Literature DB >> 29530109

The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.

Timothy C Bates1, Brion S Maher2, Sarah E Medland3, Kerrie McAloney3, Margaret J Wright4, Narelle K Hansell4, Kenneth S Kendler5, Nicholas G Martin3, Nathan A Gillespie5.   

Abstract

Research on environmental and genetic pathways to complex traits such as educational attainment (EA) is confounded by uncertainty over whether correlations reflect effects of transmitted parental genes, causal family environments, or some, possibly interactive, mixture of both. Thus, an aggregate of thousands of alleles associated with EA (a polygenic risk score; PRS) may tap parental behaviors and home environments promoting EA in the offspring. New methods for unpicking and determining these causal pathways are required. Here, we utilize the fact that parents pass, at random, 50% of their genome to a given offspring to create independent scores for the transmitted alleles (conventional EA PRS) and a parental score based on alleles not transmitted to the offspring (EA VP_PRS). The formal effect of non-transmitted alleles on offspring attainment was tested in 2,333 genotyped twins for whom high-quality measures of EA, assessed at age 17 years, were available, and whose parents were also genotyped. Four key findings were observed. First, the EA PRS and EA VP_PRS were empirically independent, validating the virtual-parent design. Second, in this family-based design, children's own EA PRS significantly predicted their EA (β = 0.15), ruling out stratification confounds as a cause of the association of attainment with the EA PRS. Third, parental EA PRS predicted the SES environment parents provided to offspring (β = 0.20), and parental SES and offspring EA were significantly associated (β = 0.33). This would suggest that the EA PRS is at least as strongly linked to social competence as it is to EA, leading to higher attained SES in parents and, therefore, a higher experienced SES for children. In a full structural equation model taking account of family genetic relatedness across multiple siblings the non-transmitted allele effects were estimated at similar values; but, in this more complex model, confidence intervals included zero. A test using the forthcoming EA3 PRS may clarify this outcome. The virtual-parent method may be applied to clarify causality in other phenotypes where observational evidence suggests parenting may moderate expression of other outcomes, for instance in psychiatry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  educational attainment; non-transmitted genotype; parental environment; virtual-parent design

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29530109     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2018.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  47 in total

1.  Separating Measured Genetic and Environmental Effects: Evidence Linking Parental Genotype and Adopted Child Outcomes.

Authors:  Benjamin W Domingue; Jason Fletcher
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Modeling Parent-Specific Genetic Nurture in Families with Missing Parental Genotypes: Application to Birthweight and BMI.

Authors:  Justin D Tubbs; Liang-Dar Hwang; Justin Luong; David M Evans; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Genetics of nurture: A test of the hypothesis that parents' genetics predict their observed caregiving.

Authors:  Jasmin Wertz; Jay Belsky; Terrie E Moffitt; Daniel W Belsky; HonaLee Harrington; Reut Avinun; Richie Poulton; Sandhya Ramrakha; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-03-28

4.  Multi-Polygenic Score Approach to Identifying Individual Vulnerabilities Associated With the Risk of Exposure to Bullying.

Authors:  Tabea Schoeler; Shing Wan Choi; Frank Dudbridge; Jessie Baldwin; Lauren Duncan; Charlotte M Cecil; Esther Walton; Essi Viding; Eamon McCrory; Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 5.  Using genetics for social science.

Authors:  K Paige Harden; Philipp D Koellinger
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-05-11

6.  Interpreting Behavior Genetic Models: Seven Developmental Processes to Understand.

Authors:  Daniel A Briley; Jonathan Livengood; Jaime Derringer; Elliot M Tucker-Drob; R Chris Fraley; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Associations between an educational attainment polygenic score with educational attainment in an African American sample.

Authors:  Jill A Rabinowitz; Sally I-C Kuo; William Felder; Rashelle J Musci; Amie Bettencourt; Kelly Benke; Danielle Y Sisto; Emily Smail; George Uhl; Brion S Maher; Anthony Kouzis; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  The Role of Emergence in Genetically Informed Relationships Research: A Methodological Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica E Salvatore; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  The Earliest Origins of Genetic Nurture: The Prenatal Environment Mediates the Association Between Maternal Genetics and Child Development.

Authors:  Emma Armstrong-Carter; Sam Trejo; Liam J B Hill; Kirsty L Crossley; Dan Mason; Benjamin W Domingue
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-02

10.  Commentary on Holst et al. (2020): Genetically informative research can clarify mechanisms linking non-intact family structure and alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Jessica E Salvatore
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.