Literature DB >> 29536768

Iodine-mediated one-pot intramolecular decarboxylation domino reaction for accessing functionalised 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)anilines with carbonic anhydrase inhibitory action.

Srinivas Angapelly1, P V Sri Ramya1, Rohini Sodhi1, Andrea Angeli2, Krishnan Rangan3, Narayana Nagesh4, Claudiu T Supuran2, Mohammed Arifuddin1.   

Abstract

A practical and transition metal-free one-pot domino synthesis of diversified (1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)anilines has been developed employing isatins and hydrazides as the starting materials, in the presence of molecular iodine. The prominent feature of this domino process involves consecutive condensation, hydrolytic ring cleavage, and an intramolecular decarboxylation, in a one-pot process that leads to the oxidative formation of a C-O bond. Fluorescence properties of some of the representative molecules obtained in this way were studied. The synthesised 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulphonamides (8a-o) were screened for their carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) inhibitory activity. Most of the compounds exhibited low micromolar to nanomolar activity against human (h) isoforms hCA I, hCA II, hCA IV, and XII, with some compounds displaying selective CA inhibitory activity towards hCA II with KIs of 6.4-17.6 nM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,3,4-oxadiazole; Domino synthesis; carbonic anhydrase; iodine; sulphonamide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536768      PMCID: PMC6010027          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1443447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

Construction of O–heterocyclic ring systems via intramolecular C–O bond formation has become an emerging tool in drug discovery. Accordingly, many efforts have been devoted to this activity, and remarkable results have been achieved to date. Among these, the traditional intramolecular Pd-catalysed Hartwig–Buchwald and copper-catalysed Ullmann-type C–O coupling of aryl halides with hydroxyl moieties, and in an alternative approach, the direct dehydrogenative coupling occurs between C–H and O–H bonds, leading to various functionalised compounds. In most cases, these elaborative designs implied complex catalytic systems (based on Pd(II), Cu(II), Rh(III), and Ru(III) derivatives) and multi-step processes for the preparation of diversely functionalised derivatives, such as, furan, pyrrole, pyrazole, isoquinoline, indole, benzoxazole, and carbazole ring systems. However, oxidative decarboxylation leading to construction of C–heteroatom bonds, particularly the C–O and the C–N bonds, has received significantly less attention. In recent years, in the perspective of green chemistry, most of the organic chemists have switched to metal-free reactions to reduce the burden of toxicity. In this context, iodine and hypervalent iodine reagents have emerged as inexpensive, versatile, and environmentally more friendly reagents. Structural features and the reactivity pattern of these iodine compounds in many aspects are similar to those of the transition metal compounds applied for such purposes. Up until now, many efforts have been made to directly functionalise C–H bonds for the construction of CC and C–heteroatoms bonds by employing iodine or hypervalent iodine reagents,. Wang et al. demonstrated a facile access to various heterocycles (quinazoline, oxazole, and pyridine) through the tandem oxidative coupling reactions using iodine as catalyst and tert-butyl-hydroperoxide (TBHP) as the oxidant. Furthermore, Ma et al. proposed the synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines via oxidative coupling of 2-aminopyridine with 1,3-diketones in the presence of tetra-butylammonium iodide (TBAI), TBHP, and BF3·etherate. Very recently Tang et al. reported iodine-catalysed radical oxidative annulation for the synthesis of dihydrofurans and indolisines. Interestingly, I2 (or hypervalent iodine derivatives) also promoted the oxidative decarboxylation of amino acids and β,γ-unsaturated carboxylic acids. Intrigued by these advances, herein we envisioned a metal-free, iodine-mediated domino strategy involving intramolecular decarboxylative coupling of isatins, and hydrazides for the synthesis of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline derivatives (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

Transition metal-free domino oxidative decarboxylation for the formation of 1,3,4-oxadiazole.

Transition metal-free domino oxidative decarboxylation for the formation of 1,3,4-oxadiazole. 1,3,4-Oxadiazole motif is an important five-membered aromatic heterocyclic ring present in many bioactive molecules,, including anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, antiviral, anticonvulsant, analgesic, and antifungal agents,. Some of the drugs and drug candidates, such as raltegravir, zibotentan, furamizole, and ABT-751-oxadiazole possessing 1,3,4-oxadiazole moieties are depicted in Figure 1. Apart from biology, their applications have also been extended to material chemistry due to their unique optoelectronic properties.
Figure 1.

Some of the bioactive compounds containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety.

Some of the bioactive compounds containing 1,3,4-oxadiazole moiety. To date, a number of synthetic protocols have been described in the literature to access 1,3,4-oxadiazoles. They include: (i) oxidative cyclisation of N-acylhydrazones with FeCl3, CAN, PbO2, hypervalent iodines, chloramine T, KMnO4, Br2, HgO/I2; (ii) From 1,2-diacylhydrazones via cyclodehydration by employing PPA, POCl3, SOCl2, and H2SO4; (iii) Arylation of preformed 2-substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles through C–H activation. Additionally, Guin et al. successfully accomplished 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from N-arylidenearoyl hydrazides using Cu(OTf)2. Recently, Xu et al. demonstrated an easy access to synthesise 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)anilines by employing CuI as the catalyst. Nevertheless, the problems associated with these protocols, including the use of expensive, hazardous materials, or inefficient multi-step processes endowed them with a limited applicability. Therefore, more general and eco-friendly strategies for the synthesis of functionalised 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from easily available starting materials are still highly desirable. This prompted us to explore a simpler and more efficient protocol which is reported in this article.

