Literature DB >> 29533881

A workflow for improving estimates of microplastic contamination in marine waters: A case study from North-Western Australia.

Frederieke Kroon1, Cherie Motti2, Sam Talbot2, Paula Sobral3, Marji Puotinen4.   

Abstract

Plastic pollution is ubiquitous throughout the marine environment, with microplastic (i.e. <5 mm) contamination a global issue of emerging concern. The lack of universally accepted methods for quantifying microplastic contamination, including consistent application of microscopy, photography, an spectroscopy and photography, may result in unrealistic contamination estimates. Here, we present and apply an analysis workflow tailored to quantifying microplastic contamination in marine waters, incorporating stereomicroscopic visual sorting, microscopic photography and attenuated total reflectance (ATR) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The workflow outlines step-by-step processing and associated decision making, thereby reducing bias in plastic identification and improving confidence in contamination estimates. Specific processing steps include (i) the use of a commercial algorithm-based comparison of particle spectra against an extensive commercially curated spectral library, followed by spectral interpretation to establish the chemical composition, (ii) a comparison against a customised contaminant spectral library to eliminate procedural contaminants, and (iii) final assignment of particles as either natural- or anthropogenic-derived materials, based on chemical type, a compare analysis of each particle against other particle spectra, and physical characteristics of particles. Applying this workflow to 54 tow samples collected in marine waters of North-Western Australia visually identified 248 potential anthropogenic particles. Subsequent ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, chemical assignment and visual re-inspection of photographs established 144 (58%) particles to be of anthropogenic origin. Of the original 248 particles, 97 (39%) were ultimately confirmed to be plastics, with 85 of these (34%) classified as microplastics, demonstrating that over 60% of particles may be misidentified as plastics if visual identification is not complemented by spectroscopy. Combined, this tailored analysis workflow outlines a consistent and sequential process to quantify contamination by microplastics and other anthropogenic microparticles in marine waters. Importantly, its application will contribute to more realistic estimates of microplastic contamination in marine waters, informing both ecological risk assessments and experimental concentrations in effect studies.
Copyright © 2018 Australian Institute of Marine Science. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anthropogenic; FTIR; Microparticles; Spectroscopy; Tows

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533881     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  8 in total

1.  New toxic emerging contaminants: beyond the toxicological effects.

Authors:  Carlos Lodeiro; José Luis Capelo; Elisabete Oliveira; Javier Fernández Lodeiro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Validation of an optimised protocol for quantification of microplastics in heterogenous samples: A case study using green turtle chyme.

Authors:  Alexandra G M Caron; Colette R Thomas; Kathryn L E Berry; Cherie A Motti; Ellen Ariel; Jon E Brodie
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-08-10

Review 3.  Classification of marine microdebris: A review and case study on fish from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

Authors:  Frederieke J Kroon; Cherie E Motti; Lene H Jensen; Kathryn L E Berry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sources, distribution and fate of microfibres on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

Authors:  Lene H Jensen; Cherie A Motti; Anders L Garm; Hemerson Tonin; Frederieke J Kroon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Microplastics in seawater: sampling strategies, laboratory methodologies, and identification techniques applied to port environment.

Authors:  Laura Cutroneo; Anna Reboa; Giovanni Besio; Franco Borgogno; Laura Canesi; Susanna Canuto; Manuela Dara; Francesco Enrile; Iskender Forioso; Giuseppe Greco; Véronique Lenoble; Arianna Malatesta; Stéphane Mounier; Mario Petrillo; Ruben Rovetta; Alessandro Stocchino; Javier Tesan; Greta Vagge; Marco Capello
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of microplastics in marine organisms: A review and meta-analysis of current data.

Authors:  Michaela E Miller; Mark Hamann; Frederieke J Kroon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cross-Hemisphere Study Reveals Geographically Ubiquitous, Plastic-Specific Bacteria Emerging from the Rare and Unexplored Biosphere.

Authors:  Brittan S Scales; Rachel N Cable; Melissa B Duhaime; Gunnar Gerdts; Franziska Fischer; Dieter Fischer; Stephanie Mothes; Lisa Hintzki; Lynn Moldaenke; Matthias Ruwe; Jörn Kalinowski; Bernd Kreikemeyer; Maria-Luiza Pedrotti; Gaby Gorsky; Amanda Elineau; Matthias Labrenz; Sonja Oberbeckmann
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 8.  Analysis of microplastics in drinking water and other clean water samples with micro-Raman and micro-infrared spectroscopy: minimum requirements and best practice guidelines.

Authors:  Darena Schymanski; Barbara E Oßmann; Nizar Benismail; Kada Boukerma; Gerald Dallmann; Elisabeth von der Esch; Dieter Fischer; Franziska Fischer; Douglas Gilliland; Karl Glas; Thomas Hofmann; Andrea Käppler; Sílvia Lacorte; Julie Marco; Maria El Rakwe; Jana Weisser; Cordula Witzig; Nicole Zumbülte; Natalia P Ivleva
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.142

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.