| Literature DB >> 29532021 |
Yao Liu1,2, Zachariah A Page1, Dongming Zhou3, Volodimyr V Duzhko1, Kevin R Kittilstved3, Todd Emrick1, Thomas P Russell1,2.
Abstract
While perovskite solar cells have invigorated the photovoltaic research community due to their excellent power conversion efficiencies (PCEs), these devices notably suffer from poor stability. To address this crucial issue, a solution-processable organic chemical inhibition layer (OCIL) was integrated into perovskite solar cells, resulting in improved device stability and a maximum PCE of 16.3%. Photoenhanced self-doping of the fulleropyrrolidine mixture in the interlayers afforded devices that were advantageously insensitive to OCIL thickness, ranging from 4 to 190 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) indicated that the fulleropyrrolidine mixture improved device stability by stabilizing the metal electrode and trapping ionic defects (i.e., I-) that originate from the perovskite active layer. Moreover, degraded devices were rejuvenated by repeatedly peeling away and replacing the OCIL/Ag electrode, and this repeel and replace process resulted in further improvement to device stability with minimal variation of device efficiency.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29532021 PMCID: PMC5833006 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Cent Sci ISSN: 2374-7943 Impact factor: 14.553
Figure 1Top: 1H NMR spectrum of C60/C70-N in CDCl3, showing aromatic protons from C60-N (blue squares) and C70-N (green circles). Bottom: Device structure and composition for the perovskite-based photovoltaics studied.
Figure 2Photovoltaic performance. (A) J–V curves of the optimized perovskite devices with and without a C60/C70-N interlayer; (B) the corresponding EQE profile of the optimal device; (C) device performance as a function of interlayer thickness (error represents ±1 standard deviation from 8 devices; devices for OCIL thickness measurements were prepared at the same time using the same batch of perovskite precursors); (D) normalized PCE of devices with different interlayer thicknesses as a function of time under MPP tracking tests.
Metrics for Best Performing Device from Figure A and the Device Metrics for Figure C
| OCIL thickness (nm) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| best device | 0.95 | 22.6 | 75.8 | 16.3 |
| 4 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 20.49 ± 0.66 | 68.23 ± 3.81 | 12.72 ± 1.59 |
| 12 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 20.96 ± 1.54 | 71.03 ± 3.23 | 14.35 ± 1.28 |
| 24 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 21.22 ± 0.57 | 72.44 ± 2.47 | 14.82 ± 0.73 |
| 60 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 22.64 ± 0.47 | 72.37 ± 1.65 | 15.37 ± 0.51 |
| 93 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 20.21 ± 0.58 | 69.94 ± 1.46 | 13.44 ± 0.56 |
| 190 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 18.33 ± 0.37 | 67.39 ± 2.79 | 11.92 ± 0.45 |
Figure 3(A) XPS measurements of the Ag substrate with and without a C60/C70-N interlayer: high resolution Ag3d XPS spectra; (B) UPS measurements of Ag substrate with and without a C60/C70-N interlayer; (C) EPR spectra of C60/C70-N in toluene (∼10 mg/mL, 200 μL); (D) I–V measurements of C60/C70-N thin film coated on parallel gold electrodes; (E) in situ photocharging EPR measurement; (F) photoswitching of a C60/C70-N thin film coated on parallel gold electrodes with a constant bias of 20 V.
Figure 4Repeel and replace process. Left: schematic of “peel and replace”. Right: a photograph of the electrode peeling process performed simply by hand using Scotch tape.
Figure 5Applying repeel and replace to photovoltaic devices. (A) Three cycles of measurements based on 10 perovskite devices. (B) Sample device recovery measurement in three continuous cycles of MPP tracking tests (Vmax = 0.8 V). Jmax values from the MPP tracking tests are shown in Figure S11.