Vivian Ussui1, Nicolas Kuritzky2, Manuel Berzosa3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach, Florida, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach, Florida, USA. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach, Florida, USA.
Dear Editor,For patients with unresectable pancreatic tumors, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown promising results for local control with reduced toxicity.[1] Fiducials are used in SBRT to allow better localization of the tumor for adequate mapping. Despite the high success rates with metal fiducials,[2] its placement can be technically difficult, particularly with lesions located in the head or uncinate process, and when the scope is torqued. Metal fiducials have limited visibility given their small size, requiring multiple fiducials for a single location, cannot be removed, and have high migration rates.[3] Recent Food and Drug Administration approval of fiducial preloaded needles has overcome safety concerns when backloading fiducials into standard needles, allowing deployment of 1–3 fiducials per endoscopic passage.A new injectable hydrogel made of iodinated polyethylene glycol particles (TraceIT Fiducial Marker, Augmenix Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) has been approved and used as a liquid fiducial on solid tumors.[4] It is reabsorbable, has multimodal visibility, and can be easily injected through small needles into advanced cancer and surrounding soft tissue.[5]We recently reported (Poster Mo1992, presented at Digestive Disease Week 2016; San Diego, CA. Published at Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016, vol 83 (5): AB486-87) two patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, who were deemed not surgical candidates due to vascular involvement and performance status. Both patients underwent hydrogel fiducial placement for palliative SBRT. Procedures were performed under moderate sedation using a linear echoendoscope (GF-UCT180, Olympus, Japan).A 19-gauge standard needle was first primed with the injectable hydrogel marker outside the echoendoscope. The hydrogel was injected in aliquots of 0.1–0.2 cc at a time without repositioning the needle until there was a clear endosonographic visualization of hydrogel blebs within the tumor. The hydrogel appeared hyperechoic on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging [Figure 1]. Although not visible on fluoroscopy, the hydrogel exhibits hyperenhancement on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and reveals radiopacity of approximately 300 Hounsfield units on simulation with computed tomography (CT) imaging and cone-beam CT. All patients received periprocedural prophylactic antibiotics. No major complications were noted. The liquid fiducial allowed adequate radiation simulation, including motion studies. Onboard imaging during radiation treatment with cone-beam CT visualized the implanted hydrogel marker allowing real-time registration of images and accurate targeting of the tumor. Both patients successfully received a total of 33 Gray (Gy) under SBRT protocol.
Figure 1
Adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas after injection of hydrogel. Noticed hyperechoic features of the hydrogel within the mass
Adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas after injection of hydrogel. Noticed hyperechoic features of the hydrogel within the massEUS-guided delivery of a new liquid fiducial into pancreatic cancer appears to be feasible, providing adequate visualization of the marker during EUS placement and most importantly during mapping and image guidance during stereotactic radiotherapy. Compared to metal fiducials, it appears to have less artifact on cone-beam pretreatment mapping, it can be delivered with smaller gauge needles, and with one single puncture, the targeted area can be completely delineated with just needle repositioning within the tumor. This novel hydrogel fiducial can become an alternative to metal fiducial to aid on SBRT. Further studies are necessary to assess long-term outcomes, safety, and cost, particularly when compared to standard metal fiducials.
Authors: Mouen A Khashab; Katherine J Kim; Erik J Tryggestad; Aaron T Wild; Teboh Roland; Vikesh K Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Eun Ji Shin; Mark A Ziegler; Reem Z Sharaiha; Marcia Irene Canto; Joseph M Herman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Melanie Machiels; Jeanin van Hooft; Peng Jin; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hanneke M van Laarhoven; Tanja Alderliesten; Maarten C Hulshof Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Sílvia Leite; Teresa Moreira; Ana Caldeira; Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro; Nuno Nunes Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-07-28
Authors: Silvia Carrara; Mihai Rimbas; Alberto Larghi; Milena Di Leo; Tiziana Comito; Joseph Abi Jaoude; Cullen M Taniguchi; Christoph F Dietrich; Manoop S Bhutani; Stephan Hollerbach Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.628