Literature DB >> 29532215

Tobacco Control Policy Adoption Dynamics: A Case Study of Missouri Communities.

Kevin D Everett1, Ginny Chadwick2, Stanley R Cowan2, Emily Kinkade3.   

Abstract

Tobacco control policies reduce the health and economic burden caused by tobacco. With over half of the United States communities lacking adequate protective policies, an examination of policy adoption factors can provide insights to facilitate policy adoption. A case study approach examines the rate of adoption, prominent media frames, policy leaders' perceptions and coalition activities for smokefree and Tobacco 21 policies adopted in Missouri. Findings show compared to smokefree policy, Tobacco 21 requires a considerably shorter timeframe and fewer resources for adoption. Tobacco 21 coalitions target a small group of stakeholders compared to smokefree coalitions' emphasis on broad community engagement. Both policies are formally opposed, but elected officials perceive less political risk supporting Tobacco 21. As a new tobacco control policy tool, Tobacco 21 has relative advantage that should be considered by community health advocates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Relative advantage; Smokefree policy; Social construction; Tobacco 21; Tobacco control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532215     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-018-0487-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  9 in total

1.  Diffusion of preventive innovations.

Authors:  Everett M Rogers
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard.

Authors:  David T Levy; Frank Chaloupka; Joseph Gitchell
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

3.  Community reductions in youth smoking after raising the minimum tobacco sales age to 21.

Authors:  Shari Kessel Schneider; Stephen L Buka; Kim Dash; Jonathan P Winickoff; Lydia O'Donnell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, and asthma after implementation of Arizona's comprehensive statewide smoking ban.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Michele E Walsh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Are tobacco control policies effective in reducing young adult smoking?

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Brett R Loomis; Nicole Kuiper; Beth Han; Joseph Gfroerer; Ralph S Caraballo; Terry F Pechacek; G Lance Couzens
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Association of Smoke-Free Laws With Lower Percentages of New and Current Smokers Among Adolescents and Young Adults: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Anna V Song; Lauren M Dutra; Torsten B Neilands; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Strategies implemented by 20 local tobacco control agencies to promote smoke-free recreation areas, California, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Diana Cassady; Jeanette Treiber; Cathy Lemp
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Characteristics of Community Newspaper Coverage of Tobacco Control and Its Relationship to the Passage of Tobacco Ordinances.

Authors:  Petya Eckler; Shelly Rodgers; Kevin Everett
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-10

Review 9.  The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard.

Authors:  David T Levy; Jamie Tam; Charlene Kuo; Geoffrey T Fong; Frank Chaloupka
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Adoption of Tobacco 21: A Cross-Case Analysis of Ten US States.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Marin Kurti; Jenna Howard; Bianca Sanabria; Kevin R J Schroth; Mary Hrywna; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.