Literature DB >> 29537658

Efficiency of the modified Sims maternal position in the rotation of persistent occiput posterior position during labor: A randomized clinical trial.

Vanessa Bueno-Lopez1, Carmen Fuentelsaz-Gallego2, Manel Casellas-Caro3, Ana Maria Falgueras-Serrano1, Silvia Crespo-Berros1, Ana Maria Silvano-Cocinero1, Carolina Alcaine-Guisado1, Manuela Zamoro Fuentes1, Elena Carreras1, Carmen Terré-Rull4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal occiput posterior position in labor is associated with more painful and prolonged labor, and an increase in both maternal and fetal morbidity. The aim of this study is to assess whether the modified Sims position on the side of the fetal spine increases the rotation to occiput anterior position in women with epidural analgesia and a fetus in persistent occiput posterior (POP) position.
METHODS: This is an open, randomized controlled, clinical trial. One hundred and twenty women in labor with fetuses in POP position were included. The diagnosis was performed through digital vaginal examination and confirmed with an ultrasound scan. Women were randomized into the free position group or the modified Sims on the side of the fetal spine. The primary outcome was rotation to occiput anterior, and secondary outcomes were type of delivery, postpartum perineal condition, perinatal results, and maternal satisfaction.
RESULTS: In pregnant women undergoing labor in the Sims position, fetuses in POP rotated to occiput anterior in 50.8% of cases, whilst in the free position group, the rotation occurred in 21.7% (P = .001). The rate of vaginal deliveries was higher in the Sims group compared with the free position group (84.7% vs 68.3%, P = .035). DISCUSSION: The modified Sims position is a maternal posture intervention efficient in POP rotation, which decreases cesarean delivery rate. It is a simple and noninvasive intervention, reproducible, and well tolerated by pregnant women.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery; fetal occiput posterior position; labor; maternal postures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537658     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  4 in total

Review 1.  Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants.

Authors:  Jennifer A Barrowclough; Luling Lin; Bridget Kool; G Justus Hofmeyr; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 2.  A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Yu Zang; Li-Hua Ren; Feng-Juan Li; Hong Lu
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-06-20

3.  Pregnant women's views on the acceptability, enablers, and barriers of participation in a randomized controlled trial of maternal posture for fetal malposition in labor.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrowclough; Bridget Kool; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Li Wang; Hongxia Wang; Lu Jia; Wenjie Qing; Fan Li; Jie Zhou
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.