Literature DB >> 29534892

Pros and cons of different therapeutic antibody formats for recombinant antivenom development.

Andreas H Laustsen1, José María Gutiérrez2, Cecilie Knudsen3, Kristoffer H Johansen4, Erick Bermúdez-Méndez3, Felipe A Cerni5, Jonas A Jürgensen3, Line Ledsgaard3, Andrea Martos-Esteban3, Mia Øhlenschlæger3, Urska Pus3, Mikael R Andersen3, Bruno Lomonte2, Mikael Engmark3, Manuela B Pucca6.   

Abstract

Antibody technologies are being increasingly applied in the field of toxinology. Fuelled by the many advances in immunology, synthetic biology, and antibody research, different approaches and antibody formats are being investigated for the ability to neutralize animal toxins. These different molecular formats each have their own therapeutic characteristics. In this review, we provide an overview of the advances made in the development of toxin-targeting antibodies, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of different antibody formats in relation to their ability to neutralize toxins, pharmacokinetic features, propensity to cause adverse reactions, formulation, and expression for research and development (R&D) purposes and large-scale manufacturing. A research trend seems to be emerging towards the use of human antibody formats as well as camelid heavy-domain antibody fragments due to their compatibility with the human immune system, beneficial therapeutic properties, and the ability to manufacture these molecules cost-effectively.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse reactions; Animal envenoming; Antibodies; Antibody expression; Antivenom; Antivenom design; Biotechnology; Immunogenicity; Neglected tropical diseases; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Recombinant antivenom; Scorpion sting; Snakebite; Spider bite; Venom; Venom neutralization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29534892     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  45 in total

1.  Synthetic antibodies block receptor binding and current-inhibiting effects of α-cobratoxin from Naja kaouthia.

Authors:  Shane Miersch; Guillermo de la Rosa; Rasmus Friis; Line Ledsgaard; Kim Boddum; Andreas H Laustsen; Sachdev S Sidhu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Therapeutic Outcome of Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidative Medicines on the Dermonecrotic Activity of Cerastes cerastes Venom.

Authors:  Abderrezak Khelfi; Habiba Oussedik-Oumehdi; Fatima Laraba-Djebari
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.092

3.  Virus-like particles displaying conserved toxin epitopes stimulate polyspecific, murine antibody responses capable of snake venom recognition.

Authors:  Stefanie K Menzies; Charlotte A Dawson; Edouard Crittenden; Rebecca J Edge; Steven R Hall; Jaffer Alsolaiss; Mark C Wilkinson; Nicholas R Casewell; Robert A Harrison; Stuart Ainsworth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  In vitro discovery of a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes lethality of cobra snake venom.

Authors:  Line Ledsgaard; Andreas H Laustsen; Urska Pus; Jack Wade; Pedro Villar; Kim Boddum; Peter Slavny; Edward W Masters; Ana S Arias; Saioa Oscoz; Daniel T Griffiths; Alice M Luther; Majken Lindholm; Rachael A Leah; Marie Sofie Møller; Hanif Ali; John McCafferty; Bruno Lomonte; José M Gutiérrez; Aneesh Karatt-Vellatt
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 5.  A Quest for a Universal Plasma-Derived Antivenom Against All Elapid Neurotoxic Snake Venoms.

Authors:  Kavi Ratanabanangkoon
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Developing Small Molecule Therapeutics for the Initial and Adjunctive Treatment of Snakebite.

Authors:  Tommaso C Bulfone; Stephen P Samuel; Philip E Bickler; Matthew R Lewin
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2018-07-30

7.  Development of Nanobodies Against Hemorrhagic and Myotoxic Components of Bothrops atrox Snake Venom.

Authors:  Henri Bailon Calderon; Verónica Olga Yaniro Coronel; Omar Alberto Cáceres Rey; Elizabeth Gaby Colque Alave; Walter Jhon Leiva Duran; Carlos Padilla Rojas; Harrison Montejo Arevalo; David García Neyra; Marco Galarza Pérez; César Bonilla; Benigno Tintaya; Giulia Ricciardi; Natalia Smiejkowska; Ema Romão; Cécile Vincke; Juan Lévano; Mary Celys; Bruno Lomonte; Serge Muyldermans
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Antivenomic approach of different Crotalus durissus collilineatus venoms.

Authors:  Isadora Sousa de Oliveira; Manuela Berto Pucca; Suely Vilela Sampaio; Eliane Candiani Arantes
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-11-26

Review 9.  Snakebite: When the Human Touch Becomes a Bad Touch.

Authors:  Bryan G Fry
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Pioneering Study on Rhopalurus crassicauda Scorpion Venom: Isolation and Characterization of the Major Toxin and Hyaluronidase.

Authors:  Caio B Abreu; Karla C F Bordon; Felipe A Cerni; Isadora S Oliveira; Carla Balenzuela; Gabriel M Alexandre-Silva; Karina F Zoccal; Mouzarllem B Reis; Gisele A Wiezel; Steve Peigneur; Ernesto L Pinheiro-Júnior; Jan Tytgat; Tiago M Cunha; Loic Quinton; Lúcia H Faccioli; Eliane C Arantes; Umberto Zottich; Manuela B Pucca
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.