Materials and methods

Chemistry

All solvents were purified and dried using standard methods prior to use. Commercially available reagents were used without further purification. All reactions involving air- or moisture-sensitive compounds were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere using dried glassware and syringe techniques to transfer solutions. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on Merck silica gel 60 F-254 aluminium plates. Melting points were determined on Stuart digital melting-point apparatus/SMP 30 in open capillary tubes and uncorrected. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR, 13 C-NMR) spectra were recorded using an Avance Bruker 500 MHz, 125 MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6. Chemical shifts reported in parts per million (ppm) with TMS as an internal reference, and the coupling constants (J) expressed in hertz (Hz). Splitting patterns are denoted as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet; dd, doublet of doublet. HRMS were determined with Agilent QTOF mass spectrometer 6540 series instrument and were performed in the ESI techniques at 70 eV.

General procedure for the preparation of 2–(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) aniline derivatives (3a–u), (6a–g), and (8a–o)

A glass tube charged with a mixture of the desired isatin (0.5 mmol), aryl or heteroaryl hydrazide (0.5 mmol), I2 (100 mol%), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.), and then 3 ml of DMSO at room temperature, was sealed and the resulting mixture was stirred under microwave irradiation at 160 °C until the disappearance of the reactants (monitored by TLC in 20% EtOAc and hexane). Iodine was then quenched by the addition of 10% aqueous Na2S2O3 and the product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 25 ml). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on 60–120 silica gel using a mixture of EtOAc (bp 77 °C) and petroleum ether (bp 42–60 °C) as eluent to afford the desired product (correspondingly, 3a–3u/6a–6g/8a–o) as a yellow solid (yield, 69–92%).

2-(5-(p-Tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3a)

Yellow solid, Yield: 114 mg (91%), m.p 174–175 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.02 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (dd, J = 23.7, 7.5 Hz, 3H), 6.79 (dd, J = 14.7, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 5.89 (s, 2H), and 2.44 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.5, 162.6, 148.2, 142.6, 132.9, 130.4, 128.2, 127.0, 120.9, 116.3, 116.1, 104.5, and 21.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C15H14N3O 252.1131, found 252.1136.

2-(5-(4-Methoxy-2-methylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3b)

Yellow solid, Yield: 126 mg (90%), m.p 148.5–150 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.02 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.25 (m, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (s, 2H), 6.73–6.68 (m, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), and 2.68 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 163.8, 162.7, 161.8, 148.2, 140.30, 132.80, 131.13, 128.1, 117.3, 116.3, 116.0, 115.3, 112.6, 104.6, 55.8, and 22.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C16H16N3O2 282.1237, found 282.1240.

2-(5-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3c)

Yellow solid, Yield: 149 mg (91%), m.p 169–171 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.94 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (s, 2H), 7.30 (ddd, J = 8.5, 7.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (dd, J = 8.3, 0.6 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (s, 2H), 6.75–6.69 (ddd,.1H), 3.92 (s, 6H), 3.77 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.7, 162.4, 153.9, 148.3, 141.0, 133.0, 128.4, 118.9, 116.3, 115.9, 104.5, 104.4, 60.7, and 56.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C17H18F3N3O4 328.1292, found 328.1291.

2-(5-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 129 mg (84%), m.p 195–197 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (s, 2H), and 6.72 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.3, 161.4, 148.5, 133.2, 128.3, 127.9, 126.7 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 125.3, 123.1, 116.4, 116.0, and 104.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H11F3N3O 306.0849, found 306.0846.

2-(5-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3e)

Yellow solid, Yield: 106 mg (83%), m.p 170–172 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.84 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.19 (m, 2H), 6.80 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.8 Hz, 2H), and 5.83 (s, 2H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 165.7, 163.77, 162.00, 147.1, 132.6, 129.20 (d, J = 8.9 Hz), 127.7, 120.24 (d, J = 3.3 Hz), 116.8, 116.5, 116.3, and 105.61. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H11FN3O 256.0881, found 256.0878.

2-(5-(4-Bbromophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3f)

Yellow solid, Yield: 134 mg (85%), m.p 186–187 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.10–8.06 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.82 (m, 3H), 7.30 (ddd, J = 8.5, 7.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), and 6.74–6.69 (m, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.9, 161.8, 148.4, 133.1, 132.9, 129.0, 128.3, 125.9, 123.0, 116.4, 116.0, and 104.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H11BrN3O 316.0080, found 316.0078.

2-(5-(3,5-Dichlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3g)

Yellow solid, Yield: 126 mg (83%), m.p 210–212 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.16 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (ddd, J = 8.5, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J = 8.4, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (s, 2H), and 6.73–6.68 (m, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.4, 160.5, 148.5, 135.6, 133.3, 131.64, 128.7, 127.0, 125.5, 116.3, 116.0, and 104.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calculated for C14H10Cl2N3O 306.0915, found 306.0918.

2-(5-(2-Methyl-5-nitrophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3i)

Yellow solid, Yield: 120 mg (81%), m.p 186.5–188 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.12 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00–7.96 (m, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (s, 2H), 6.73–6.66 (m, 1H), 2.52 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.4, 159.3, 148.4, 146.2, 145.3, 133.9, 133.4, 132.0, 128.0, 125.3, 117.6, 116.5, 116.1, 103.8, and 21.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H13N4O3 297.0982, found 297.0976.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3j)

Yellow solid, Yield: 137 mg (81%), m.p 196–198 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.34 (t, J = 44.9 Hz, 2H), 8.17–7.76 (m, 3H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.2, 161.8, 147.3, 132.9, 128.16, 127.45, 127.19, 126.7 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 125.33, 119.26, 118.3, and 105.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+calculated for C15H10ClF3N3O 340.0459, found 340.0462.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3k)

Yellow solid, Yield: 117 mg (81%), m.p 176–177.5 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.29–8.23 (m, 2H), 7.91 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.31 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (s, 2H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.67, 163.78, 162.0, 147.1, 132.7, 130.0 (d, J = 9.1 Hz), 127.1, 120.0 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 119.2, 118.2, 117.1, 116.9, and 105.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H10ClFN3O 290.0941, found 290.0939.

