Literature DB >> 29535299

Benefit-risk profile of cytoreductive drugs along with antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy after transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Valerio De Stefano1, Alessandra Carobbio2, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro3, Paola Guglielmelli4, Alessandra Iurlo5, Maria Chiara Finazzi6, Elisa Rumi7,8, Francisco Cervantes9, Elena Maria Elli10, Maria Luigia Randi11, Martin Griesshammer12, Francesca Palandri13, Massimiliano Bonifacio14, Juan-Carlos Hernandez-Boluda15, Rossella Cacciola16, Palova Miroslava17, Giuseppe Carli18, Eloise Beggiato19, Martin H Ellis20, Caterina Musolino21, Gianluca Gaidano22, Davide Rapezzi23, Alessia Tieghi24, Francesca Lunghi25, Giuseppe Gaetano Loscocco4, Daniele Cattaneo5, Agostino Cortelezzi5, Silvia Betti1, Elena Rossi1, Guido Finazzi6, Bruno Censori26, Mario Cazzola7,8, Marta Bellini7, Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo9, Irene Bertozzi11, Parvis Sadjadian12, Nicola Vianelli13, Luigi Scaffidi14, Montse Gomez15, Emma Cacciola27, Alessandro M Vannucchi4, Tiziano Barbui28.   

Abstract

We analyzed 597 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) who presented transient ischemic attacks (TIA, n = 270) or ischemic stroke (IS, n = 327). Treatment included aspirin, oral anticoagulants, and cytoreductive drugs. The composite incidence of recurrent TIA and IS, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and cardiovascular (CV) death was 4.21 and 19.2%, respectively at one and five years after the index event, an estimate unexpectedly lower than reported in the general population. Patients tended to replicate the first clinical manifestation (hazard ratio, HR: 2.41 and 4.41 for recurrent TIA and IS, respectively); additional factors for recurrent TIA were previous TIA (HR: 3.40) and microvascular disturbances (HR: 2.30); for recurrent IS arterial hypertension (HR: 4.24) and IS occurrence after MPN diagnosis (HR: 4.47). CV mortality was predicted by age over 60 years (HR: 3.98), an index IS (HR: 3.61), and the occurrence of index events after MPN diagnosis (HR: 2.62). Cytoreductive therapy was a strong protective factor (HR: 0.24). The rate of major bleeding was similar to the general population (0.90 per 100 patient-years). In conclusion, the long-term clinical outcome after TIA and IS in MPN appears even more favorable than in the general population, suggesting an advantageous benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic and cytoreductive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29535299      PMCID: PMC5849668          DOI: 10.1038/s41408-018-0048-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


Introduction

Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by clonal expansion of an abnormal haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell[1] that harbours somatic gene mutations: JAK2 mutations define PV, while mutations of calreticulin (CALR) and thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) are specific to the majority of JAK2 un-mutated ET and PMF[2]. The natural history of these disorders is marked by venous and arterial thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and a propensity to transform into myelofibrosis (MF) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)[2]. Arterial thrombosis accounts for approximately two thirds of all major thrombotic events and represents a major cause of mortality. In particular, ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) are most prevalent in comparison with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and peripheral artery occlusions[3,4]. The incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events (ICVE) in MPN has been evaluated in a few studies. In a cohort of 1638 PV patients enrolled in the European Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Polycythemia Vera (ECLAP) study[5] and in a recent large observational study, including 1545 patients with JAK2-mutated PV[6], the incidence was 1.2 and 0.9 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Similar findings were reported in ET patients. In the PT-1[7] and in the ANA-HYDRET[8] trials, the incidence of ICVE was 1.2 and 1.7 per 100 patient-years, respectively. These rates are approximately 10-fold higher than in the general population, where the incidence is estimated at 0.17 per 100 patient-years[9]. Patients with MPN presenting with any type of venous and arterial thrombosis or with a previous history of cardiovascular (CV) events are labelled at high-risk for recurrences, and cytoreduction in addition to antithrombotic drugs is recommended to reduce the rate of recurrence[10-12], although both the modalities of treatment and the effectiveness on prevention of recurrences have been scarcely explored. In a single retrospective study, recurrence after TIA/stroke in MPN was estimated at 1.18 per 100 patient-years[13]. This figure is even lower than in the general population in which the long-term incidence of recurrent IS varies from 2.0 to 3.0 per 100 patient-years[14-17]. Moreover, there is no controlled study assessing whether the incidence of major bleeding in MPN patients, eventually attributable to the use of antithrombotic drugs, is higher than in the general population owing the intrinsic bleeding characteristics of MPNs[3]. Therefore, considering the scarcity of data on the benefit/risk ratio of prophylaxis of recurrence with antithrombotic and cytoreductive drugs after those life-threatening complications, we launched an international investigator-driven retrospective cohort study called the Preventing Ischaemic Stroke in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (PRISM) study with three purposes: to describe the clinical profile at presentation of TIA/IS in contemporary PV, ET, and PMF patients; to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes beyond the acute phase, also in comparison with the general, non-MPN population; and to refine the risk assessment for recurrences and CV mortality.

