Literature DB >> 29536924

Challenges and opportunities from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) research summit on improving diagnosis: a proceedings review.

Kerm Henriksen1, Chris Dymek2, Michael I Harrison3, P Jeffrey Brady4, Sharon B Arnold5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Improving Diagnosis in Health Care report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) provided an opportunity for many groups to reflect on the role they could play in taking actions to improve diagnostic safety. As part of its own process, AHRQ held a research summit in the fall of 2016, inviting members from a diverse collection of organizations, both inside and outside of Government, to share their suggestions regarding what is known about diagnosis and the challenges that need to be addressed. CONTENT: The goals of the summit were to learn from the insights of participants; examine issues associated with definitions of diagnostic error and gaps in the evidence base; explore clinician and patient perspectives; gain a better understanding of data and measurement, health information technology, and organizational factors that impact the diagnostic process; and identify potential future directions for research. Summary and outlook: Plenary sessions focused on the state of the new diagnostic safety discipline followed by breakout sessions on the use of data and measurement, health information technology, and the role of organizational factors. The proceedings review captures many of the key challenges and areas deserving further research, revealing stimulating yet complex issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; diagnostic error; diagnostic process; health information technology; measurement; organizational factors; patient safety; research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29536924     DOI: 10.1515/dx-2017-0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)        ISSN: 2194-802X


  3 in total

1.  Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data.

Authors:  Ava L Liberman; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  In response to Ledford and colleagues Toward a Model of Shared Meaningful Diagnosis: How to capture a shared, meaningful diagnosis?

Authors:  Kelly Gleason; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  Advancing Diagnostic Safety Research: Results of a Systematic Research Priority Setting Exercise.

Authors:  Laura Zwaan; Robert El-Kareh; Ashley N D Meyer; Jacky Hooftman; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.