2-(5-(4-Bromophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-chloroaniline (3l)

Yellow solid, Yield: 145 mg (83%), m.p 196–197 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.17–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.93 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.87–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97–6.91 (m, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 163.9, 162.2, 147.2, 132.9, 132.8, 129.2, 127.1, 126.1, 122.9, 119.2, 118.2, and 105.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H10BrClN3O 349.9690, found 349.9698.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3m)

Yellow solid, Yield: 137 mg (81%), m.p 229–231 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.24 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97–6.92 (m, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.4, 160.8, 147.3, 135.6, 133.06, 131.7, 127.4, 126.8, 125.75, 119.35, 118.2, and 105.06. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H9Cl3N3O 339.9806, found 339.9811.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(5-methoxy-2-methylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3n)

Yellow solid, Yield: 140 mg (89%), m.p 158–15.5 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.99–6.90 (m, 4H), 3.84 (s, 3H), and 2.67 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 162.9, 162.74, 161.8, 147.0, 140.4, 132.4, 131.3, 126.9, 119.1, 118.1, 117.3, 115.1, 112.6, 105.6, 55.87, and 22.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C16H15ClN3O2 316.0847, found 316.0844.

4-Bromo-2-(5-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3o)

Yellow solid, Yield: 157 mg (82%), m.p 167–168 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.40 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 8.09–7.93 (m, 3H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (s, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.2, 161.8, 147.6, 135.6, 130.0, 128.1, 127.4, 126.74 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 125.3, 118.6, 106.2, and 105.85. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H10BrF3N3O 383.9984, found 383.9990.

2-(5-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-fluoroaniline (3p)

Yellow solid, Yield: 139 mg (88%), m.p 152–154 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.78 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (td, J = 8.7, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 2H), 3.87 (s, 6H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.1 (d, J = 2.6 Hz), 162.6, 161.4, 154.5, 152.7, 145.2, 125.2, 120.8 (d, J = 22.5 Hz), 117.8 (d, J = 7.4 Hz), 113.4 (d, J = 24.4 Hz), 105.4, 104.4, 104.01 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), and 56.11 (s). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C16H15FN3O3 316.1092, found 316.1094.

2-(5-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethoxy)aniline (3q)

Yellow solid, Yield: 129 mg (80%), m.p 183–184 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.30–8.23 (m, 18H), 7.87 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 8H), 7.48 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 18H), 7.32 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz, 9H), 7.02 (s, 5H), 7.00 (s, 17H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.6, 163.7 (d, J = 9.4 Hz), 162.1, 147.5, 138.1 (d, J = 2.0 Hz), 130.1 (d, J = 9.2 Hz), 126.5, 121.8, 120.9, 120.3 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 119.8, 117.6, 117.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz), and 104.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H10F4N3O2 340.0755, found 340.0759.

4-(Trifluoromethoxy)-2-(5-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (3r)

Yellow solid, Yield: 172 mg (87%), m.p 203.5–205 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.44 (s, 2H), 7.32 (s, 1H), 7.01 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 6H), 3.77 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 163.7, 162.8, 153.9, 147.4, 141.2, 138.1, 126.4, 121.0, 118.7, 117.6, 104.9, 104.2, 60.7, and 56.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C18H17F3N3O5 411.1166, found 411.1169.

2-(5-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-(trifluoromethoxy)aniline (3s)

Yellow solid, Yield: 144 mg (84%), m.p 199–201 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.78 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (td, J = 8.7, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 2H), 3.87 (s, 6H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 163.6, 163, 147.4, 139.2, 138, 133, 126.4, 124.8, 123.4, 120.9, 117.6, 104.3, and 21.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C17H15F3N3O 350.1162, found 350.1158.

2-(5-(5-Methoxy-2-methylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-nitroaniline (3t)

Yellow solid, Yield: 139 mg (85%), m.p 240–241 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.63 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 8.21–7.92 (m, 4H), 7.10–6.99 (m, 3H), 3.84 (d, J = 20.0 Hz, 3H), 2.67 (d, J = 25.2 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 163.3, 162.2, 162.0, 153.0, 140.5, 136.3, 131.4, 128.0, 125.4, 117.3, 116.2, 114.9, 112.7, 103.9, 55.9, and 22.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C16H15N4O4 327.1088, found 327.1089.

2-(5-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-methoxyaniline (3u)

Yellow solid, Yield: 150 mg (92%), m.p 143.5–145 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.30–8.23 (m, 18H), 7.87 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 8H), 7.48 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 18H), 7.32 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz, 9H), 7.02 (s, 5H), and 7.00 (s, 17H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.80, 162.41, 161.47, 150.35, 143.13, 125.36, 121.72, 118.03, 111.04, 105.08, 104.13, 104.12, 56.19, and 56.08. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C17H18N3O4 328.1292, found 328.1290.

2-(5-(Pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6a)

Yellow solid, Yield: 108 mg (90%), m.p 174–175 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.85 (dd, J = 4.5, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (dd, J = 4.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (ddd, J = 8.5, 7.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 6.76–6.68 (m, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.5, 161.0, 151.3, 148.6, 133.4, 130.9, 128.4, 120.7, 116.5, 116.0, and 104.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C13H11N4O 239.0927, found 239.0928.

2-(5-(Isoquinolin-3-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6b)

Yellow solid, Yield: 126 mg (87%), m.p 256–257 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.43 (s, 1H), 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.13–7.96 (m, 3H), 7.83 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.86–6.79 (m, 2H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.20, 162.55, 153.88, 148.50, 136.96, 135.62, 133.17, 132.25, 130.01, 129.37, 128.43, 128.2, 128.1, 121.16, 116.50, 116.11, and 104.40. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C17H13N4O 289.1084, found 289.1088.