Patients and methods

Study patients

A retrospective cohort study was conducted across 22 sites of 5 countries in the European Union and Israel within the European Leukaemia Network (ELN) in patients with a diagnosis of MPN according to the WHO 2008 criteria, after approval of the ethic committees (ECs) (primary approval by the central EC of the coordinating centre was obtained on 12 May 2016). The participants were asked to identify, among all patients with MPN, those who had suffered from TIA and IS in the period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. The index event had to be concurrent with, or in the 2 years before, MPN diagnosis, or occurring during the course of a previously diagnosed MPN disease. Stroke was defined as an episode of acute neurological dysfunction caused by focal cerebral ischaemia, based on objective imaging techniques (computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging scan) and clinical evidence of cerebral focal ischemic injury based on symptoms of any duration. TIA was defined as a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain ischemia, presenting with a unilateral motor or sensory deficit, speech deficit, haemianopsia or monocular blindness, lasting less than 24 h and without evidence of acute infarction on neuroimaging. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke (both intra-parenchymal and subarachnoid haemorrhage), cerebral venous thrombosis, and iatrogenic stroke (i.e., strokes related to neuro-endovascular procedures or coronary angiography) were excluded. Two neurologists (VDL and BC) independently reviewed the diagnostic criteria employed to record TIA and IS patients. Treatment in the acute phase was delivered by stroke specialists after consulting with haematologists who, after the acute event, took care of these patients during the follow-up. Each centre reported patients’ information by data input into an electronic database developed to record all study data after de-identification of the patients with an alphanumeric code to protect personal privacy. For each patient, the following information was recorded: demographic data, WHO diagnosis, type of ICVE, method of objective diagnosis, presence of microvascular disturbances or constitutional symptoms, mutation status, the results of the laboratory investigation for inherited or acquired thrombophilia (that is, deficiency of antitrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, increased levels of factor VIII, hyperhomocysteinemia, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies), full blood count at diagnosis and at thrombosis, presence of CV risk factors (that is, history of previous thrombosis before the index event, smoking habit, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, diabetes, congestive heart failure) and risk factors for cardiogenic embolism or vascular embolism (that is, atrial fibrillation, patent foramen ovale, valvular heart disease, significant carotid artery stenosis). Microvascular disturbances included erythromelalgia, scintillating scotoma, pulsatile headache, dizziness, and tinnitus. Diagnosis of microvascular disturbances, as well as of TIA, was accepted only in the presence of unequivocal medical documentation. Data regarding cytoreductive or antithrombotic treatment after index IS or TIA, duration of the treatment and reasons for discontinuation of the treatments were recorded. Finally, follow-up data concerning novel thrombotic events, bleeding complications, MPN haematologic evolution, and death were also recorded.

Outcomes after the index event

Recurrent IS was defined as a focal neurologic deficit of any duration with evidence at neuroimaging of brain ischemia located in an area not corresponding to the lesion(s) of the index stroke. Recurrent TIA was defined as a novel transient neurologic dysfunction (duration of less than 24 h) without evidence of infarction on brain imaging. Two neurologists (VDL and BC) independently reviewed and validated diagnoses of novel TIA and IS after the index event. Other arterial or venous thrombotic events that occurred after the index event were recorded only if objectively documented. Arterial recurrences besides ICVE included AMI, unstable angina pectoris and peripheral arterial thrombosis. Objectively established deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the legs and pulmonary embolism (PE), DVT of the arm, occlusion of cerebral or abdominal veins, thrombosis of the great saphenous vein of the leg objectively diagnosed with ultrasonography, and retinal vein thrombosis were also computed after the index TIA/IS. Major bleeding was defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis[18] and included fatal events or events occurring in a critical area such as an intracranial, intra-spinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular event. Bleeding was also defined as major when it occurred in non-critical areas (epistaxis, others) and was associated with a reduction of ≥2 g/dL in the haemoglobin concentration and/or necessitated transfusion of ≥2 blood units. MPN evolution into MF and/or AML was diagnosed according to the current guidelines[10-12].

Statistical methods

For continuous variables, the median and the 5th–95th percentiles or range are provided and non-parametric tests for the difference in medians between groups were performed. Categorical variables were summarized by counts and percentages, and groups were compared with a Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. The annual incidence rate of any event that occurred during the follow-up was calculated by dividing the number of events by the total number of patient-years. A composite CV outcome was defined including TIA, non-fatal IS, non-fatal AMI, and CV death, whichever occurred first. The cumulative probability of experiencing a specific outcome during follow-up was estimated by the competing risks method[19]. With this approach, a subject was assumed to experience the outcome only once, and the overall incidence at a given time was split into the sum of the cause-specific cumulative incidences. Finally, the Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between any potential risk factor and time of each outcome onset. Starting with all candidate variables (i.e., those listed in Table 1 as well as antithrombotic or cytoreductive treatment), backward selection was used to test whether the deletion or retention of each variable improved the model, repeating this process until no further improvement was possible. For all hypotheses tested, two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Table 1

