| Literature DB >> 29535346 |
Ralph J M Temmink1, Sarah F Harpenslager2,3, Alfons J P Smolders2,4, Gijs van Dijk2,4, Roy C J H Peters2, Leon P M Lamers2,4, Monique M L van Kempen2.
Abstract
Azolla spn>p., aEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29535346 PMCID: PMC5849758 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22760-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Relative growth rates (RGRs, g g−1 DW d−1) ± SE of A. filiculoides after 21 days of growth at 0.5, 2, 10, 50 and 100 µmol P l−1 (n = 5). Significant differences are indicated by different letters (Tukey HSD post hoc test). Additional results of the statistical analysis are presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 2P content (µmol P g−1 DW; (a) N content (µmol N g−1 DW; (b) and N: P ratios (mol mol−1; (c) ±SE of A. filiculoides during 21 days of growth at 0.5, 2, 10, 50 and 100 µmol P l−1 (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant differences (Bonferroni post hoc test). Additional results of the statistical analyses are presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 3P (panel a) and N (panel b) sequestration rates (µmol m−2 d−1; n = 5) ± SE by A. filiculoides for the 0.5, 2, 10, 50 and 100 µmol P l−1 treatments. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA Tukey post hoc test). Additional results of the statistical analyses are presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 4Chlorophyll a + b (mg g−1 DW, (a) and plant N content (µmol N g−1 DW, (b) of A. filiculoides treated with 100 µmol P l−1 (Control), after Fe (Iron) or nitrogen addition (limitation experiment, n = 4) ± SE. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (ANOVA Tukey HSD pairwise comparison). Additional statistical results are presented in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 5P (µmol P m−2 d−1; left y-axis) and carbon (C; mmol C m−2 d−1; right y-axis) sequestration rates in A. filiculoides under different P loadings (n = 15; ± SE).