| Literature DB >> 29537847 |
John R Horton1,2, Xu Liu2, Lizhen Wu3, Kai Zhang3, John Shanks2, Xing Zhang1, Ganesha Rai4, Bryan T Mott4, Daniel J Jansen4, Stephen C Kales4, Mark J Henderson4, Katherine Pohida4, Yuhong Fang4, Xin Hu4, Ajit Jadhav4, David J Maloney4, Matthew D Hall4, Anton Simeonov4, Haian Fu, Paula M Vertino, Qin Yan3, Xiaodong Cheng1,2.
Abstract
Isomers of chiral drugs can exhibit marked differences in biological activities. We studied the binding and inhibitory activities of 12 compounds against KDM5A. Among them are two pairs of enantiomers representing two distinct inhibitor chemotypes, namely, ( R)- and ( S)-2-((2-chlorophenyl)(2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethoxy)methyl)-1 H-pyrrolo[3,2- b]pyridine-7-carboxylic acid (compounds N51 and N52) and ( R) - and ( S) -N-(1-(3-isopropyl-1 H-pyrazole-5-carbonyl)pyrrolidin-3-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (compounds N54 and N55). In vitro, the S enantiomer of the N51/N52 pair (N52) and the R enantiomer of the N54/N55 pair (N54) exhibited about 4- to 5-fold greater binding affinity. The more potent enzyme inhibition of KDM5A by the R-isoform for the cell-permeable N54/N55 pair translated to differences in growth inhibitory activity. We determined structures of the KDM5A catalytic domain in complex with all 12 inhibitors, which revealed the interactions (or lack thereof) responsible for the differences in binding affinity. These results provide insights to guide improvements in binding potency and avenues for development of cell permeable inhibitors of the KDM5 family.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29537847 PMCID: PMC6322411 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Chem ISSN: 0022-2623 Impact factor: 7.446