Literature DB >> 29534227

Effects of bud-flushing strategies on tree growth.

Raffaele Rani1, Konrad Abramowicz1, Daniel S Falster2, Frank Sterck3, Åke Brännström1,4.   

Abstract

Allocation of carbohydrates between competing organs is fundamental to plant development, growth and productivity. Carbohydrates are synthesized in mature leaves and distributed via the phloem vasculature to developing buds where they are consumed to produce new biomass. The distribution and mass-allocation processes within the plant remain poorly understood and may involve complex feedbacks between different plant functions, with implications for the emergent structure of the plant. Here, we investigate how the order in which dormant buds are flushed affects the development of tree size and reproductive output during the first 20 years of growth in full light and shaded canopy environments. We report the following findings: (i) Bud-flushing strategies strongly affect the temporal dynamics of height, mass and the size of reproduction pool, as well as the resulting architectures. (ii) Bud-flushing strategies affect tree growth by altering the rate of growth and final size of trees. (iii) No single bud-flushing strategy performs best when both the size and allocation for reproduction of the resulting trees are compared. However, we observe that the strategy that optimizes the net carbon gain for the entire tree architecture always results in a high reproduction output. (iv) Branch turnover and meristem regeneration enhance the performance of certain strategies with respect to the measured quantities. These results highlight the importance of employing generic models of architecture (i.e., non-species-specific) to identify general mechanisms of carbon allocation and the spatial distribution of newly formed biomass in growing trees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29534227     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpy005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  1 in total

1.  Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence.

Authors:  Tong Qiu; Marie-Claire Aravena; Robert Andrus; Davide Ascoli; Yves Bergeron; Roberta Berretti; Michal Bogdziewicz; Thomas Boivin; Raul Bonal; Thomas Caignard; Rafael Calama; J Julio Camarero; Connie J Clark; Benoit Courbaud; Sylvain Delzon; Sergio Donoso Calderon; William Farfan-Rios; Catherine A Gehring; Gregory S Gilbert; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Ines Ibanez; Valentin Journé; Christopher L Kilner; Richard K Kobe; Walter D Koenig; Georges Kunstler; Jalene M LaMontagne; Mateusz Ledwon; James A Lutz; Renzo Motta; Jonathan A Myers; Thomas A Nagel; Chase L Nuñez; Ian S Pearse; Łukasz Piechnik; John R Poulsen; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; C Lane Scher; Harald Schmidt Van Marle; Barbara Seget; Shubhi Sharma; Miles Silman; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Maria Uriarte; Giorgio Vacchiano; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; S Joseph Wright; Kai Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman; Magdalena Żywiec; James S Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.