain A Walker; Martha Augoustinos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mahmoud Alsaiqali; Katrien De Troeyer; Lidia Casas; Rafiq Hamdi; Christel Faes; Gijs Van Pottelbergh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 3.390