Literature DB >> 29537460

Triple Aim Is Triply Tough: Can You Focus on Three Things at Once?

Katrina E Donahue1, Alfred Reid2, Elizabeth G Baxley3, Charles Carter4, Peter J Carek5, Mark Robinson6, Warren P Newton7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The I3 POP Collaborative sought to improve health of patients attending North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia primary care teaching practices using the triple aim framework of better quality, appropriate utilization, and enhanced patient experience. We examined change in triple aim measures over 3 years, and identified correlates of improvement.
METHODS: Twenty-nine teaching practices representing 23 residency programs participated. The Institute for Health Care Improvement Breakthrough Series Collaborative model was tailored to focus on at least one triple aim goal and programs submitted data annually on all collaborative measures. Outcome measures included quality (chronic illness, prevention); utilization (hospitalization, emergency department visits, referrals) and patient experience (access, continuity). Participant interviews explored supports and barriers to improvement.
RESULTS: Six of 29 practices (21%) were unable to extract measures from their electronic health records (EHR). All of the remaining 23 practices reported improvement in at least one measure, with 11 seeing at least 10% improvement; seven (24%) improved measures in all three triple aim areas, with two experiencing at least 10% improvement. Practices with a greater number of patient visits were more likely to show improved measures (odds ratio [OR] 10.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .68-172.2, P=0.03). Practice interviews revealed that engaged leadership and systems supports were more common in higher performing practices.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous attainment of improvement in all three triple aim goals by teaching practices is difficult. I3 POP practices that were able to pull and report data improved on at least one measure. Future work needs to focus on cultivating leadership and systems supporting large scale improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537460     DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.885946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  4 in total

1.  Variation in Triple Aim Measures: Implications of Clinical Signatures in Family Medicine Residency Programs.

Authors:  Cristen P Page; Alfred Reid; Christina Drostin; Warren P Newton
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-10

2.  Cost Analysis of Integrated Behavioral Health in a Large Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Aubry N Koehler; Edward Ip; Stephen W Davis; Joseph F Hilburn; Richard W Lord; Gail S Marion; Julienne K Kirk
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  The Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Expenditures in Adults with Spine Related Disorders: An Analysis of the 2008 to 2015 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS).

Authors:  Jordan A Gliedt; Rebekah J Walker; Kaiwei Lu; Aprill Z Dawson; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Mapping of the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 to disability weights using the Multi-Country Survey Study on Health and Responsiveness.

Authors:  Joran Lokkerbol; Ben F M Wijnen; Somnath Chatterji; Ronald C Kessler; Dan Chisholm
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.