Literature DB >> 29532114

Peri-operative complications of lumbar spine surgery in patients over eighty five years of age: a retrospective cohort study.

Shingo Onda1, Masahiro Kanayama2, Tomoyuki Hashimoto2, Fumihiro Oha2, Akira Iwata2, Masaru Tanaka2, Kazuo Kaneko3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare peri-operative complication rates in ≥ 85-year-old patients who underwent decompression surgery with or without instrumented fusion for degenerative disorders.
METHODS: This study involved 907 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disorders between January 2006 and June 2012. Of these, 33 patients (3.6% of the entire population) were over 85 years of age (85-94 years). Decompression-alone and instrumentation groups were compared in terms of comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-physical status (PS) class, peri-operative complications, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores.
RESULTS: Thirty-three ≥ 85-year-old patients underwent surgery. All were ASA-PS class 2 (94%) or 3. The decompression-alone (n = 19) and instrumentation (n = 14) groups did not differ in comorbidity (95 vs. 100%, P = 0.383) or ASA-PS class (P = 0.561). Both exhibited improved JOA scores (decompression-alone: 13.4/29 to 22.7/29; instrumentation: 8.6/29 to 17.9/29; P = 0.9068) and had similar peri-operative complication rates (21.0 vs. 28.5%, P = 0.374).
CONCLUSIONS: Although instrumentation is considered more invasive than decompression, we detected no statistically significant differences in peri-operative complication rates between these two types of surgery in ≥ 85-year-old patients. Surgeons should perform instrumentation even in the patients over 85 years with ASA class 3 or less.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA-PS classification; Comorbidities; Decompression; Elderly old patients; Instrumentation surgery; Perioperative complications

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532114     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3875-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Don Poldermans; Jeroen J Bax; Eric Boersma; Stefan De Hert; Erik Eeckhout; Gerry Fowkes; Bulent Gorenek; Michael G Hennerici; Bernard Iung; Malte Kelm; Keld Per Kjeldsen; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Paolo Pelosi; François Philippe; Luc Pierard; Piotr Ponikowski; Jean-Paul Schmid; Olav F M Sellevold; Rosa Sicari; Greet Van den Berghe; Frank Vermassen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Failure of conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  S Shabat; Y Folman; Y Leitner; B Fredman; R Gepstein
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 3.  Complications in spine surgery.

Authors:  Rani Nasser; Sanjay Yadla; Mitchell G Maltenfort; James S Harrop; D Greg Anderson; Alexander R Vaccaro; Ashwini D Sharan; John K Ratliff
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-08

4.  Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Hideki Nagashima; Toshiyuki Dokai; Hirokazu Hashiguchi; Hiroyuki Ishii; Yasuhiro Kameyama; Yuji Katae; Yasuo Morio; Tsugutake Morishita; Masaaki Murata; Yoshiro Nanjo; Toshiaki Takahashi; Atsushi Tanida; Shinji Tanishima; Koji Yamane; Ryota Teshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Correlation of higher preoperative American Society of Anesthesiology grade and increased morbidity and mortality rates in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Ming G Fu; Justin S Smith; David W Polly; Christopher P Ames; Sigurd H Berven; Joseph H Perra; Richard E McCarthy; D Raymond Knapp; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-02-04

7.  Obesity and spine surgery: reassessment based on a prospective evaluation of perioperative complications in elective degenerative thoracolumbar procedures.

Authors:  Sanjay Yadla; Jennifer Malone; Peter G Campbell; Mitchell G Maltenfort; James S Harrop; Ashwini D Sharan; Alexander R Vaccaro; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Mary Beth Hamel; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Jennifer Daley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Intraoperative cardiac arrests in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and survival outcome.

Authors:  Sumeet Goswami; Joanne E Brady; Desmond A Jordan; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Spine surgery in geriatric patients: Sometimes unnecessary, too much, or too little.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-12-31
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Perioperative adverse events in adult and pediatric spine surgery: A prospective cohort analysis of 364 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Alessio Lovi; Enrico Gallazzi; Fabio Galbusera; Alessandra Colombini; Fabrizio Pregliasco; Giuseppe Peretti; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-12-29

2.  Clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; S Oikonomidis; R Hartwig; R Gramse; C Meyer; M J Scheyerer; C Hofstetter; P Eysel; J Bredow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.