2-(5-(1H-indazol-3-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6c)

Yellow solid, Yield: 95 mg (69%) m.p 281–283 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 14.05 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (dd, J = 8.2, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (dd, J = 7.9, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (s, 2H), 6.75 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.03, 158.68, 148.42, 141.46, 133.08, 130.12, 128.06, 127.81, 123.35, 121.28, 121.09, 116.48, 116.20, 111.64, and 104.36. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H12N5O 278.1036, found 278.1038.

4-Fluoro-2-(5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 99 mg (77%), m.p 226–227.5 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.86 (dd, J = 4.4, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (dd, J = 4.4, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (ddd, J = 8.9, 8.4, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (s, 2H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.8, 161.2, 154.5, 152.6, 151.3, 145.5, 130.7, 121.2 (d, J = 23.7 Hz), 120.8, 118.07 (d, J = 7.5 Hz), 113.3 (d, J = 22.5 Hz), and 103.6 (d, J = 8.3 Hz). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C13H10FN4O 257.0833, found 257.0837.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6e)

Yellow solid, Yield: 115 mg (84%), m.p 208–209 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.86 (dd, J = 7.1, 2.7 Hz, 2H), 8.19–8.07 (m, 2H), 7.94 (dd, J = 4.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 7.2, 4.0, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.02–6.89 (m, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.53, 161.34, 151.34, 147.41, 133.11, 130.77, 127.28, 120.88, 119.29, 118.35, and 105.05. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C13H10ClN4O 273.0538, found 273.0537.

4-Chloro-2-(5-(isoquinolin-3-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline (6f)

Yellow solid, Yield: 119 mg (74%), m.p 213–214 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.52 (s, 1H), 8.88 (s, 1H), 8.27 (s, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 37.9 Hz, 3H), 7.34 (s, 1H), 6.99 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.0, 162.77, 153.9, 147.3, 136.7, 135.6, 132.8, 132.2, 130.0, 129.4, 128.4, 128.1, 126.9, 121.4, 119.2, 118.3, and 105.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C17H12ClN4O 323.0694, found 323.0688.

2-(5-(Isoquinolin-3-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)-4-methoxyaniline (6g)

Yellow solid, Yield: 118 mg (74%), m.p 190–191 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.54 (s, 1H), 8.86 (s, 1H), 8.27 (dd, J = 17.0, 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.1, 162.5, 153.8, 150.3, 143.2, 136.9, 135.6, 132.2, 130.1, 129.3, 128.4, 128.1, 122.0, 121.2, 118.2, 110.5, 104.1, and 56.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C18H15N4O2 319.1190, found 319.1191.

4-(5-(2-Aminophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8a)

Yellow solid, Yield: 118 mg (75%), m.p 282–283 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.38–8.31 (m, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (s, 2H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.93 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 2H), 6.76–6.70 (m, 1H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.2, 161.6, 148.5, 147.0, 133.2, 128.4, 127.7, 127.1, 116.4, 116.0, and 104.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H13N4O3S 317.0703, found 317.0710.

4-(5-(2-Amino-5-methylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8b)

Yellow solid, Yield: 117 mg (71%), m.p 278–279 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.38–8.31 (m, 2H), 8.09–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 2H), 7.14 (dt, J = 14.5, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 21.4 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (s, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.3, 161.6, 147.1, 146.4, 134.4, 127.7, 127.1, 126.6, 124.6, 116.7, 104.0, and 20.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H13N4O3S 331.0859, found 331.0866.

4-(5-(2-Amino-5-methoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8c)

Yellow solid, Yield: 130 mg (75%), m.p 253–254 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.38 (t, J = 10.3 Hz, 2H), 8.09–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 13.1, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.1, 161.7, 150.4, 147.1, 143.3, 127.8, 127.1, 126.6, 122.10, 118.1, 110.8, 103.9, and 56.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H15N4O4S 347.0809, found 347.0812.

4-(5-(2-Amino-5-fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8d)

Yellow solid, Yield: 117 mg (70%), m.p 290–291 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.42–8.36 (m, 2H), 8.08–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.79–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.59 (s, 2H), 7.21 (tdd, J = 11.9, 8.7, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (td, J = 9.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 2H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.49 (s), 161.92 (s), 154.55 (s), 152.71 (s), 147.22 (s), 145.39 (s), 127.94 (s), 127.08 (s), 126.50 (s), 121.08 (d, J = 23.2 Hz), 118.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz), 113.33 (d, J = 24.4 Hz), and 103.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H12FN4O3S 335.0609, found 335.0621.

4-(5-(2-Amino-5-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8e)

Yellow solid, Yield: 117 mg (67%), m.p 306–307 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.40 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.08–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.93 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (dd, J = 17.6, 11.7 Hz, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.2, 161.9, 147.2 (d, J = 11.0 Hz), 132.9, 127.9, 127.1 (d, J = 13.3 Hz), 126.4, 119.2, 118.3, and 105.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H12ClN4O3S 353.0313, found 353.0305.

4-(5-(2-Amino-5-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8f)

Yellow solid, Yield: 138 mg (65%), m.p 242–243 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.42–8.37 (m, 2H), 8.08–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.34 (dt, J = 11.2, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 7.04–7.00 (m, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.1, 162.0, 147.6, 147.4 (d, J = 51.9 Hz), 147.2, 138.1, 128.0, 127.0, 126.8,126.4, 121.8, 121.1, 119.8, 117.7, and 104.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H12F3N4O3S 401.0525, found 401.0536.

