Carina Carnlöf1, Per Insulander1, Mats Jensen-Urstad1, Marie Iwarzon2, Fredrik Gadler1. 1. a Heart and Vascular Theme , Karolinska Institute of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden. 2. b Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society , Karolinska Institute of Medicine , Huddinge , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore sex differences regarding indication for atrio-ventricular junction ablation (AVJ), choice of pacing system, complications to pacemaker treatment, long-term outcome, and cause of death after AVJ ablation. DESIGN: 700 patients who had undergone AVJ ablation between January 1990 and December 2010 were included. Data were retrieved from the patients´ medical records and the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. Information about admission to hospital and cause of death was retrieved from the National Board of Health and Welfare. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 90 ± 64 months. Indication for AVJ ablation, choice of pacing system, and outcome after AVJ ablation differed between the sexes. The men had more often permanent atrial fibrillation, p = .0001, and a VVIR pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implanted prior to ablation, p = .0001. Heart failure was present in 44% of the men vs. 28% of the women, p = .0001. LVEF decreased slightly in the whole cohort after the AVJ ablation. There were no sex differences in complication rates due to the pacemaker/ICD treatment, p = .3 or mortality due to AVJ ablation. CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with AVJ ablation and pacing, indication, choice of pacing system, and morbidity differed but there were no sex differences regarding survival or primary cause of death found. The main factor influencing survival was age at the time of ablation. Women less often received treatment with ICD and/or CRT when indication was present compared with men.
OBJECTIVES: To explore sex differences regarding indication for atrio-ventricular junction ablation (AVJ), choice of pacing system, complications to pacemaker treatment, long-term outcome, and cause of death after AVJ ablation. DESIGN: 700 patients who had undergone AVJ ablation between January 1990 and December 2010 were included. Data were retrieved from the patients´ medical records and the Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. Information about admission to hospital and cause of death was retrieved from the National Board of Health and Welfare. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 90 ± 64 months. Indication for AVJ ablation, choice of pacing system, and outcome after AVJ ablation differed between the sexes. The men had more often permanent atrial fibrillation, p = .0001, and a VVIR pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implanted prior to ablation, p = .0001. Heart failure was present in 44% of the men vs. 28% of the women, p = .0001. LVEF decreased slightly in the whole cohort after the AVJ ablation. There were no sex differences in complication rates due to the pacemaker/ICD treatment, p = .3 or mortality due to AVJ ablation. CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with AVJ ablation and pacing, indication, choice of pacing system, and morbidity differed but there were no sex differences regarding survival or primary cause of death found. The main factor influencing survival was age at the time of ablation. Women less often received treatment with ICD and/or CRT when indication was present compared with men.
Entities:
Keywords:
AV nodal junction ablation; Atrial fibrillation; heart failure; pacemaker; sex