PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate of colorectal neoplasia showing histologic lateral margin involvement after en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: We reviewed 527 colorectal lesions that were removed by en bloc ESD from 2005 to 2013 and followed by endoscopy. Based on the postprocedural pathologic reports, the lesions were categorized as follows: lesions with clear deep and positive lateral margins (n = 63) and lesions with R0 resection (n = 299). RESULTS: The tumor size was 45.7 ± 21.1 mm in the lateral margin-positive group and 30.6 ± 15.1 in the R0 group (P < 0.001). Procedure time was longer in the lateral margin-positive group than in the R0 group (94.3 ± 75.1 vs. 54.1 ± 48.9 min; P < 0.001). Lateral margin positivity was associated with ESD time ≥ 120 min in the multivariate analysis. Compared with 0-I morphology, LST-G was significantly associated with the lateral margin positivity. The volume of ESD experience in endoscopists may also be associated with the lateral margin positivity. Histologic reassessment of the specimen suggested that 32.2% of lateral margin-positive cases based on the initial pathology report were false-positive lateral margin involvement. The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 0.6% in the R0 group and 5% in the margin-positive group (P = 0.198). CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence rate was not higher in lateral margin-positive cases than in R0 resection cases if the colorectal epithelial neoplasia was removed in an en bloc manner using ESD. Meticulous pathologic interpretation may reduce unnecessarily frequent surveillance after en bloc ESD.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate of colorectal neoplasia showing histologic lateral margin involvement after en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: We reviewed 527 colorectal lesions that were removed by en bloc ESD from 2005 to 2013 and followed by endoscopy. Based on the postprocedural pathologic reports, the lesions were categorized as follows: lesions with clear deep and positive lateral margins (n = 63) and lesions with R0 resection (n = 299). RESULTS: The tumor size was 45.7 ± 21.1 mm in the lateral margin-positive group and 30.6 ± 15.1 in the R0 group (P < 0.001). Procedure time was longer in the lateral margin-positive group than in the R0 group (94.3 ± 75.1 vs. 54.1 ± 48.9 min; P < 0.001). Lateral margin positivity was associated with ESD time ≥ 120 min in the multivariate analysis. Compared with 0-I morphology, LST-G was significantly associated with the lateral margin positivity. The volume of ESD experience in endoscopists may also be associated with the lateral margin positivity. Histologic reassessment of the specimen suggested that 32.2% of lateral margin-positive cases based on the initial pathology report were false-positive lateral margin involvement. The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 0.6% in the R0 group and 5% in the margin-positive group (P = 0.198). CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence rate was not higher in lateral margin-positive cases than in R0 resection cases if the colorectal epithelial neoplasia was removed in an en bloc manner using ESD. Meticulous pathologic interpretation may reduce unnecessarily frequent surveillance after en bloc ESD.
Authors: R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe Journal: Gut Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 23.059