4-(5-(2-Amino-3-fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8g)

Yellow solid, Yield: 102 mg (61%), m.p 260–261 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.38–8.33 (m, 2H), 8.08–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.78 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.32 (ddd, J = 11.7, 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.79–6.72 (m, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.5 (d, J = 4.1 Hz), 161.9, 152.2, 150.3, 147.2, 137.1 (d, J = 15.6 Hz), 137.1(d, J = 15.6 Hz), 127.9, 127.1, 126.4, 124.0 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 118.0 (d, J = 17.9 Hz), 115.7 (d, J = 7.3 Hz), and 106.8 (d, J = 5.6 Hz). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H12FN4O3S 335.0609, found 335.0611.

4-(5-(2-Amino-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8h)

Yellow solid, Yield: 112 mg (65%), m.p 295–296 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.34 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 8.05 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (s, 3H), 7.07 (s, 1H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 2.22 (d, J = 35.1 Hz, 6H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.6, 161.6, 147.1, 144.6, 135.2, 127.7, 127.1, 126.6, 125.7, 124.6, 123.7, 104.0, 20.3, and 18.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C16H17N4O3S 345.1016, found 345.1012.

4-(5-(2-Amino-3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8i)

Yellow solid, Yield: 114 mg (60%), m.p 284–285 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.29–8.24 (m, 2H), 8.08–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.60 (s, 2H), 7.52 (t, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (s, 2H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.1, 161.2, 147.3, 146.5, 133.22 (d, J = 41.0 Hz), 127.9, 127.2, 126.7, 117.5 (d, J = 33.0 Hz), and 106.9. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H11Cl2N4O3S 384.9923, found 384.9927.

3-(5-(2-Aminophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8j)

Yellow solid, Yield: 99 mg (63%), m.p 257–258 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.56 (s, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.90–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.62 (s, 2H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 6.73 (dd, J = 11.1, 4.0 Hz, 1H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.1, 161.6, 148.4, 145.7, 133.2, 130.9, 130.1, 129.0, 128.3, 124.6, 124.0, 116.4, 116.0, and 104.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H13N4O3S 317.0703, found 317.0711.

3-(5-(2-Amino-5-methylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8k)

Yellow solid, Yield: 107 mg (65%), m.p 264–265 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 22.4 Hz, 3H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (s, 2H), 2.27 (s, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.2, 161.5, 146.4, 145.7, 134.4, 130.8, 130.2, 129.0, 127.6, 124.6 (d, J = 2.3 Hz),124.0, 116.7, 104.0, and 20.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H15N4O3S 331.0859, found 331.0855.

3-(5-(2-Amino-5-methoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8l)

Yellow solid, Yield: 119 mg (69%), m.p 240–242 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.57 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.42–8.37 (m, 1H), 8.09–8.04 (m, 1H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (s, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 165.0, 161.6, 150.36, 145.7, 143.2, 130.8, 130.3, 129.0, 124.5, 124.0, 121.9, 118.1, 110.9, 103.9, and 56.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H15N4O4S347.0809, found 347.0818.

3-(5-(2-Amino-5-fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8m)

Yellow solid, Yield: 100 mg (60%), m.p225–226 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.59 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (ddd, J = 11.1, 6.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.74–7.67 (m, 1H), 7.63 (s, 2H), 7.23 (td, J = 8.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (dd, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 2H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.38, 161.8, 154.5, 152.7, 145.7, 145.3, 130.8, 130.3, 129.1, 124.4, 124.1, 121.1, 121.0 (d, J = 23.1 Hz), 120.9, 118.0 (d, J = 7.4 Hz), 113.3, 113.2 (d, J = 24.3 Hz), 113.1, and 103.8 (d, J = 8.2 Hz). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H12FN4O3S335.0609, found 335.0617.

3-(5-(2-Amino-5-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8n)

Yellow solid, Yield: 120 mg (60%), m.p 253–255 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.56 (s, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (s, 2H), 7.32 (dd, J = 10.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.80–6.72 (m, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.4, 161.9, 152.2, 150.3, 145.8, 137.1 (d, J = 15.6 Hz), 130.9, 130.3, 129.2, 124.4, 124.1, 123.9 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 118.0 (d, J = 17.9 Hz), 115.7 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), and 106.8 (d, J = 5.4 Hz). HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C15H12F3N4O4S401.0526, found 401.0533.

3-(5-(2-Amino-3-fluorophenyl)-1,3,4-ovxadiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (8o)

Yellow solid, Yield: 101 mg (61%), m.p 231–233 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 8.58 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 8.45–8.40 (m, 1H), 8.10–8.06 (m, 1H), 7.85 (dd, J = 9.0, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (s, 2H), 7.35 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05–7.00 (m, 3H).13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.0, 161.9, 147.6, 145.7, 138.0 (d, J = 1.9 Hz), 130.8, 130.5, 129.2, 126.7, 124.4, 124.2 (d, J = 33.0 Hz), 124.1, 120.9, 117.7, and 104.09. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C14H12FN4O3S335.0609, found 335.0615.

Carbonic anhydrase inhibition assay

An SX.18 MV-R Applied Photophysics (Oxford, UK) stopped-flow instrument has been used to assay the catalytic/inhibition of various CA isozymes. Phenol Red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) has been used as indicator, working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) as buffer, 0.1 M Na2SO4 or NaClO4 (for maintaining constant the ionic strength; these anions are not inhibitory in the used concentration), following the CA-catalysed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 5–10 s. Saturated CO2 solutions in water at 25 °C were used as substrate. Stock solutions of inhibitors were prepared at a concentration of 10 µM (in DMSO-water 1:1, v/v) and dilutions up to 0.01 nM done with the assay buffer mentioned above. At least seven different inhibitor concentrations have been used for measuring the inhibition constant. Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 10 min at room temperature prior to assay, in order to allow for the formation of the E-I complex. Triplicate experiments were done for each inhibitor concentration, and the values reported throughout the paper are the mean of such results. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using the Cheng–Prusoff equation, as reported earlier, and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. All CA isozymes used here were recombinant proteins obtained as reported earlier by our group,.

