| Literature DB >> 29532333 |
Lindon W K Moodie1,2, Gunnar Cervin3, Rozenn Trepos4, Christophe Labriere5, Claire Hellio4, Henrik Pavia3, Johan Svenson5,6.
Abstract
By combining the recently reported repelling natural dihydrostilbene scaffold with an oxime moiety found in many marine antifoulants, a library of nine antifouling hybrid compounds was developed and biologically evaluated. The prepared compounds were shown to display a low antifouling effect against marine bacteria but a high potency against the attachment and growth of microalgae down to MIC values of 0.01 μg/mL for the most potent hybrid. The mode of action can be characterized as repelling via a reversible non-toxic biostatic mechanism. Barnacle cyprid larval settlement was also inhibited at low μg/mL concentrations with low levels or no toxicity observed. Several of the prepared compounds performed better than many reported antifouling marine natural products. While several of the prepared compounds are highly active as antifoulants, no apparent synergy is observed by incorporating the oxime functionality into the dihydrostilbene scaffold. This observation is discussed in light of recently reported literature data on related marine natural antifoulants and antifouling hybrids as a potentially general strategy for generation of improved antifoulants.Entities:
Keywords: Antifouling; Batatasin; Dihydrostilbene; Hybrid; Ianthelline; Oxime
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29532333 PMCID: PMC5889410 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-018-9802-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Biotechnol (NY) ISSN: 1436-2228 Impact factor: 3.619
Fig. 1Top: representative antifouling compounds and corresponding IC50 activities against Balanus improvises larvae settlement; 1 (Moodie et al. 2017b), 2 (Moodie et al. 2017b), 3 (Hanssen et al. 2014), 4 (minimum significant dose to inhibit settlement) (Ortlepp et al. 2007), 5 (Ortlepp et al. 2007), 6 (Moodie et al. 2017b). Lower left panel: Empetrum nigrum (the common crowberry), a very prolific producer of 1 which is used to control competing plant species and recently shown to also be a highly potent marine antifoulant. Lower right panel: Specimen of the Arctic sponge Stryphnus fortis from which the oxime containing marine antifoulant ianthelline has been isolated
Fig. 2Hybrid dihydrostilbene-oxime compounds 7–15 and two general synthetic routes employed
Biofouling microorganisms included in present study
| Species | Abbreviation | Code |
|---|---|---|
| Microalgae | Algobank code | |
| | AC 713 | |
| | AC 32 | |
| | AC 170 | |
| | AC 122 | |
| Marine bacteria | ATCCa | |
| |
| 35,048 |
| |
| 35,084 |
| |
| 700,106 |
| |
| 14,058 |
| |
| 53,559 |
| |
| 14,400 |
| |
| 49,566 |
| |
| 8,071 |
| |
| 700,159 |
| |
| 700,398 |
aAmerican tissue culture code
MIC (μg/mL) of compounds 9, 13, 14, and 15 against the adhesion of marine bacteria
| Compounda |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| –b | – | – | – | 10 |
|
| 0.1 | – | – | – | – |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | – | 10 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | – | 10 |
| Sea-nine™c | 1 | < 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| Ianthellined | 0.1 | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
Tested strains: Vibrio aestuarianus, Vibrio carchariae, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio natriegens, Vibrio proteolyticus, Halomonas aquamarina, Roseobacter litoralis, Shewanella putrefaciens, Polaribacter irgensii, and Pseudoalteromonas elyakovii. No activity was observed for all compounds against V.n., R.l., S.p., P.e., and P.i
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration
aCompounds 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12 were inactive against the adhesion of all bacteria tested up to 10 μg/mL
bNot active at > 10 μg/mL
cData from Trepos et al. (2015)
dData from Hanssen et al. (2014)
eData from Moodie et al. (2017b)
MIC (μg/mL) of compounds 7–14 against the growth of marine bacteria
| Compounda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10 | 10 | 1 | –b | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 10 | – | 1 | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 10 | – | 0.1 | – |
|
| – | – | – | 10 | – | – | – | – | 1 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 10 | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 10 |
|
| – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | – |
| Sea-nine™c | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 0.1 |
| Ianthellined | 0.1 | – | 10 | – | 10 | – | 1 | 0.1 | 1 |
|
| 10 | – | – | – | – | 0.01 | 10 | 0.1 | 10 |
Tested strains: Vibrio aestuarianus, Vibrio carchariae, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio natriegens, Vibrio proteolyticus, Halomonas aquamarina, Roseobacter litoralis, Shewanella putrefaciens, Polaribacter irgensii, and Pseudoalteromonas elyakovii. No activity was observed for all compounds against P.i
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration
aCompound 15 was inactive against the growth of all bacteria tested up to 10 μg/mL
bNot active at > 10 μg/mL
cData from Trepos et al. (2015)
dData from Hanssen et al. (2014)
eData from Moodie et al. (2017b)
MIC (μg/mL) of compounds 7–15 against the adhesion (A) and growth (G) of microalgae
| Compound |
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | –a | – |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | – | 10 | 10 | – | – |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | 10 | – | 10 | – | 10 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | – | – | – | – |
|
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | – | – |
|
| 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Sea-nine™b | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| Ianthellinec | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 |
|
| 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 10 | 1 |
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration
aNot active at > 10 μg/mL
bData from Trepos et al. (2015)
cData from Hanssen et al. (2014)
dData from Moodie et al. (2017b)
Fig. 3Effects of compounds 7–15 at 5 μg/mL on the settlement of B. improvisus cyprid larvae presented as percentages of settled (black columns), free swimming (light gray columns), and dead cyprids (dark gray columns) and given as means ± standard error (n = 4) (A). Filtered seawater (SW) and DMSO (0.1%, v/v) in SW were used as the negative control. Dose response analysis (0.2–5.0 μg/mL) of compounds 14 and 15 on the settlement inhibition of B. improvisus cyprid larvae (B). The columns are annotated as in method “A” above
Potency and toxicity of compounds 7–15 against the barnacle B. improvisus
| Compound | IC50 (μg/mL) | Toxicity (%)a |
|---|---|---|
|
| 2.5 | 5.8 |
|
| 5.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 1.5 | 0.0 |
|
| 5.0 | 2.6 |
|
| > 5.0 | 5.3 |
|
| 2.5 | 3.5 |
|
| 5.0 | 1.6 |
|
| 1.0 | 4.8 |
|
| 0.75 | 42.9 |
| Sea-nine™ | 0.25 | n.db |
| Ianthellinec | 3.0 | 10.0 |
|
| 0.75 | 5.3 |
aReported at 5 μg/mL. Toxicity for the negative control DMSO (0.1%, v/v) in filtered seawater was 2.4%
bNot determined
cData from Hanssen et al. (2014)
dData from Moodie et al. (2017b)