Literature DB >> 29531635

Hydrodynamic mobility of confined polymeric particles, vesicles, and cancer cells in a square microchannel.

Shamim M Ahmmed1, Naureen S Suteria1, Valeria Garbin2, Siva A Vanapalli1.   

Abstract

The transport of deformable objects, including polymer particles, vesicles, and cells, has been a subject of interest for several decades where the majority of experimental and theoretical studies have been focused on circular tubes. Due to advances in microfluidics, there is a need to study the transport of individual deformable particles in rectangular microchannels where corner flows can be important. In this study, we report measurements of hydrodynamic mobility of confined polymeric particles, vesicles, and cancer cells in a linear microchannel with a square cross-section. Our operating conditions are such that the mobility is measured as a function of geometric confinement over the range 0.3 < λ < 1.5 and at specified particle Reynolds numbers that are within 0.1 < Rep < 2.5. The experimental mobility data of each of these systems is compared with the circular-tube theory of Hestroni, Haber, and Wacholder [J. Fluid Mech. 41, 689-705 (1970)] with modifications made for a square cross-section. For polymeric particles, we find that the mobility data agrees well over a large confinement range with the theory but under predicts for vesicles. The mobility of vesicles is higher in a square channel than in a circular tube, and does not depend significantly on membrane mechanical properties. The mobility of cancer cells is in good agreement with the theory up to λ ≈ 0.8, after which it deviates. Comparison of the mobility data of the three systems reveals that cancer cells have higher mobility than rigid particles but lower than vesicles, suggesting that the cell membrane frictional properties are in between a solid-like interface and a fluid bilayer. We explain further the differences in the mobility of the three systems by considering their shape deformation and surface flow on the interface. The results of this study may find potential applications in drug delivery and biomedical diagnostics.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29531635      PMCID: PMC5812743          DOI: 10.1063/1.5018620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  33 in total

1.  Microfluidic micropipette aspiration for measuring the deformability of single cells.

Authors:  Quan Guo; Sunyoung Park; Hongshen Ma
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Microfluidics-based assessment of cell deformability.

Authors:  Andrea Adamo; Armon Sharei; Luigi Adamo; ByungKun Lee; Shirley Mao; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Entropy-driven tension and bending elasticity in condensed-fluid membranes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1990-04-23       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  A microfluidic device for continuous, real time blood plasma separation.

Authors:  Sung Yang; Akif Undar; Jeffrey D Zahn
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  High heterogeneity of plasma membrane microfluidity in multidrug-resistant cancer cells.

Authors:  Céline Boutin; Yann Roche; Christine Millot; Régis Deturche; Pascal Royer; Michel Manfait; Jéro Me Plain; Pierre Jeannesson; Jean-Marc Millot; Rodolphe Jaffiol
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  A model for red blood cell motion in glycocalyx-lined capillaries.

Authors:  T W Secomb; R Hsu; A R Pries
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-03

7.  A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Armon Sharei; Janet Zoldan; Andrea Adamo; Woo Young Sim; Nahyun Cho; Emily Jackson; Shirley Mao; Sabine Schneider; Min-Joon Han; Abigail Lytton-Jean; Pamela A Basto; Siddharth Jhunjhunwala; Jungmin Lee; Daniel A Heller; Jeon Woong Kang; George C Hartoularos; Kwang-Soo Kim; Daniel G Anderson; Robert Langer; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Hydrodynamic lift of vesicles and red blood cells in flow--from Fåhræus & Lindqvist to microfluidic cell sorting.

Authors:  Thomas M Geislinger; Thomas Franke
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.984

9.  Capillary blood flow. II. Deformable model cells in tube flow.

Authors:  S P Sutera; V Seshadri; P A Croce; R M Hochmuth
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Molecular portraits of epithelial, mesenchymal, and hybrid States in lung adenocarcinoma and their relevance to survival.

Authors:  Mark J Schliekelman; Ayumu Taguchi; Jun Zhu; Xudong Dai; Jaime Rodriguez; Muge Celiktas; Qing Zhang; Alice Chin; Chee-Hong Wong; Hong Wang; Lisa McFerrin; Suhaida A Selamat; Chenchen Yang; Evan M Kroh; Kavita S Garg; Carmen Behrens; Adi F Gazdar; Ite A Laird-Offringa; Muneesh Tewari; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jean P Thiery; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of non-Newtonian power law rheology on inertial migration of particles in channel flow.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Jianzhong Lin; Dongmei Chen; Xiaoke Ku
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Multi-sample deformability cytometry of cancer cells.

Authors:  Shamim M Ahmmed; Swastika S Bithi; Adity A Pore; Noshin Mubtasim; Caroline Schuster; Lauren S Gollahon; Siva A Vanapalli
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2018-06-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.