Results and discussion

We commenced our investigation with a reaction using an equimolar ratio of isatin and 4-methyl benzohydrazide as model substrates using molecular iodine (100 mol%) and Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv.) in DMSO at 100 °C (Table 1). The desired product was obtained in 71% yield (Table 1, entry 1). No product was obtained in the absence of either catalyst or base which suggests that an iodine/base combination is required for the reaction to occur (Table 1, entries 2–4). Exploring the possibility for improving the reaction efficiency, the effect of other alkali metal carbonates/other bases on the reaction efficiency was then examined. The transformation underwent smoothly in the presence of K2CO3 to afford the desired product 3a in 80% yield after 12 h (Table 1, entry 5),whereas other bases, such as Na2CO3, K3PO4, and NaHCO3 were found to be less effective (Table 1, entries 6–8). With an attempt to further optimise the yield of the product, we investigated the influence of various iodine reagents. TBAI, N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and KI gave poor to moderate yields, i.e. of 18, 45, and 35%, respectively (Table 1, entries 9–11). However, phenyliodine(III) diacetate (PIDA), and hydroxy(tosyloxy)iodobenzene (HITB) did not at all lead to the formation of the desired product 3a (Table 1, entries 12–13). Furthermore, a series of experiments were also carried out in various other solvents, such as, DMF, MeCN, THF, 1,4-dioxane, EtOH, MeOH, and H2O. From the obtained results, it can be seen that the use of DMSO and DMF at 120 °C gave an almost identical result, albeit with a lower yield in the latter case (Table 1, entries 14–15), whereas, MeCN, THF, 1,4-dioxane, EtOH, MeOH, and H2O at reflux temperatures proved to be less effective (Table 1, entries 16–21). Furthermore, the iodine loading was also investigated in this reaction, and the yields were dropped to 59 and 52 at 0.75 and 0.5 equiv., respectively (Table 1, entries 22–23) of I2, and to a significantly lower value of 33% at 0.2 mol equiv. of I2 (Table 1, entry 24). We also conducted a control experiment under nitrogen atmosphere, but the yield under these conditions was diminished to 25%. This indicated that atmospheric O2 played an important role in the above transformation. Surprisingly, when the same reaction was performed under microwave irradiation gave better yield of 3a (91%) within a short span of time (40 min). Indeed, the use of microwave technology has never been mentioned in the literature for the synthesis of 2–(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline derivatives up until now. Thus the foregoing experiments led to the conclusion that the conditions used under entry 25 of Table 1 are the optimal ones for the reaction and, therefore, the microwave conditions were employed subsequently for all further reactions to generate compounds 3a–3u/6a–6g/8a–o.
Table 1.

Optimisation of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of compound 3a.

EntryIodine (mol%)BaseSolventYield (3a)b (%)
1I2 (100)Cs2CO3DMSO71
2I2DMSOn.rd
3Cs2CO3DMSOn.rd
4DMSOn.rd
5I2 (100)K2CO3DMSO80
6I2 (100)K3PO4DMSO52
7I2 (100)Na2CO3DMSO59
8I2 (100)NaHCO3DMSO56
9TBAI (100)K2CO3DMSO18
10NIS (100)K2CO3DMSO42
11KI (100)K2CO3DMSO35
12PIDA (100)K2CO3DMSOn.rd
13HTIB (100)K2CO3DMSOn.rd
14cI2 (100)K2CO3DMSO86
15cI2 (100)K2CO3DMF80
16I2 (100)K2CO3MeCN31
17I2 (100)K2CO3THF15
18I2 (100)K2CO31,4-dioxane45
19I2 (100)K2CO3EtOH39
20I2 (100)K2CO3MeOH27
21I2 (100)K2CO3H2On.rd
22I2 (20)K2CO3DMSO33
23I2 (50)K2CO3DMSO52
24I2 (75)K2CO3DMSO59
25I2 (100)K2CO3DMSO91e

aStandard reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), 2a (1.0 equiv.), reagents (equiv.) were heated in 3 ml solvent in a sealed tube for 12 h; bIsolated yields; cReaction was carried out at 120 °C; dn.r.: no reaction; eReaction was carried out under microwave irradiation at 160 °C.

Optimisation of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of compound 3a. aStandard reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv.), 2a (1.0 equiv.), reagents (equiv.) were heated in 3 ml solvent in a sealed tube for 12 h; bIsolated yields; cReaction was carried out at 120 °C; dn.r.: no reaction; eReaction was carried out under microwave irradiation at 160 °C. With the optimised conditions in hand, we started our exploration towards finding the potential applicability of this intramolecular decarboxylating domino reaction by attempting to prepare a variety of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles, using a varied set number of substituted isatins and benzohydrazides. The results are summarised in Scheme 2. In this way, a diversified set of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles 3a–3u were obtained in moderate to excellent yields. It was found that the reactions were equally successful with both electron withdrawing (4-CF3, 4-F, 4-Br, and 3,5-dichloro) as well as electron donating substituents [4-Me, 2-Me-4-OMe, and 3,4,5-(OMe)3] on the hydrazide component. However, it may be emphasised that in contrast to other electron-withdrawing substituents, the 4-nitro group-bearing substrates required longer time to complete the reaction satisfactorily (3h).
Scheme 2.

One pot synthesis of the 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazo-2-yl)aniline derivatives. (a) Reaction conditions: 1 (1 equiv.), 2 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 30–40 min, (b) isolated yields, and (c) The reaction was performed on gram scale.

