| Literature DB >> 29534046 |
Giuliana M Vila Verde1, Diogo A Barros2, Marilene Silva Oliveira3, Gilberto L B Aquino4, Danilo M Santos5, José Realino de Paula6, Lucas D Dias7, Marta Piñeiro8, Mariette M Pereira9.
Abstract
Microwave-assisted extraction of volatile oils (MAE) potentially offers a more efficient and bio-sustainable method than conventional extraction by Clevenger apparatus (CE). This study aimed to optimise the MAE of the volatile oil from Pterodon emarginatus fruits and characterise the volatile compounds. A 2³ full-factorial central composite design and response surface methodology were used to evaluate the effects of time (min), moisture (%) and microwave power (W) on the extraction yield. The process optimisation was based on the desirability function approach. The reaction time and moisture conditions were standardised in these analyses. The volatile oil composition was analysed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) in order to compare techniques extractions influences. Microwave irradiation showed excellent performance for extraction of the volatile oil from Pterodon emarginatus and there were some advantages in compare to conventional method with respect to the time (14 times), energy (6 times), reagents amounts and waste formation. About chemical composition presents significant differences with the type of extraction. Caryophyllene (25.65%) and trans-α-bisabolol (6.24%) were identified as major components in MAE sample while caryophyllene (6.75%) and γ-elemene (7.02%) are the components with higher relative percentage in CE samples. The microwaves assisted process shown an increase of economic interested compounds present in volatile oil.Entities:
Keywords: Pterodon emarginatus; analytical eco-scale; extraction; microwave; optimisation; terpenes; volatile oil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29534046 PMCID: PMC6017837 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23030651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Optimisation experimental results of the extraction process yield and volume of volatile oil obtained from P. emarginatus fruits.
| Run | Time | Moisture | Power | Yield | Vol. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21(−1) | 44(−1) | 220(−1) | 1.6 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 21(−1) | 44(−1) | 280(+1) | 5.3 | 1.6 |
| 3 | 21(−1) | 56(+1) | 220(−1) | 3.3 | 1.0 |
| 4 | 21(−1) | 56(+1) | 280(+1) | 5.3 | 1.6 |
| 5 | 39(+1) | 44 (−1) | 220(−1) | 3.3 | 1.0 |
| 6 | 39(+1) | 44 (−1) | 280(+1) | 6.6 | 2.0 |
| 7 | 39(+1) | 56(+1) | 220(−1) | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| 8 | 39(+1) | 56(+1) | 280(+1) | 6.0 | 1.8 |
| 9 | 30(0) | 50(0) | 250(0) | 3.6 | 1.1 |
| 10 | 30(0) | 50(0) | 250(0) | 3.6 | 1.1 |
| 11 | 30(0) | 50(0) | 250(0) | 3.3 | 1.0 |
| 12 | 30(0) | 50(0) | 250(0) | 3.6 | 1.1 |
| 13 | 30(0) | 50(0) | 250(0) | 3.6 | 1.1 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results.
| Source of Variation a | Sum of Square | df | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 3.65 | 1 | 3.65 | 202.50 | 0.00014 b |
| X12 | 3.14 | 1 | 3.14 | 174.38 | 0.00019 b |
| X2 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.98 | 54.44 | 0.00180 b |
| X3 | 12.50 | 1 | 12.50 | 694.44 | 0.00001 b |
| X1X2 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 2.50 | 0.18900 d |
| X1X3 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 13.61 | 0.02103 c |
| X2X3 | 2.00 | 1 | 2.00 | 111.11 | 0.00046 b |
| Lack of fit | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 2.50 | 0.18900 d |
| Pure error | 0.07 | 4 | 0.02 | ||
| Total sum of squares | 22.67 | 12 | |||
| 0.9876 |
a X1 = Time (min.); X2 = Moisture (%); X3 = Power (W); b Significant at p < 0.01; c Significant at p < 0.05; d Not significant.
Figure 1Response surface plots show the effect of time (min), moisture (%) and microwave power (W) on the extraction yield (%) (a) the yield values increased as time and power increased; (b) the yield values increased the extraction time in combination with moisture; (c) The yield values increased when low moisture and high power were tested.
Figure 2Profiles of predicted response values and desirability function. The red lines indicate experimental values after optimisation.
Yield of P. emarginatus volatile oil by microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) compared to conventional extraction (CE).
| Extraction | Medium Volume and Medium Yield | |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (mL) | Yield (% | |
| MAE | 1.73 | 5.76 |
| CE* | 1.80 | 3.60 |
| CE** | 0.22 | 0.44 |
* conventional extraction during 4 h; ** conventional extraction during 39 min.
Penalty points (PPs) for conventional extraction method versus microwave extraction method analysed by Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).
| Methods | Conventional | PPs | Microwave | PPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reagents | Biomass Sample: 50 g | 2 | Biomass Sample: 30 g | 2 |
| H2O: 500 mL | 3 | H2O: 13.2 mL | 2 | |
| Instruments | Hot plate (2.6 kW/h) | 2 | Microwave | 0 |
| GC/MS | 2 | GC/MS | 2 | |
| Occupation hazard | 0 | Occupation hazard | 0 | |
| Waste | 5 | Waste | 5 | |
| Total Penalty Points | 14 | 11 | ||
| Analytical Eco-Scale Score | 86 | 89 | ||
Chemical composition and respective percentages of the main constituents in the volatile oil obtained by microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and conventional extraction (CE) of P. emarginatus fruits.
| RI | Compound | MAE (%) | CE (%) | Chemical Properties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1436 | γ-Elemene | 1.16 | 7.02 | Molecular formula C15H24 |
| 1376 | α-Copaene | 3.54 | 1.05 | Molecular formula C15H24 |
| 1494 | 25.65 | 6.75 | Molecular formula C15H24 | |
| 1454 | α-Humulene | 4.92 | 2.49 | Molecular formula C15H24 |
| 1531 | 6.24 | -- | Molecular formula C15H24 | |
| 1469 | allo-Aromadendrene | 1.31 | 0.92 | Molecular formula C15H24 |
| 1523 | 1.23 | 0.70 | Molecular formula C15H24 | |
| 1479 | γ-Muurolene | Molecular formula C15H24 |
Uncoded and coded levels of the independent variables used to extract the volatile oil from P. emarginatus fruits.
| Variables | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| X1 | 21 | 30 | 39 |
| X2 | 44 | 50 | 56 |
| X3 | 220 | 250 | 280 |
X1 = extraction time (min); X2 = moisture (%); X3 = power microwave irradiation (W).