Literature DB >> 29533877

Fate, morals and rational calculations: Freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey.

Azer Kılıç1, İpek Göçmen2.   

Abstract

This article aims to explore women's decisions to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. It draws on semi-structured interviews conducted with twenty-one women who were either in the process of freezing their eggs, or had completed the process within the previous year. Being highly educated and holding prestigious occupations, on the one hand, and faced with traditional gender norms, on the other, these women are confronted with a challenging decision. When making such a decision to freeze their eggs, women act under the constraints defined by biomedical paradigms, the society they live in, and the future uncertainty of their lives. However, it becomes apparent that women are able to reconcile different kinds of rationalities and concerns in their decisions to freeze eggs. They engage in rational calculations to find a solution to their reproductive concerns; they turn to their own belief systems when dealing with future uncertainty; and they negotiate social norms concerning virginity, while trying to conform to traditional reproductive roles.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Egg freezing; Expectations; Gender; Medicalization; Rationality; Social norms; Turkey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533877     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  The emergence of temporality in attitudes towards cryo-fertility: a case study comparing German and Israeli social egg freezing users.

Authors:  Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.452

2.  Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha Yee; Carly V Goodman; Vivian Fu; Nechama J Lipton; Michal Dviri; Jordana Mashiach; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Women's viewpoints on egg freezing in Austria: an online Q-methodology study.

Authors:  Johanna Kostenzer; Antoinette de Bont; Job van Exel
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Between "Medical" and "Social" Egg Freezing : A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty; Johanna Kostenzer; Lisa-Katharina Sismuth; Antoinette de Bont
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women's quality of care.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Lynn M Westphal; Joseph Doyle; Norbert Gleicher; Dror Meirow; Martha Dirnfeld; Daniel Seidman; Arik Kahane; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Decision regret and associated factors following oocyte cryopreservation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or age-related fertility decline.

Authors:  Aysen Gurbuz; Aylin Pelin Cil; Lale Suzan Karakis; Remzi Abali; Mehmet Ceyhan; Ece Aksakal; Azer Kilic; Mustafa Bahceci; Bulent Urman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 8.  Elective egg freezing: what is the vision of women around the globe?

Authors:  Susan Nasab; Lindsey Ulin; Chikara Nkele; Jaimin Shah; Mazen E Abdallah; Baha M Sibai
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-03-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.