Literature DB >> 29533254

Risk Factors for Titanium Mesh Implant Exposure Following Cranioplasty.

Talha Maqbool1,2, Adam Binhammer2, Paul Binhammer2, Oleh M Antonyshyn2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Titanium mesh is used to reconstruct the neurocranium in cranioplasties. Though it is generally well-tolerated, erosion of the overlying soft tissue with exposure of the implant is a complication that adversely affects patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate potential risk factors for titanium mesh exposure.
METHODS: This study comprises all consecutive patients who underwent titanium mesh cranioplasty between January 2000 and July 2016. A retrospective chart review was conducted to extract demographics, details of management, and outcome. Latest postoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to document the thickness of soft tissue coverage over the implant and the presence of significant extradural dead space deep to it.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Implant exposure occurred in 7 (14%), while threatened exposure was observed in 1 additional patient, for a total complication count of 8 (16%).Four (50%) exposure and 3 (7.1%) nonexposure patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 19.67, P = 0.018). Similarly, 4 (50%) exposure and 5 (11.9%) nonexposure patients had a free flap tissue transfer for implant coverage (OR = 6.50, P = 0.046). Postoperative computed tomography scans revealed significant thinning of soft tissues over titanium mesh in 7 (87.5%) exposure and 15 (35.7%) nonexposure patients (OR = 10.71 P = 0.040). No significant association was found between transposition/rotation flap, postoperative radiotherapy, or the presence of significant extradural dead space, and exposure (P = 0.595, P = 0.999, P = 0.44).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiotherapy, free flap coverage, and soft tissue atrophy resulted in greater odds of titanium mesh exposure. The findings of this study provide important considerations for reconstructive surgeons using titanium mesh for cranioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533254     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  [Application of two-stage operation on free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transplantation and skull contour reconstruction in treatment of head titanium mesh exposure with soft tissue infection].

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yudi Han; Lei Cui; Jun Shu; Lingli Guo; Ran Tao; Yonghong Lei; Yan Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Long-term Effect of Cranioplasty on Overlying Scalp Atrophy.

Authors:  Grzegorz J Kwiecien; Nicholas Sinclair; Demetrius M Coombs; Risal S Djohan; David Mihal; James E Zins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  The potential application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in vestibuloplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Amiri; Nima Farshidfar; Shahram Hamedani
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Correction of malocclusion using sliding fibula osteotomy with sagittal split ramus osteotomy after mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  Dong-Hun Lee; Seong Ryoung Kim; Sam Jang; Kang-Min Ahn; Jee-Ho Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.

Authors:  Adam Binhammer; Josie Jakubowski; Oleh Antonyshyn; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 6.  Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Corrado Iaccarino; Angelos G Kolias; Louis-Georges Roumy; Kostas Fountas; Amos Olufemi Adeleye
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.