Literature DB >> 29530314

Requests for post-registration studies (PRS), patients follow-up in actual practice: Changes in the role of databases.

Driss Berdaï1, Florence Thomas-Delecourt2, Karine Szwarcensztein3, Anne d'Andon4, Cécile Collignon5, Denis Comet6, Cécile Déal7, Benoît Dervaux8, Anne-Françoise Gaudin9, Véronique Lamarque-Garnier10, Philippe Lechat11, Sébastien Marque12, Philippe Maugendre13, Hubert Méchin14, Nicholas Moore15, Gaëlle Nachbaur16, Mathieu Robain17, Christophe Roussel18, André Tanti19, Frantz Thiessard20.   

Abstract

Early market access of health products is associated with a larger number of requests for information by the health authorities. Compared with these expectations, the growing expansion of health databases represents an opportunity for responding to questions raised by the authorities. The computerised nature of the health system provides numerous sources of data, and first and foremost medical/administrative databases such as the French National Inter-Scheme Health Insurance Information System (SNIIRAM) database. These databases, although developed for other purposes, have already been used for many years with regard to post-registration studies (PRS). The use thereof will continue to increase with the recent creation of the French National Health Data System (SNDS [2016 health system reform law]). At the same time, other databases are available in France, offering an illustration of "product use under actual practice conditions" by patients and health professionals (cohorts, specific registries, data warehouses, etc.). Based on a preliminary analysis of requests for PRS, approximately two-thirds appeared to have found at least a partial response in existing databases. Using these databases has a number of disadvantages, but also numerous advantages, which are listed. In order to facilitate access and optimise their use, it seemed important to draw up recommendations aiming to facilitate these developments and guarantee the conditions for their technical validity. The recommendations drawn up notably include the need for measures aiming to promote the visibility of research conducted on databases in the field of PRS. Moreover, it seemed worthwhile to promote the interoperability of health data warehouses, to make it possible to match information originating from field studies with information originating from databases, and to develop and share algorithms aiming to identify criteria of interest (proxies). Methodological documents, such as the French National Authority for Health (HAS) recommendations on "Les études post-inscription sur les technologies de santé (médicaments, dispositifs médicaux et actes). Principes et méthodes" [Post-registration studies on health technologies (medicinal products, medical devices and procedures). Principles and methods] should be updated to incorporate these developments.
Copyright © 2018 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actual practice data; Databases; Health technologies assessment; Pharmacoepidemiology; Post-registration study; SNDS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29530314     DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  1 in total

1.  The ongoing French metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cohort: the example-based methodology of the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME).

Authors:  David Pérol; Mathieu Robain; Patrick Arveux; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Emmanuel Chamorey; Bernard Asselain; Delphine Berchery; Sophie Gourgou; Mathias Breton; Stéphanie Delaine-Clisant; Muriel Mons; Véronique Diéras; Matthieu Carton; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Lilian Laborde; Carine Laurent; Agnès Loeb; Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier; Damien Parent; Geneviève Perrocheau; Loïc Campion; Michel Velten; Christian Cailliot; Monia Ezzalfani; Gaëtane Simon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.