Literature DB >> 29536951

EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: Approach to a challenging procedure.

Judith E Baars1, Fei Chen1, Charbel Sandroussi2, Arthur J Kaffes1, Payal Saxena1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536951      PMCID: PMC6106148          DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_104_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound        ISSN: 2226-7190            Impact factor:   5.628


× No keyword cloud information.
Endoscopic removal of pancreatic stones is challenging because pancreatic stones tend to be spiculated and hard and are impacted behind strictures in most cases.[1] Success rate of stone retrieval by standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is only about 50%. Adding shockwave corporeal lithotripsy or ESWL increases the success rate to 60%–70%, but this is not always available. Unlike in the bile duct where percutaneous salvage is readily available, no alternative sort of surgery exists for pancreatic drainage. Therefore, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) has been gaining popularity because of reasonably high technical success rate and a favorable safety profile in expert hands. The current indications of EUS-PDD include chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic duct obstruction such as due to strictures or stones, disconnected pancreatic duct, and inaccessible major and minor papilla by ERCP such as in surgical postanatomical alteration, malignant pancreatic duct obstruction, and postsurgical pancreaticoenterostomy stricture.[2] EUS-PDD can be performed into two ways: EUS-guided rendezvous of the pancreatic duct or EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy or anterograde stenting.[3] We have thus far performed four cases of EUS-PDD in our center, all with good clinical outcome. Two of which were for obstructing pancreatic duct stones with recurrent pancreatitis post-Whipple's and one for obstructed pancreatic duct due to pancreatic head cancer who failed ERCP. The fourth patient is presented in this video, which shows the case of a 75-year-old male who presented with chronic pancreatitis with obstructing calculi in the head and dilated pancreatic duct in the neck, body, and tail. ERCP for stone removal was unsuccessful, and ESWL was not available. Due to his comorbidities, the patient was deemed as a poor surgical candidate. Hence, EUS-PDD was performed successfully [Figure 1]. This video demonstrates EUS-PDD, which has been shown to be safe and effective in our small case series.
Figure 1

A 75-year-old male who presented with chronic pancreatitis with obstructing calculi in the head and dilated pancreatic duct in the neck, body, and tail for which eus-guided pancreatic duct drainage was performed.

A 75-year-old male who presented with chronic pancreatitis with obstructing calculi in the head and dilated pancreatic duct in the neck, body, and tail for which eus-guided pancreatic duct drainage was performed.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initial will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: technical approaches to a challenging procedure.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Payal Saxena; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Yamile Haito-Chavez; Majidah Bukhari; Everson Artifon; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions in special situations.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 3.  Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Pancreatic Duct Drainage: The Basics of When and How to Perform EUS-Guided Pancreatic Duct Interventions.

Authors:  Christopher G Chapman; Irving Waxman; Uzma D Siddiqui
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-03-25
  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic EUS: New tools, new devices, new applications.

Authors:  Barbara Braden; Vipin Gupta; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.