One pot synthesis of the 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazo-2-yl)aniline derivatives. (a) Reaction conditions: 1 (1 equiv.), 2 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 30–40 min, (b) isolated yields, and (c) The reaction was performed on gram scale. We also studied the effect of electron-donating (–OMe) and electron-withdrawing groups (5-Cl, 5-Br, 5-F, 5-OCF3, and 5-NO2) on the isatin component on the reaction efficiency, in terms of both the yield and the reaction time. Notably, these reactions also underwent smoothly to render the corresponding 1,3,4-oxadiazoles in good to excellent yields of 80–92% (3j–3u). Considering the significance of the heterocyclic scaffolds in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry, we further investigated as substrate of this protocol a variety of heteroaryl hydrazides, such as isonicotinoylhydrazide, isoquinoline-3-carbohydrazide, and indazole-3-carbohydrazide (Scheme 3). Under the optimal conditions mentioned above, these heteroaryl derivatives smoothly reacted with isatin and provided the corresponding 1,3,4-oxadiazoles in moderate to good yields, i.e. 69–90% (6a–c), whereas, the reactions with 5-chloro, 5-fluoro, and 5-methoxy-isatin required longer reaction times (40 min) to furnish the desired product in satisfying yields (6d–g, 74–84%). The structure of 3g was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis, as depicted in Figure 2.
Scheme 3.

One-pot synthesis of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazo-2-yl)aniline derivatives from various isatins and heteroaryl hydrazides. Reaction conditions: 4 (1.0 equiv.), 5 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 30–40 min, isolated yields.

Figure 2.

ORTEP diagram of the single crystal structure of compound 3g as determined by X-ray crystallography.

One-pot synthesis of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazo-2-yl)aniline derivatives from various isatins and heteroaryl hydrazides. Reaction conditions: 4 (1.0 equiv.), 5 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 30–40 min, isolated yields. ORTEP diagram of the single crystal structure of compound 3g as determined by X-ray crystallography. In addition to various substituted aryl and heteroaryl hydrazides, we applied this protocol on hydrazides incorporating a sulfonamide moiety. Under the optimised conditions mentioned earlier, 3 or 4-sulfamoyl benzhydrazides 7a,b reacted smoothly with a variety of substituted isatins to afford different 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulfonamides 8a–o (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.

One pot synthesis of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulfonamide derivatives. Reaction conditions: 1 (1.0 equiv.), 7 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 40 min, isolated yields.

One pot synthesis of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulfonamide derivatives. Reaction conditions: 1 (1.0 equiv.), 7 (1.05 equiv.), I2 (1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.5 equiv.) in DMSO (3 ml) under µW irradiation at 160 °C for 40 min, isolated yields. In order to obtain some mechanistic insights into the nature of the reaction, radical trapping experiments were performed by employing TEMPO (0.5 equiv.) under the set of optimised conditions mentioned above. Indeed, no desired product was obtained when the reaction was performed in the presence of TEMPO, suggesting clearly that the reaction took place through a radical pathway (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5.

Control experiment using TEMPO.

Control experiment using TEMPO. In the light of the obtained results and the work reported in the literature,, a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed, which is shown in Figure 3, using 1a and 2a as the starting materials for the iodine-mediated domino reaction. Isatin (1a) condenses with the hydrazide (2a) to give the intermediate hydrazone A, which subsequently undergoes a hydrolytic ring cleavage to form the carboxylate B. Iodine in the presence of oxygen, oxidises B to form the radical intermediate C. Subsequently, abstraction of a proton by the base, followed by a cyclisation gave the intermediate E, which by elimination of one molecule of CO2 and HI, led to the formation of the final product 3a.
Figure 3.

Possible reaction mechanism for the domino reaction investigated here.

Possible reaction mechanism for the domino reaction investigated here. 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles are well known for exhibiting a specific fluorescence. In this regard, we investigated the excitation and emission spectra of some representative molecules described here in diluted DMSO as solvent. The excitation and emission spectra of compounds 3e and 3o showed prominent shifts to longer wavelengths, in contrast to the other cases in which the shifts were typically only marginal. Figure 4 shows the fluorescence emission spectra of compounds 3g, 3q, and 3s. Fluorescence properties of these compounds suggest that they may hold a potential for applications as chemical probes.
Figure 4.

Fluorescence emission spectra of compounds 3g, 3q, and 3s in DMSO.

Fluorescence emission spectra of compounds 3g, 3q, and 3s in DMSO.

Carbonic anhydrase inhibition

Carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) are a superfamily of metalloenzymes, present in most living organisms, in which they catalyses a simple physiological reaction, i.e. the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate and protons via a ping–pong mechanism. These enzymes are involved in many physiological and pathological processes, such as pH and CO2 homeostasis, respiration and transport of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate between metabolising tissues and lungs, electrolyte secretion in various tissues and organs, biosynthetic reactions (gluconeogenesis, lipogenesis, and ureagenesis); calcification, bone resorption, and tumourigenicity (in mammals),. Dysregulated activities of these carbonic anhydrases were proven to be connected with different human diseases, and inhibition of these enzymes by small molecules represents an efficient strategy in chemotherapeutic intervention. Sulphonamides and their bioisosteres (sulfamates and sulfamides), represents the main class of pharmacologically relevant CA inhibitors. Hence, it was of interest to evaluate the CA inhibitory activity of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulfonamides (8a–o) reported here. Thus, compounds 8a–o were investigated as inhibitors of four catalytically active human (h) CA isoforms, i. e. widespread, cytosolic, hCA I, and hCA II, the membrane-anchored hCA IV, as well as the transmembrane hCA IX, using the clinically used compound acetazolamide as a standard inhibitor. The inhibition data are shown in Table 2. The following structure-activity relationship (SAR) can be delineated from the data of Table 2:
Table 2.