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics

N Index stroke (N = 327)Index TIA (N = 270)p-value
Male/female—n (%)597141/186 (43/57)105/165 (39/61)0.296
Age at index event—median (5th–95th percentile)59769 (37–84)68.5 (40–83)0.970
MPN characteristics
 MPN diagnosis—n (%)5970.201
  Polycythemia vera107 (33)77 (29)
  Essential thrombocythemia174 (53)163 (60)
  Myelofibrosis46 (14)30 (11)
 Mutational status—n (%)5530.490
  JAK2 mutation/exon 12270 (89)211 (85)
  CALR mutation18 (6)21 (8)
  MPL mutation4 (1)6 (2)
  Triple negatives12 (4)11 (4)
Data at index event
 Imaging—n (%)578
  Computed tomography scan203 (64)177 (68)0.236
  Magnetic resonance imaging scan116 (36)82 (32)
 Blood cells values—median (5th–95th percentile)
  Hemoglobin (g/dL)43314.0 (10.4–17.9)14.2 (10–17.6)0.401
  Hematocrit (%)41843.0 (32.0–55.6)44.0 (34.0–54.0)0.238
  White blood cells count (×109/L)4409.1 (4.5–20.0)8.9 (5.0–17.1)0.387
  Platelets count (×109/L)459523 (204–1067)551 (255–1103)0.206
Index event heralding MPN diagnosisan (%)597149 (46)101 (37)0.044
Index event after MPN diagnosis—n (%)178 (54)169 (63)
 Years from MPN diagnosis to index event—median (5th–95th percentile)3474.37 (0.26–22.2)4.48 (0.35–16.3)0.958
Cardiovascular risk factors
 History of remoteb arterial and/or venous thrombosis—n (%)59776 (23)44 (16)0.035
  History of remoteb cerebrovascular thrombosis—n (%)59725 (8)16 (6)0.408
 Active smoking59782 (25)46 (17)0.017
 Hypertension597187 (57)140 (52)0.192
 Dyslipidemia59791 (28)55 (20)0.035
 Diabetes59738 (12)30 (11)0.845
 Atrial fibrillation59723 (7)10 (4)0.079
 Other cardiogenic embolismsc59742 (13)25 (9)0.167
 Microvascular disturbancesd59777 (24)83 (31)0.048
 Presence of thrombophilia—n (%)23854 (43)40 (36)0.307
  Inherited thrombophiliae16 (13)13 (12)0.835
  Hyperhomocysteinemia30 (24)18 (16)0.155
  Antiphospholipid antibodiesf13 (10)12 (11)0.885

aIndex events (ischemic stroke and TIA) occurred within a maximum of two years before the diagnosis of MPN or as heralding manifestation of MPN

bAnamnestic thrombosis occurred two years or more before the diagnosis of MPN

cOther embolisms or cardiogenic embolisms include patent foramen ovale, valvular heart disease (mitral stenosis, artificial valves), significant carotid artery stenosis, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease

dMicrovascular disturbances include erythromelalgia, scintillating scotoma, pulsatile headache, dizziness, and tinnitus

eInherited thrombophilia includes deficiency of antitrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, increased levels of factor VIII

fAntiphospholipid antibodies include lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics aIndex events (ischemic stroke and TIA) occurred within a maximum of two years before the diagnosis of MPN or as heralding manifestation of MPN bAnamnestic thrombosis occurred two years or more before the diagnosis of MPN cOther embolisms or cardiogenic embolisms include patent foramen ovale, valvular heart disease (mitral stenosis, artificial valves), significant carotid artery stenosis, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease dMicrovascular disturbances include erythromelalgia, scintillating scotoma, pulsatile headache, dizziness, and tinnitus eInherited thrombophilia includes deficiency of antitrombin, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, increased levels of factor VIII fAntiphospholipid antibodies include lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies

Results

Clinical and laboratory features of the cohort

The initial cohort suitable for the study consisted of 5102 MPN patients diagnosed from January 2005 through December 2015. Out of 615 patients recorded by centres, 18 were excluded: two with hemorrhagic stroke, and 16 with TIA or IS not considered as MPN-related because occurred before 2 years preceding the diagnosis of MPN, leaving a total of 597 MPN patients with documented TIA (n = 270) or IS (n = 327). The majority were over 60 years of age at the time of the index event; the frequency of the JAK2 V617F mutation was 100% in PV patients and 82% and 76% in ET and PMF patients, respectively. IS was documented more frequently than TIA at diagnosis, while TIA occurred in 63% of the cases during the course of MPN disease (Table 1). The distribution of PV, ET and PMF and baseline blood counts were similar in IS and TIA groups; patients with IS had more often a history of remote vascular events (more than 2 years before MPN diagnosis), active smoking, dyslipidaemia and atrial fibrillation, while TIA cases had a significantly higher history of microvascular disturbances (Table 1). Even though thrombophilia had a similar occurrence in the two groups, a trend for a greater frequency of inherited abnormalities was seen in patients less than 40 years (25%) than in the other age categories (13% and 9% for age 40–60 years and over 60 years, respectively; p = 0.094). Almost all patients received cytoreductive therapy (hydroxyurea in the large majority) and long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin particularly after TIA (p < 0.0001), while oral anticoagulants were more frequently prescribed after stroke (p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
Table 2

