T Steuber1, C Jilg2, P Tennstedt1, A De Bruycker3, D Tilki4, K Decaestecker5, T Zilli6, B A Jereczek-Fossa7, U Wetterauer2, A L Grosu8, W Schultze-Seemann2, H Heinzer1, M Graefen1, A Morlacco9, R J Karnes9, P Ost10. 1. Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 2. Department of Urology, Albert Ludwig University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University-Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 6. Department of Radiotherapy, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. 7. University of Milan and European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Ludwig University hospital, Freiburg, Germany. 9. Department of Urology, Mayo-Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 10. Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: piet.ost@ugent.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a biochemical failure following primary multimodality treatment (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy) relapse in the nodes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a matched-case analysis in men with lymph node recurrent PCa comparing standard of care (SOC) with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PCa patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression following multimodality treatment were included in this retrospective multi-institutional analysis. INTERVENTION: The SOC cohort (n=1816) received immediate or delayed androgen deprivation therapy administered at PSA progression. The MDT cohort (n=263) received either salvage lymph node dissection (n=166) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (n=97) at PSA progression to a positron emission tomography-detected nodal recurrence. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint, cancer-specific survival (CSS), was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a median follow-up of 70 (interquartile range: 48-98) mo, MDT was associated with an improved CSS on univariate (p=0.029) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.64) adjusted for the year of radical prostatectomy (RP), age at RP, PSA at RP, time from RP to PSA progression, Gleason score, surgical margin status, pT- and pN-stage. In total, 659 men were matched (3:1 ratio). The 5-yr CSS was 98.6% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6) and 95.7% (95% CI: 93.2-97.3) for MDT and SOC, respectively (p=0.005, log-rank). The main limitations of our study are its retrospective design and lack of standardization of systemic treatment in the SOC cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MDT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa improves CSS as compared with SOC. These retrospective data from a multi-institutional pooled analysis should be considered as hypothesis-generating and inform future randomized trials in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate cancer patients experiencing a lymph node recurrence might benefit from local treatments directed at these lymph nodes.
BACKGROUND: Most prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a biochemical failure following primary multimodality treatment (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy) relapse in the nodes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a matched-case analysis in men with lymph node recurrent PCa comparing standard of care (SOC) with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PCa patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression following multimodality treatment were included in this retrospective multi-institutional analysis. INTERVENTION: The SOC cohort (n=1816) received immediate or delayed androgen deprivation therapy administered at PSA progression. The MDT cohort (n=263) received either salvage lymph node dissection (n=166) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (n=97) at PSA progression to a positron emission tomography-detected nodal recurrence. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint, cancer-specific survival (CSS), was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a median follow-up of 70 (interquartile range: 48-98) mo, MDT was associated with an improved CSS on univariate (p=0.029) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.64) adjusted for the year of radical prostatectomy (RP), age at RP, PSA at RP, time from RP to PSA progression, Gleason score, surgical margin status, pT- and pN-stage. In total, 659 men were matched (3:1 ratio). The 5-yr CSS was 98.6% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6) and 95.7% (95% CI: 93.2-97.3) for MDT and SOC, respectively (p=0.005, log-rank). The main limitations of our study are its retrospective design and lack of standardization of systemic treatment in the SOC cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MDT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa improves CSS as compared with SOC. These retrospective data from a multi-institutional pooled analysis should be considered as hypothesis-generating and inform future randomized trials in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY:Prostate cancerpatients experiencing a lymph node recurrence might benefit from local treatments directed at these lymph nodes.
Authors: C Leigh Moyer; Ryan Phillips; Matthew P Deek; Noura Radwan; Ashley E Ross; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Diane Reyes; Jean Wright; Stephanie A Terezakis; Daniel Y Song; Curtiland DeVille; Patrick C Walsh; Theodore L DeWeese; Michael Carducci; Edward M Schaeffer; Kenneth J Pienta; Mario Eisenberger; Phuoc T Tran Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Chukwuka Eze; Minglun Li; Paul Rogowski; Christian Schaefer; Christian Stief; Alexander Buchner; Constantinos Zamboglou; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ute Ganswindt; Clemens Cyran; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Harun Ilhan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Francesco A Mistretta; Stefano Luzzago; Andrea Conti; Elena Verri; Giulia Marvaso; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Michele Catellani; Ettore Di Trapani; Gabriele Cozzi; Roberto Bianchi; Matteo Ferro; Giovanni Cordima; Antonio Brescia; Maria Cossu Rocca; Vincenzo Mirone; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Franco Nolè; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Simon Kirste; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Christoph Henkenberens; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Marco M E Vogel; Jessica Becker; Constantinos Zamboglou; Irene Burger; Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bartenstein; Juri Ruf; Christian la Fougère; Matthias Eiber; Hans Christiansen; Stephanie E Combs; Arndt-Christian Müller; Claus Belka; Matthias Guckenberger; Anca-Ligia Grosu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 6.244