Literature DB >> 29538259

Initiating Maintenance Dialysis Before Living Kidney Donor Transplantation When a Donor Candidate Evaluation Is Well Underway.

Steven Habbous1, Eric McArthur2, Stephanie N Dixon1,2, Susan McKenzie3,4, Carlos Garcia-Ochoa1, Ngan N Lam5, Krista L Lentine6, Christine Dipchand7, Kenneth Litchfield3, Mehmet A Begen1,8, Sisira Sarma1, Amit X Garg1,2,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preemptive kidney transplants result in better outcomes and patient experiences than transplantation after dialysis onset. It is unknown how often a person initiates maintenance dialysis before living kidney donor transplantation when their donor candidate evaluation is well underway.
METHODS: Using healthcare databases, we retrospectively studied 478 living donor kidney transplants from 2004 to 2014 across 5 transplant centers in Ontario, Canada, where the recipients were not receiving dialysis when their donor's evaluation was well underway. We also explored some factors associated with a higher likelihood of dialysis initiation before transplant.
RESULTS: A total of 167 (35%) of 478 persons with kidney failure initiated dialysis in a median of 9.7 months (25th-75th percentile, 5.4-18.7 months) after their donor candidate began their evaluation and received dialysis for a median of 8.8 months (3.6-16.9 months) before kidney transplantation. The total cohort's dialysis cost was CAD $8.1 million, and 44 (26%) of 167 recipients initiated their dialysis urgently in hospital. The median total donor evaluation time (time from evaluation start to donation) was 10.6 months (6.4-21.6 months) for preemptive transplants and 22.4 months (13.1-38.7 months) for donors whose recipients started dialysis before transplant. Recipients were more likely to start dialysis if their donor was female, nonwhite, lived in a lower-income neighborhood, and if the transplant center received the recipient referral later.
CONCLUSION: One third of persons initiated dialysis before receiving their living kidney donor transplant, despite their donor's evaluation being well underway. Future studies should consider whether some of these events can be prevented by addressing inappropriate delays to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29538259      PMCID: PMC7228642          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  27 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The Irish living kidney donor program - why potential donors do not proceed to live kidney donation?

Authors:  Dervla M Connaughton; Grainne Harmon; Anne Cooney; Yvonne Williams; John O'Regan; Derek O'Neill; Phyllis Cunningham; Aileen Counihan; Patrick O'Kelly; Siobhan McHale; Mark Denton; Conall M O'Seaghdha; Colm Magee; Peter Conlon; Dilly Little; Mary Keogan; Declan G de Freitas
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors 2014.

Authors:  Robert Richardson; Maureen Connelly; Christine Dipchand; Amit X Garg; Anand Ghanekar; Isabelle Houde; Olwyn Johnston; Rahul Mainra; Ruth McCarrell; Thomas Mueller; Peter Nickerson; Christine Pippy; Leroy Storsley; Kathryn Tinckam; Linda Wright; Serdar Yilmaz; David Landsberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Becoming a live kidney donor.

Authors:  Annabel Ferriman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-14

5.  Cigarette smoking in living kidney donors: donor and recipient outcomes.

Authors:  Patrick W Underwood; Kyle H Sheetz; David C Cron; Michael N Terjimanian; Michael J Englesbe; Seth A Waits
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome.

Authors:  H U Meier-Kriesche; F K Port; A O Ojo; S M Rudich; J A Hanson; D M Cibrik; A B Leichtman; B Kaplan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation: considerations of equity and utility.

Authors:  Morgan E Grams; B Po-Han Chen; Josef Coresh; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Duration of Living Kidney Transplant Donor Evaluations: Findings From 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Jennifer Arnold; Mehmet A Begen; Neil Boudville; Matthew Cooper; Christine Dipchand; Stephanie N Dixon; Liane S Feldman; Dariusz Goździk; Martin Karpinski; Scott Klarenbach; Greg A Knoll; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Charmaine Lok; Eric McArthur; Susan McKenzie; Matthew Miller; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Chris Nguan; G V Ramesh Prasad; Sebastian Przech; Sisira Sarma; Dorry L Segev; Leroy Storsley; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Deonna R Moore; David Serur; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; James R Rodrigue; Rebecca Hays; Matthew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Transition from donor candidates to live kidney donors: the impact of race and undiagnosed medical disease states.

Authors:  Silas P Norman; Peter X K Song; Youna Hu; Akinlolu O Ojo
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.863

View more
  5 in total

1.  Preemptive Kidney Transplantation: What's the Hold Up?

Authors:  William Gourlay
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Chronic dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: Relevance to kidney xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Jagdale; David K C Cooper; Hayato Iwase; Robert S Gaston
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  A RAND-Modified Delphi on Key Indicators to Measure the Efficiency of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Lianne Barnieh; Kenneth Litchfield; Susan McKenzie; Marian Reich; Ngan N Lam; Istvan Mucsi; Ann Bugeja; Seychelle Yohanna; Rahul Mainra; Kate Chong; Daniel Fantus; G V Ramesh Prasad; Christine Dipchand; Jagbir Gill; Leah Getchell; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Justin Woo; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Matthew Cooper; Marian Reich; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-20

5.  Can Split Renal Volume Assessment by Computed Tomography Replace Nuclear Split Renal Function in Living Kidney Donor Evaluations? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Carlos Garcia-Ochoa; Gary Brahm; Chris Nguan; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.