Medication use after the index stroke or TIA

Index stroke (N = 313a)Index TIA (N = 264a)p-value
Antithrombotic treatment
 None14 (4)10 (4)0.681
 Antiplatelet agent247 (79)239 (91)<0.0001
  Single agent (ASA or other)235 (75)230 (87)<0.0001
  Double agent (ASA + other)12 (4)9 (3)0.786
 Anticoagulant agent51 (16)14 (5)<0.0001
  VKA48 (15)13 (5)<0.0001
  DOAC3 (1)1 (<1)0.629
 Heparin1 (<1)1 (<1)0.904
Cytoreductive treatment
 None32 (10)25 (9)0.762
 Phlebotomy2 (<1)8 (3)0.049
 Hydroxyurea248 (79)204 (77)0.569
  Alone224 (72)193 (73)0.680
  In combination24 (8)11 (4)0.079
 Anagrelide3 (1)15 (6)0.001
 Interferon11 (4)6 (2)0.380
 Ruxolitinb5 (2)3 (1)0.733
 Otherb12 (4)3 (1)0.063

Overall, 503 patients (87.2%) received either cytoreductive and antithrombotic treatments; 50 patients (8.7%) received only antithrombotic treatment (and no cytoreductive treatment), 17 patients (2.9%) received only cytoreductive treatment (and no antithrombotic treatment), and 7 patients (1.2%) received neither cytoreductive nor antithrombotic treatments

ASA acetylsalicylic acid, VKA vitamin K-antagonist, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant

aTwenty out of 597 patients (3%) have missing information on treatments after the index event

bOther cytoreductive treatment includes pipobroman, busulphan, P32

Medication use after the index stroke or TIA Overall, 503 patients (87.2%) received either cytoreductive and antithrombotic treatments; 50 patients (8.7%) received only antithrombotic treatment (and no cytoreductive treatment), 17 patients (2.9%) received only cytoreductive treatment (and no antithrombotic treatment), and 7 patients (1.2%) received neither cytoreductive nor antithrombotic treatments ASA acetylsalicylic acid, VKA vitamin K-antagonist, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant aTwenty out of 597 patients (3%) have missing information on treatments after the index event bOther cytoreductive treatment includes pipobroman, busulphan, P32

Single and composite CV outcomes

During a total follow-up time of 2347 years after the index event (median 4.2, range 0–11.9), 113 patients (18.9%) experienced an incident thrombosis, 76% in arterial and 24% in venous sites (Table 3). The incidence rates of overall de-novo thrombosis and recurrent ICVE were 4.81 (95% CI 3.91–5.78) and 2.59 (95% CI 1.98–3.33).
Table 3

Overall incidence of major events after the index stroke or TIA

Index stroke (N = 327)Index TIA (N = 270)p-valuea
Events, n (%)Patient-yearsIncidence rate % pt-yrs (95% CI)Events, n (%)Patient-yearsIncidence rate % pt-yrs (95% CI)
Thrombotic events, n = 11354 (17)11794.41 (3.36–5.79)59 (22)11684.97 (3.84–6.42)0.5350
 Arterial thrombosis, n = 8638 (12)12283.10 (2.25–4.25)48 (18)11993.92 (2.94–5.22)0.2814
  Unstable angina pectoris1 (0.3)1 (0.4)
  Acute myocardial infarction4 (1.2)13080.31 (0.11–0.82)10 (3.7)13500.67 (0.35–1.28)0.1982
  TIA+13 (4.0)12901.01 (0.59–1.74)29 (10.7)12432.33 (1.62–3.36)0.0098
  Stroke+15 (4.6)12911.6 (0.70–1.93)4 (1.5)13780.29 (0.11–0.77)0.0079
  Peripheral artery thrombosis4 (1.2)4 (1.5)
  Splenic infarction1 (0.3)0 (0)
 +TIA + stroke, n = 6128 (9)12552.23 (1.54–3.23)33 (12)12402.66 (1.89–3.74)0.4959
 Venous thrombosis, n = 2716 (5)12781.10 (0.65–1.85)11 (4)13490.82 (0.45–1.47)0.4709
  DVT of the legs5 (1.5)7 (2.6)
  DVT of the legs + PE3 (0.9)2 (0.7)
  Pulmonary embolism2 (0.6)0 (0)
  Superficial vein thrombosis2 (0.6)1 (0.4)
  Hepatic vein thrombosis1 (0.3)0 (0)
  Splanchnic vein thrombosis2 (0.6)0 (0)
  Cerebral vein thrombosis1 (0.3)0 (0)
  Retinal vein thrombosis0 (0)1 (0.4)
Major bleeding, n = 2515 (5)12991.08 (0.64–1.82)10 (4)13550.74 (0.40–1.37)0.3681
 Intracranial bleeding6 (1.8)2 (0.7)
 Gastrointestinal bleeding3 (0.9)5 (1.9)
 Other sites6 (1.8)3 (1.1)
Evolution to MF, n = 199 (3)13080.69 (0.36–1.32)10 (4)13560.66 (0.35–1.28)0.9407
Evolution to AML, n = 176 (2)13260.45 (0.20–1.01)11 (4)13800.80 (0.44–1.44)0.2713
Second neoplasia, n = 5126 (8)12732.04 (1.39–3.00)25 (9)13411.79 (1.20–2.67)0.6435
 Breast5 (1.5)5 (1.9)
 Gastrointestinal/liver3 (0.9)5 (1.9)
 Kidney0 (0)2 (0.7)
 Lung1 (0.3)1 (0.4)
 Lymphoma/CLL3 (0.9)2 (0.7)
 Prostate/bladder5 (1.5)2 (0.4)
 Skin4 (1.2)4 (1.5)
 Other5 (1.5)4 (1.5)
Death, n = 10261 (19)13274.37 (3.38–5.66)41 (15)13812.97 (2.19–4.03)0.0572
 Cardiovascular26 (8.0)13271.73 (1.15–2.61)8 (3.0)13810.58 (0.29–1.16)0.0050
 Infection4 (1.2)4 (1.5)
 MF1 (0.3)1 (0.4)
 AML6 (1.8)8 (3.0)
 Second neoplasia4 (1.2)7 (2.6)
 Hemorrhage0 (0)1 (0.4)
 Unknown20 (18.7)12 (4.4)

