Literature DB >> 29532280

Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study.

Yoann Guntzburger1, Thierry C Pauchant2, Philippe A Tanguy3.   

Abstract

The complexity of industrial reality, the plurality of legitimate perspectives on risks and the role of emotions in decision-making raise important ethical issues in risk management that are usually overlooked in engineering. Using a questionnaire answered by 200 engineering students from a major engineering school in Canada, the purpose of this study was to assess how their training has influenced their perceptions toward these issues. While our results challenge the stereotypical portrait of the engineer, they also suggest that the current engineering education might fail to empower engineers to engage in ethical risk management. We therefore propose an active-learning method to help in this matter. Carried out through workshops with 34 students in chemical engineering, the effectiveness of this method has been evaluated using group interviews and questionnaires. Our results suggest that such an approach is effective, at least in the short run, to motivate students to engage in ethical risk management and to trigger reflectivity on what it means to be an engineer today.

Keywords:  Empowerment; Engineering education; Ethical risk management; Reflectivity; Self-efficacy; Self-knowledge

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532280     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions.

Authors:  Sabine Roeser
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach.

Authors:  Eddie Conlon; Henk Zandvoort
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions.

Authors:  S K Parker
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1998-12

4.  Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Stephanie N Seiler; Bradley J Brummel; Kerri L Anderson; Kyoung Jin Kim; Serena Wee; C K Gunsalus; Michael C Loui
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis.

Authors:  E M Ozer; A Bandura
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-03

6.  The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Kalina J Michalska; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Risk and responsibility: a complex and evolving relationship.

Authors:  Céline Kermisch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Emotional engineers: toward morally responsible design.

Authors:  Sabine Roeser
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Moral responsibility, technology, and experiences of the tragic: from Kierkegaard to offshore engineering.

Authors:  Mark Coeckelbergh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.