Literature DB >> 29533271

Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: The role of organizations, teams, and individuals.

Christopher M Shea1, Kea Turner, Jordan Albritton, Kristin L Reiter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis on value-based health care has highlighted the importance of quality improvement (QI) in primary care settings. QI efforts, which require providers and staff to work in cross-functional teams, may be implemented with varying levels of success, with implementation being affected by factors at the organizational, teamwork, and individual levels.
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to (a) identify contextual factors (organizational, teamwork, and individual) that affect implementation effectiveness of QI interventions in primary care settings and (b) compare perspectives about these factors across roles (health care administrators, physician and nonphysician clinicians, and administrative staff). METHODS/APPROACH: We conducted semistructured interviews with 24 health care administrators, physician and nonphysician primary care providers, and administrative staff representing 10 primary care practices affiliated with one integrated delivery system.
RESULTS: Participants across all roles identified similar organizational- and team-level factors that influence QI implementation including organizational capacity to take on new initiatives (e.g., time availability of physicians), technical capability for QI (e.g., data analysis skills), and team climate (e.g., how well staff work together). There was greater variation in terms of individual-level factors, particularly perceived meaning and purpose of QI. Perceptions about value of QI ranged from positive impacts on patient care and practice competitiveness to decreased efficiency and distractions from patient care, but differences did not appear attributable to role.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful QI implementation requires effective collaboration within cross-functional teams. Additional research is needed to assess how best to employ implementation strategies that promote cross-understanding of QI among team members and, ultimately, effective implementation of QI programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care managers in primary care settings should strive to create a strong teamwork climate, reinforced by opportunities for staff in various roles to discuss QI as a collective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533271      PMCID: PMC5976517          DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  20 in total

1.  Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Jeffrey A Alexander; Stephen M Shortell; Laurence C Baker; Mark Becker; Jeffrey J Geppert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  How teams work--or don't--in primary care: a field study on internal medicine practices.

Authors:  Benjamin J Chesluk; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  CMS--engaging multiple payers in payment reform.

Authors:  Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of New Funding Models for Patient-Centered Medical Homes on Primary Care Practice Finances and Services: Results of a Microsimulation Model.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Russell S Phillips; Zirui Song; Bruce E Landon; Asaf Bitton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Erum Nadeem; S Serene Olin; Laura Campbell Hill; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Sarah McCue Horwitz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  The meaning and measurement of implementation climate.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Charles M Belden; Dawn M Bergmire; Matthew Johnston
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Using 'appreciative inquiry' in India to improve infection control practices in maternity care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Bharati Sharma; K V Ramani; Dileep Mavalankar; Lovney Kanguru; Julia Hussein
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 9.  Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.

Authors:  Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Thomas J Waltz; Matthew J Chinman; Laura J Damschroder; Jeffrey L Smith; Monica M Matthieu; Enola K Proctor; JoAnn E Kirchner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  9 in total

1.  Exploring the sustainability of perinatal audit in four district hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa: a multiple case study approach.

Authors:  Mary Kinney; Anne-Marie Bergh; Natasha Rhoda; Robert Pattinson; Asha George
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-06

2.  The perception of health care quality by primary health care managers in Ukraine.

Authors:  Valentyna Anufriyeva; Milena Pavlova; Tetiana Stepurko; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Examining the Unconscious Racial Biases and Attitudes of Physicians, Nurses, and the Public: Implications for Future Health Care Education and Practice.

Authors:  Danielle D Jones
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Exploring implementation processes in general practice in a feedback intervention aiming to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing: a qualitative study among general practitioners.

Authors:  Kirsten Høj; Anna Mygind; Flemming Bro
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-01-07

5.  A Quality Improvement Intervention to Inform Scale-Up of Integrated HIV-TB Services: Lessons Learned From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Santhanalakshmi Gengiah; Kogieleum Naidoo; Regina Mlobeli; Maureen F Tshabalala; Andrew J Nunn; Nesri Padayatchi; Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma; Myra Taylor; Pierre M Barker; Marian Loveday
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2021-09-30

6.  Evidence-Based Policymaking: What Human Service Agencies Can Learn from Implementation Science and Integrated Data Systems.

Authors:  Sharon Zanti; M Lori Thomas
Journal:  Glob Implement Res Appl       Date:  2021-11-01

7.  What GPs do to meet accreditation standards - implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation.

Authors:  Cecilie Mølgaard; Flemming Bro; Anna Mygind
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-10-15

Review 8.  The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.

Authors:  Emma Coles; Julie Anderson; Margaret Maxwell; Fiona M Harris; Nicola M Gray; Gill Milner; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-26

9.  Contextual factors influencing the implementation of innovations in community-based primary health care: the experience of 12 Canadian research teams.

Authors:  Jenny Ploeg; Sabrina T Wong; Kasra Hassani; Marie-Lee Yous; Martin Fortin; Claire Kendall; Clare Liddy; Maureen Markle-Reid; Bojana Petrovic; Emilie Dionne; Cathie M Scott; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 1.458

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.