aTests for differences in incidence rates

Overall incidence of major events after the index stroke or TIA aTests for differences in incidence rates The cumulative incidence of single and composite outcome is reported in Table 4. At one year, the cumulative incidence of the composite CV outcome was lower, though not significant, after TIA (4.21%) than after IS (7.14%) (p = 0.13), but the frequency resulted similar after 5 years (18.9 and 19.2%). The lower frequency of a composite outcome in the first year after TIA was due to the absence of incident cases of strokes and AMI, while recurrent TIA and AMI progressively increased at 5 years to 12% and 3.74% of patients, respectively. In contrast, after the index stroke, cerebral events including TIA and new IS occurred earlier and progressively increased. However, after 5 years, the two groups showed a similar cumulative incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular recurrences (13.2% and 12.3% after TIA and stroke, respectively), although the occurrence of the single outcome was different.
Table 4

Cumulative incidence of major events after the index stroke or TIA

TIA % (95% CI)Non-fatal stroke % (95% CI)Non-fatal AMI % (95% CI)CV mortality % (95% CI)Composite CV outcomea % (95% CI)Non-fatal venous thrombosis % (95% CI)Overall mortality % (95% CI)
Index TIA
 30-day0.37 (0.05–2.61)0.37 (0.05–2.60)0.74 (0.19–2.93)0.37 (0.05–2.60)
 90-day1.49 (0.56–3.92)0.37 (0.05–2.60)1.86 (0.78–4.40)0.37 (0.05–2.60)
 6-month1.87 (0.78–4.44)0.75 (0.19–2.96)2.61 (1.25–5.40)1.13 (0.37–3.46)
 12-month3.48 (1.82–6.58)0.75 (0.19–2.96)4.21 (2.35–7.47)0.79(0.20–3.12)1.92 (0.80–4.56)
 24-month6.57 (4.07–10.5)2.65 (1.20–5.80)1.65 (0.62–4.35)10.80 (7.47–15.5)1.24 (0.40–3.80)5.38 (3.15–9.09)
 60-month12.0 (8.26–17.2)1.24 (0.31–4.95)3.74 (1.88–7.40)2.14 (0.89–5.08)18.9 (14.2–24.9)3.68 (1.74–7.73)10.0 (6.69–14.9)
Index stroke
 30-day0.31 (0.04–2.20)0.32 (0.04–2.23)1.55 (0.65–3.68)2.17 (1.04–4.50)0.63 (0.16–2.51)1.55 (0.65–3.68)
 90-day0.96 (0.31–2.95)0.32 (0.04–2.23)2.18 (1.04–4.51)3.44 (1.92–6.12)1.61 (0.67–3.83)2.18 (1.04–4.51)
 6-month0.67 (0.17–2.65)0.96 (0.31–2.95)0.32 (0.04–2.23)2.50 (1.26–4.94)4.41 (2.64–7.34)1.94 (0.88–4.27)2.50 (1.26–4.94)
 12-month2.04 (0.92–4.49)2.03 (0.92–4.47)0.67 (0.17–2.64)2.50 (1.26–4.94)7.14 (4.75–10.6)1.94 (0.88–4.27)2.84 (1.49–5.40)
 24-month2.86 (1.44–5.66)3.61 (1.96–6.63)0.67 (0.17–2.64)3.64 (2.02–6.49)10.2 (7.23–14.3)2.76 (1.38–5.46)6.67 (4.29–10.3)
 60-month5.81 (3.32–10.1)6.52 (3.90–10.8)1.80 (0.65–4.91)7.18 (4.52–11.3)19.2 (14.6–25.0)4.60 (2.46–8.49)20.4 (15.4–26.6)

TIA transient ischemic attack, AMI acute myocardial infarction, CV cardiovascular

aComposite CV outcome includes non fatal TIA, Stroke, AMI, and CV deaths, whichever occurs first

Cumulative incidence of major events after the index stroke or TIA TIA transient ischemic attack, AMI acute myocardial infarction, CV cardiovascular aComposite CV outcome includes non fatal TIA, Stroke, AMI, and CV deaths, whichever occurs first In TIA patients, recurrent TIA contributed to 63% of the composite CV outcome; in contrast, the single outcomes after IS (CV mortality, IS, and TIA) contributed equally to the estimate of the composite outcome; in particular, after 5 years, CV deaths were more frequent than after TIA (7.18 and 2.14% respectively, p = 0.011). Figure 1 offers a graphic representation of the cumulative incidence of the specific outcomes contributing to the composite CV outcome after the two index events.
Fig. 1

Cumulative incidence of TIA, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal AMI, and cardiovascular (CV) death by type of index event (panel a: index TIA; panel b: index stroke).

