| Literature DB >> 29535748 |
Ming Zhao1,2, Hongxiang Zhang1, Hong Yan2, Lu Qiu2, Carol C Baskin3,4.
Abstract
Since seed reserves can influence seed germination, the quantitative and qualitative differences in seed reserves may relate to the germination characteristics of species. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between germination and seed reserves, as well as their mobilization during germination of six grassland species (Chloris virgata, Kochia scoparia, Lespedeza hedysaroides, Astragalus adsurgens, Leonurus artemisia, and Dracocephalum moldavica) and compare the results with domesticated species. We measured starch, protein, and fat content in dry seeds and the initial absorption of water during imbibition. Starch, soluble protein, fat, and soluble sugar content also were determined at five stages during germination. Starch, protein, and fat reserves in dry seeds were not significantly correlated with germination percentage and rate (speed), but soluble sugar and soluble protein contents at different germination stages were positively significantly correlated with germination rate for the six species. Starch was mainly used during seed imbibition, and soluble protein was used from the imbibition stage to the highest germination stage. Fat content for all species remained relatively constant throughout germination for six species, regardless of the proportion of other seed reserves in the seeds. Our results for fat utilization differ from those obtained for cultivated grasses and legumes. These results provide new insight on the role of seed reserves as energy resources in germination for wild species.Entities:
Keywords: fat; germination; protein; seed reserve mobilization; soluble sugar; starch; wild species
Year: 2018 PMID: 29535748 PMCID: PMC5835038 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Family, life cycle, photosynthetic pathway (P), main seed reserve proportion in dry seeds and 1000 seed mass of the six species in this study.
| Species | Family | Life cycle | P | Starch (%) | Protein (%) | Fat (%) | Seed mass (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poaceae | Annual | C4 | 62.2 | 19.9 | 6.2 | 0.5461 | |
| Amaranthaceae | Annual | C4 | 47.3 | 24.2 | 11.2 | 0.4544 | |
| Fabaceae | Perennial | C3 | 48.2 | 23.3 | 8.6 | 2.0691 | |
| Fabaceae | Perennial | C3 | 47.8 | 23.8 | 9.4 | 1.4723 | |
| Lamiaceae | Annual | C3 | 35.2 | 20.2 | 35.8 | 1.2388 | |
| Lamiaceae | Annual | C3 | 25.6 | 17.0 | 20.0 | 1.8680 | |
Correlation coefficients between germination and seed reserve contents.
| Source of variation | Starch§ | Protein§ | Fat§ | Seed size | Soluble sugar† | Soluble protein† |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GP | - 0.23 | -0.09 | 0.02 | -0.01 | -0.02 | 0.30 |
| GR | 0.20 | 0.45 | -0.27 | -0.71** | 0.48* | 0.77** |
| Soluble sugar | 0.64 ** | 0.22 | -0.62** | |||
| Soluble protein | 0.16 | 0.67** | -0.40 | |||