Inhibition of hCA isoforms I, II, IV, and IX with sulphonamides 8a–o by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.

KI (nM)*
CompoundhCA IhCA IIhCA IVhCA IX
8a222.234.17339.51892.5
8b270.151.55608.91599.6
8c320.716.45924.3282.1
8d735.543.76326.71604.2
8e3497.2221.58239.12366.0
8f709.693.22173.52453.5
8g81.46.42022.72267.5
8h89.117.67592.02030.7
8i812.646.46777.92738.5
8j3311.946.9526.02915.5
8k5828.364.6437.32964.0
8l3514.0515.7588.22715.2
8m746.6307.0548.32566.0
8n344.1480.49428.0254.7
8o731.086.3521.5140.3
AAZ25012.17425.8

Mean from three different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).

Inhibition of hCA isoforms I, II, IV, and IX with sulphonamides 8a–o by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay. Mean from three different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values). The slow cytosolic isoform hCA I was inhibited by all the examined sulphonamide derivatives 8a–o with inhibition constants (KIs) spanning between 81.4 and 5828.3 nM. Sulphonamides incorporating fluoro (8g) and dimethylaniline moieties (8h) showed medium nanomolar activity (KI of 81.4 and 89.1 nM, respectively). The other analogues were less potent and exhibited high nanomolar to low micromolar inhibitory potency against this isoform (KIs ranging between 222.2 and 5828.3, respectively),. hCA II, the dominant physiological isozyme, which is an anti-glaucoma drug target, was inhibited by all the tested compounds, with efficacy spanning from the low to the high nanomolar range (KIs of 6.4–515.7 nM, Table 2). Among these, compound 8g displayed the highest inhibitory activity with a KI of 6.4 nM. Compounds 8a–d, 8f, 8h–k, and 8o also showed nanomolar inhibitory activity against this isoform, with KIs in the range of 16.4–86.3 nM, whereas remaining analogues exhibited high nanomolar inhibitory action. Among all these compounds, the 4-sulfamoyl derivatives showed a better CA II inhibitory activity compared to the 3-sulfamoyl derivatives. For example compounds, 8c and 8g were 31 and 13 times more potent than 8l and 8o, respectively. On the other hand, substitution on the aniline fragment also had a significant role on activity, i.e. o-fluoro substituted aniline bearing analogues 8g and 8o were more active in comparison to the p-substituted analogues 8d and 8m. From these observations, it can be clearly demonstrated that the substitution pattern on both phenyl rings had significant effect on the inhibitory activity against hCA II. hCA IV, which is a membrane-associated isoform majorly expressed in the eye, lungs, and kidneys, being involved among others in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa diseases, was not particularly prone to inhibition by the sulphonamides investigated here In fact, all screened molecules (8a–o) displayed micromolar inhibitory activity, except 8j–m and 8o, which showed high nanomolar CA inhibitory activity, with KIs of 437.3–548.3 nM (Table 2). hCA IX, the tumour-associated isoform, was moderately inhibited by all tested compounds with KIs in the range of 140.3–2964.0 nM. Substitution on both phenyl rings did not significantly influence the inhibition profile of these compounds for this isoform. Of the screened compounds, 8c, 8n, and 8o exhibited better CA IX inhibitory profile against this isozyme, with KIs of 140.3–282.1 nM (Table 2).

Conclusions

We have developed a more efficient and environmentally friendly protocol for the construction of 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline derivatives through one-pot domino decarboxylation by employing molecular iodine under microwave irradiation. This strategy works well with various substituted isatins and hydrazides belonging to both aryl and heteroaryl series, also showing good functional group tolerance. Furthermore, this protocol provided various oxadiazoles, which can be used for further functionalisation protocols. The reaction mechanism of this domino reaction was also delineated and presented in this article. Many of the synthesised molecules exhibited fluorescence properties that indicate their potential usefulness in the field of material chemistry. The synthesised 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazolo-2-yl)aniline-benzene sulfonamides (8a–o) were tested for their CA inhibitory activity and it was noticed that compounds 8c, 8g, and 8h displayed promising and selective activity against isoform hCA II with KIs of 16.4, 6.4, and 17.6 nM, respectively. Such compounds may be useful for various applications in which the CA activity must be inhibited, such as for the design of anti-glaucoma, antiobesity, or antitumor agents,.
  6 in total

1.  Cu(II) catalyzed imine C-H functionalization leading to synthesis of 2,5-substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles.

Authors:  Srimanta Guin; Tuhin Ghosh; Saroj Kumar Rout; Arghya Banerjee; Bhisma K Patel
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  Intramolecular decarboxylative coupling as the key step in copper-catalyzed domino reaction: facile access to 2-(1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)aniline derivatives.

Authors:  Cheng Xu; Feng-Cheng Jia; Qun Cai; Deng-Kui Li; Zhi-Wen Zhou; An-Xin Wu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  The carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase. I. Stop-flow kinetic studies on the native human isoenzymes B and C.

Authors:  R G Khalifah
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1971-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Iodine-catalyzed radical oxidative annulation for the construction of dihydrofurans and indolizines.

Authors:  Shan Tang; Kun Liu; Yue Long; Xinlong Gao; Meng Gao; Aiwen Lei
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  TBAI-catalyzed oxidative coupling of aminopyridines with β-keto esters and 1,3-diones-synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines.

Authors:  Lijuan Ma; Xianpei Wang; Wei Yu; Bing Han
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Copper-mediated direct arylation of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles and 1,2,4-triazoles with aryl iodides.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kawano; Tomoki Yoshizumi; Koji Hirano; Tetsuya Satoh; Masahiro Miura
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 6.005

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.