The cumulative probability of experiencing a specific outcome was estimated by the competing risks method

Cumulative incidence of TIA, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal AMI, and cardiovascular (CV) death by type of index event (panel a: index TIA; panel b: index stroke).

The cumulative probability of experiencing a specific outcome was estimated by the competing risks method Venous thrombosis showed a higher cumulative incidence in the first year after stroke than after TIA (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02 at 3 and 6 months, respectively), but these rates were similar after 5 years (3.68% and 4.60%, respectively). The overall mortality after 1 year was comparable in the two groups (2.84% vs. 1.92%) and was due to CV complications in 88% after stroke and 39% after TIA. After 5 years, deaths for CV causes decreased to 35% after stroke and to 21% after TIA. Other causes of death were due to MF, acute leukaemia, solid tumour, infections, or haemorrhages (Table 3). The significant variables associated with arterial events, identified by backward selection for each specific outcome starting from the full model including all explanatory variables, are presented in Fig. 2. Independent prognostic factors of incident recurrent TIA were a previous index TIA, history of remote TIA and microvascular disturbances. Likewise, new incident ISs were predicted by an index stroke, particularly occurring after MPN diagnosis. In the IS group, arterial hypertension emerged as an independent risk factor. Of note, cytoreductive treatment was a strong protective factor capable of reducing the risk of new IS in 76% of patients. The only prognostic risk factor for AMI was a prior history of remote arterial and venous thrombosis, while CV death was predicted by a previous index IS, age over 60 years, and by the index event occurring after MPN diagnosis.
Fig. 2

Hazard ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association between significant risk factors and time of CV outcomes onset.

Estimates from multivariate Cox proportional hazard models with competitive risks method. Significant (p < 0.05) hazard ratio (HR) estimates kept by backward selection beginning from the full model on all explanatory variables are plotted

Hazard ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association between significant risk factors and time of CV outcomes onset.

Estimates from multivariate Cox proportional hazard models with competitive risks method. Significant (p < 0.05) hazard ratio (HR) estimates kept by backward selection beginning from the full model on all explanatory variables are plotted

Bleeding

Major bleeding occurred in 25 patients (4%), corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.9 per 100 patient-years (Table 5), with no difference between patients receiving antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulants. Of note, the eight cases experiencing cerebral bleeding were receiving single agent aspirin while no events in critical areas were seen in patients receiving oral anticoagulants. Among the risk factors, univariate analysis showed that age over 75 year was significantly associated with a risk of major haemorrhages (HR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.07–5.34, p = 0.035); however, in the multivariate model, corrected by the already mentioned risk factors, this effect was reduced to a trend (p = 0.074), while significant factors were the history of remote thrombosis (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.05–5.96, p = 0.038) and the thrombotic complications arising after MPN diagnosis (HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.08–8.29, p = 0.035).
Table 5

Incidence of major bleeding according to antithrombotic therapy

N (%)Total, N = 597 % pts/year (95% CI)Antiplatelet agents, n = 486 % pts/year (95% CI)Anticoagulant agents, n = 65 % pts/year (95% CI)p-valuea
Major bleeding25 (4)0.90 (0.61–1.35)0.94 (0.61–1.44)0.79 (0.20–3.16)0.980
 CNS bleeding8 (1.3)0.30 (0.15–0.59)0.35 (0.18–0.70)0 (0)0.426
 GI bleeding8 (1.3)0.26 (0.12–0.55)0.26 (0.12–0.59)0.40 (0.06–2.81)0.674
 Muscle hematoma5 (0.8)0.19 (0.08–0.45)0.18 (0.07–0.47)0.39 (0.05–2.77)0.497
 Epistaxis4 (0.6)0.15 (0.06–0.40)0.13 (0.04–0.41)0 (0)0.726

CNS cerebral nervous system, GI gastrointestinal

aTests for differences in incidence rate between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant agents groups

Incidence of major bleeding according to antithrombotic therapy CNS cerebral nervous system, GI gastrointestinal aTests for differences in incidence rate between antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant agents groups

