Jennyfer Wolf1, Paul R Hunter2,3, Matthew C Freeman4, Oliver Cumming5, Thomas Clasen4, Jamie Bartram6, Julian P T Higgins7, Richard Johnston1, Kate Medlicott1, Sophie Boisson1, Annette Prüss-Ustün1. 1. Department of Public Health, Environment and Social Determinants of Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. The Norwich School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa. 4. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 6. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 7. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Safe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene are protective against diarrhoeal disease; a leading cause of child mortality. The main objective was an updated assessment of the impact of unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) on childhood diarrhoeal disease. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of articles published between 1970 and February 2016. Study results were combined and analysed using meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: A total of 135 studies met the inclusion criteria. Several water, sanitation and hygiene interventions were associated with lower risk of diarrhoeal morbidity. Point-of-use filter interventions with safe storage reduced diarrhoea risk by 61% (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.48); piped water to premises of higher quality and continuous availability by 75% and 36% (RR = 0.25 (0.09, 0.67) and 0.64 (0.42, 0.98)), respectively compared to a baseline of unimproved drinking water; sanitation interventions by 25% (RR = 0.75 (0.63, 0.88)) with evidence for greater reductions when high sanitation coverage is reached; and interventions promoting handwashing with soap by 30% (RR = 0.70 (0.64, 0.77)) vs. no intervention. Results of the analysis of sanitation and hygiene interventions are sensitive to certain differences in study methods and conditions. Correcting for non-blinding would reduce the associations with diarrhoea to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence is limited, results suggest that household connections of water supply and higher levels of community coverage for sanitation appear particularly impactful which is in line with targets of the Sustainable Development Goals.
OBJECTIVES: Safe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene are protective against diarrhoeal disease; a leading cause of child mortality. The main objective was an updated assessment of the impact of unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) on childhood diarrhoeal disease. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of articles published between 1970 and February 2016. Study results were combined and analysed using meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: A total of 135 studies met the inclusion criteria. Several water, sanitation and hygiene interventions were associated with lower risk of diarrhoeal morbidity. Point-of-use filter interventions with safe storage reduced diarrhoea risk by 61% (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.48); piped water to premises of higher quality and continuous availability by 75% and 36% (RR = 0.25 (0.09, 0.67) and 0.64 (0.42, 0.98)), respectively compared to a baseline of unimproved drinking water; sanitation interventions by 25% (RR = 0.75 (0.63, 0.88)) with evidence for greater reductions when high sanitation coverage is reached; and interventions promoting handwashing with soap by 30% (RR = 0.70 (0.64, 0.77)) vs. no intervention. Results of the analysis of sanitation and hygiene interventions are sensitive to certain differences in study methods and conditions. Correcting for non-blinding would reduce the associations with diarrhoea to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence is limited, results suggest that household connections of water supply and higher levels of community coverage for sanitation appear particularly impactful which is in line with targets of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Authors: G Kayser; J F Loret; K Setty; C Blaudin De Thé; J Martin; C Puigdomenech; J Bartram Journal: Urban Water J Date: 2019-09-29 Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Sarah L McGuinness; Joanne O'Toole; Darshini Ayton; Asha Giriyan; Chetan A Gaonkar; Ramkrishna Vhaval; Allen C Cheng; Karin Leder Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sarah L McGuinness; Joanne O'Toole; Andrew B Forbes; Thomas B Boving; Kavita Patil; Fraddry D'Souza; Chetan A Gaonkar; Asha Giriyan; S Fiona Barker; Allen C Cheng; Martha Sinclair; Karin Leder Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sian White; Thomas Heath; Waleed Khalid Ibrahim; Dilveen Ihsan; Karl Blanchet; Val Curtis; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rachel Peletz; Caroline Delaire; Joan Kones; Clara MacLeod; Edinah Samuel; Alicea Easthope-Frazer; Ranjiv Khush Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Naomi E Clarke; Clare E F Dyer; Salvador Amaral; Garyn Tan; Susana Vaz Nery Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Santosh Jatrana; Md Mehedi Hasan; Abdullah A Mamun; Yaqoot Fatima Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390