Discussion

The large cohort of MPN patients included in the PRISM study represents, to the best of our knowledge, the most updated and comprehensive clinical epidemiological picture of how patients with cerebrovascular ischemia are managed in specialized haematological centres. In this large cohort, we obtained for the first time an accurate and comprehensive picture of the history of incident recurrences, CV events, and death over long-term follow-up after the occurrence of an index TIA and IS. At index TIA and IS presentation, patients had atrial fibrillation in a minority of cases (4 and 7%) compared with the general population (11–18% in TIA cases and 20–30% in IS cases, respectively)[20-23]; dyslipidemia and diabetes were also less frequent, accounting for approximately 50% of those found in non-MPN patients[20-23]. Therefore, the association of these comorbidities with TIA and IS events appears less evident in MPN than in non-MPN patients, suggesting that the condition of thrombophilia due to the underlying disease plays a major role via constitutive activation of the haemostatic system4. We underline the high frequency of JAK2V617F mutated patients in our cohort, confirming the significant influence of the JAK2V617F mutation in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in these clonal diseases[4]. Of interest, a great proportion of the patients presenting with an index TIA and IS had a prior history of microvascular disturbances underscoring their possible significance as predictors of major thrombosis in MPN[24]. To prevent recurrences and CV mortality, the patients in this study had received aspirin, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants as recommended for the general population[25], in addition to cytoreductive drugs according to the MPN treatment guidelines[10-12]. At one year after the TIA index event, 51 outcomes (8 deaths from CV causes, 4 IS, 10 AMI, and 29 TIA), corresponding to a composite cumulative incidence of 4.21%. This compares favourably with a contemporary cohort of patients with TIA or minor stroke recruited from the general population, in which the composite outcome at one year was 6.2%[22]. However, in contrast to the general population, the single outcomes after TIA presented with a different incidence. It is remarkable that among patients with TIA, no IS occurred in the first 2 years and that strokes occurred after 5 years in only 1.24% of cases. These estimates are lower than in contemporary non-MPN patients with TIA, in whom strokes occurred in 4.4–5.1% of patients after 1 year[14,15,22], and 12–13.2% after 5 years[14,15]. In contrast, while strokes were rare events, the cumulative incidence of new TIA episodes progressively increased year by year and reached a 12% incidence after 5 years, with a 10% overall mortality rate. On the other hand, after the index IS, new strokes occurred with a cumulative incidence lower than in the general population: after 1 and 5 years, it was 2.03 and 6.52% vs 11.1–12% and 26.4% of non-MPN patients, respectively[16,23]. As expected, in comparison with TIA, overall mortality after stroke was doubled (20.4%), due to CV causes in 35% of cases. As regards risk factors for recurrent events, TIA or IS patients tended to replicate the first manifestation (HR for recurrent TIA and recurrent IS 2.4 and 4.4, respectively); moreover recurrent TIA was significantly anticipated by microvascular symptoms (HR 2.3), whereas recurrent stroke was associated with hypertension (HR 4.2). The use of cytoreductive drugs was a strong protective factor and decreased the rate of recurrent IS by 76%. Notably, the occurrence of the index events in the course of follow-up after diagnosis of MPN, in spite of antithrombotic prophylaxis and cytoreductive drugs, was identified as a strong prognostic factor for IS and CV death. The different clinical course of recurrences after index TIA or IS could reflect a non-univocal pathogenesis of the two clinical phenotypes. We speculate that in TIA, there is a prominent role of haemostatic alterations characterized by an ongoing process of platelet activation, platelet aggregation and abnormal platelet-endothelial interactions, producing endothelial cell activation and transient damage in microvascular districts[26-29]. This haemostatic perturbance, when combined with hypertension, was found to be independently associated with recurrences in patients with IS, reflecting a condition leading to a higher frequency of more severe cerebral ischemic events. An important outcome that should be evaluated after TIA and stroke is myocardial infarction. The frequency at 5 years of AMI was 3.74% and 1.80% in TIA and stroke, respectively, which are estimates comparable to the general population[30]. Finally, the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher after stroke in the first year, while at 5 years it was comparable after TIA and stroke (3.68% and 4.60%, respectively). This latter estimate is strikingly lower than that reported in a population-based study in which the cumulative incidence of VTE after stroke was as high as 15% at 3 months after the event, with a subsequent slow increase up to approximately 40% at 5 years after a stroke[31]. All in all, the cumulative incidence of the composite outcome, including ICVE, AMI, and CV deaths, was the same (19%) at 5 years after both an index TIA and IS, even though the single outcomes were differently represented. The limitations of our study are those of a retrospective observational study. Case ascertainment, however, was based on objective imaging in almost the totality of cases (97%) and confirmation of the diagnosis by experienced stroke clinicians who took care of the patients in the acute phase. The collection of the data was made by expert haematologists and every effort was made to minimize missing data and incomplete follow-up; as a result, no data concerning traditional CV risk factors were missing, and no patient was lost to follow-up. The patients were selected from an MPN database of over 5000 patients diagnosed by expert centres in the last decade, so that our results can be generalized to the overall contemporary population of the MPN patients. At least three reasons may account for the inferior rate of CV complications after TIA or strokes in MPN compared to the general population: first, atrial fibrillation is recognized as a risk factor for recurrent ICVE[32], and this condition was low in our patient population; second, we speculate about a better control and adherence to the prescribed drugs (antithrombotic, anti-hypertensive, statins, and antidiabetics) due to the more frequent follow-up visits needed to monitor chemotherapy; and third, we underline the antithrombotic efficacy of hydroxyurea on MPN-associated risk factors[33,34]. The antithrombotic effect of hydroxyurea may recognize additional mechanisms of action besides myelosuppression, including qualitative changes in leukocyte function, decreased expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, and enhanced nitric oxide generation[35,36]. The favourable risk-benefit profile of therapy in the prevention of CV events was obtained without enhancing the risk of major bleeding, which had an incidence similar to the general population receiving long-term antiplatelet secondary prophylaxis[37]. Even though the recurrent events after TIA and stroke showed an inferior incidence compared to the non-MPN population, a residual risk of new TIA and strokes remained, and future studies should be designed to test new antithrombotic therapy and perhaps include new cytoreductive drugs. However, the long-term observation of this cohort suggests some considerations that may have practical clinical relevance: (a) MPN patients with a previous ICVE are prone to recurrence including also other major CV events; (b) the observed advantage for recurrence when compared to the general population, is likely due to a strict adherence to the recommended treatment options for long-term treatment of MPN patients with thrombosis[10-12], based on antithrombotic treatment, cytoreduction, and phlebotomies; (c) cytoreduction with hydroxyurea resulted particularly effective in patients with IS, who are at higher risk of CV death; (d) although the incidence of major bleeding was aligned with that expected in the general population under anticoagulants, a prudent use of aspirin may be suggested in patients with a previous long history of treatments for thrombosis and with age over 75 years, given the enhanced hemorrhagic risk[37]. In conclusion, current antithrombotic therapy and cytoreductive drugs after an index TIA and stroke in MPN lead to a reduction of cardio-vascular recurrences and mortality in a remarkable proportion of patients, resulting even superior to that in the general population. Overall, the benefit-risk profile of treatment with antithrombotic treatment and cytoreduction in these neoplastic disorders appears favourable, but some categories of patients with TIA and stroke occurring after MPN diagnosis might require special strategies, to be assessed in future studies.
  37 in total

1.  Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  A M Vannucchi; T Barbui; F Cervantes; C Harrison; J-J Kiladjian; N Kröger; J Thiele; C Buske
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Leukocyte-platelet interaction in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Anna Falanga; Marina Marchetti; Alfonso Vignoli; Donatella Balducci; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  One-Year Incidence, Time Trends, and Predictors of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Sweden From 1998 to 2010: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Lisa Bergström; Anna-Lotta Irewall; Lars Söderström; Joachim Ögren; Katarina Laurell; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Gunnar Birgegard; Francisco Cervantes; Guido Finazzi; Martin Griesshammer; Claire Harrison; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Rudiger Hehlmann; Ronald Hoffman; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Nicolaus Kröger; Ruben Mesa; Mary F McMullin; Animesh Pardanani; Francesco Passamonti; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Andreas Reiter; Richard T Silver; Srdan Verstovsek; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Long-term risk and predictors of recurrent stroke beyond the acute phase.

Authors:  Johanna Pennlert; Marie Eriksson; Bo Carlberg; Per-Gunnar Wiklund
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke patients with or without prior stroke.

Authors:  F Buchwald; B Norrving; J Petersson
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  Hydroxyurea for patients with essential thrombocythemia and a high risk of thrombosis.

Authors:  S Cortelazzo; G Finazzi; M Ruggeri; O Vestri; M Galli; F Rodeghiero; T Barbui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: the ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heinz Gisslinger; Mirjana Gotic; Jerzy Holowiecki; Miroslav Penka; Juergen Thiele; Hans-Michael Kvasnicka; Robert Kralovics; Petro E Petrides
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 10.  Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Rita V Krishnamurthi; Valery L Feigin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; George A Mensah; Myles Connor; Derrick A Bennett; Andrew E Moran; Ralph L Sacco; Laurie M Anderson; Thomas Truelsen; Martin O'Donnell; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Carlene M M Lawes; Wenzhi Wang; Yukito Shinohara; Emma Witt; Majid Ezzati; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 26.763

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Disease in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Orly Leiva; Gabriela Hobbs; Katya Ravid; Peter Libby
Journal:  JACC CardioOncol       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 2.  Splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: treatment algorithm 2018.

Authors:  Guido Finazzi; Valerio De Stefano; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.037

3.  Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Valerio De Stefano; Guido Finazzi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.037

4.  Hydroxyurea prevents arterial and late venous thrombotic recurrences in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms but fails in the splanchnic venous district. Pooled analysis of 1500 cases.

Authors:  Valerio De Stefano; Elena Rossi; Alessandra Carobbio; Arianna Ghirardi; Silvia Betti; Guido Finazzi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 11.037

5.  Targeting myeloid cells to prevent recurrent stroke in general population: the lesson of hydroxyurea in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Guido Finazzi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Valerio De Stefano
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Martin Griesshammer; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Carlos Besses
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 7.  Roles of JAK2 in Aging, Inflammation, Hematopoiesis and Malignant Transformation.

Authors:  Florian Perner; Caroline Perner; Thomas Ernst; Florian H Heidel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Clinical outcomes under hydroxyurea treatment in polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Ferrari; Alessandra Carobbio; Arianna Masciulli; Arianna Ghirardi; Guido Finazzi; Valerio De Stefano; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Direct oral anticoagulants for myeloproliferative neoplasms: results from an international study on 442 patients.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Valerio De Stefano; Alessandra Carobbio; Alessandra Iurlo; Alberto Alvarez-Larran; Beatriz Cuevas; Francisca Ferrer Marín; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Francesca Palandri; Claire Harrison; Hassan Sibai; Martin Griesshammer; Massimiliano Bonifacio; Elena M Elli; Chiara Trotti; Steffen Koschmieder; Giuseppe Carli; Giulia Benevolo; Jean-Christophe Ianotto; Swati Goel; Anna Falanga; Silvia Betti; Daniele Cattaneo; Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo; Lara Mannelli; Nicola Vianelli; Andrew Doyle; Vikas Gupta; Kai Wille; Douglas Tremblay; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  An agenda for future research projects in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Paola Guglielmelli; Valerio De Stefano; Alessandro Rambaldi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.