Adam Bryant Miller1, Katie A McLaughlin2, Daniel S Busso3, Stephanie Brueck4, Matthew Peverill2, Margaret A Sheridan5. 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: adam.miller@unc.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 3. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 4. School of Social Work, Boston College, Newton, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research on the neural correlates associated with risk for suicidal ideation (SI) has been limited, particularly in one increasingly at-risk group-adolescents. Previous research with adolescents indicates that poor emotion regulation skills are linked with SI, but these studies have not previously examined neural activation in service of emotion regulation between those with and without SI histories. METHODS: Here we examine whether SI is associated with neural responses during an emotion regulation functional magnetic resonance imaging task in a group of adolescents (N = 49) 13 to 20 years of age (mean = 16.95). RESULTS: While there were no differences between youths with and without SI in self-reported emotional responses to negative pictures, youths with SI activated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex more than youths without SI on trials in which they attempted to regulate their emotional responses compared with trials in which they passively viewed negative pictures. In contrast, during passive viewing of negative stimuli, youths with SI activated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and cerebellum less than same-age control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings were robust to control subjects for depression and adversity exposure and are consistent with the idea that youths with SI have disrupted emotion regulation, potentially related to differences in recruitment of top-down control regions. In contrast, youths without SI activated regions implicated in emotion regulation even when not directed to effortfully control their emotional response. This is the first study to examine neural function during emotion regulation as a potential neural correlate of risk for SI in adolescents.
BACKGROUND: Research on the neural correlates associated with risk for suicidal ideation (SI) has been limited, particularly in one increasingly at-risk group-adolescents. Previous research with adolescents indicates that poor emotion regulation skills are linked with SI, but these studies have not previously examined neural activation in service of emotion regulation between those with and without SI histories. METHODS: Here we examine whether SI is associated with neural responses during an emotion regulation functional magnetic resonance imaging task in a group of adolescents (N = 49) 13 to 20 years of age (mean = 16.95). RESULTS: While there were no differences between youths with and without SI in self-reported emotional responses to negative pictures, youths with SI activated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex more than youths without SI on trials in which they attempted to regulate their emotional responses compared with trials in which they passively viewed negative pictures. In contrast, during passive viewing of negative stimuli, youths with SI activated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and cerebellum less than same-age control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings were robust to control subjects for depression and adversity exposure and are consistent with the idea that youths with SI have disrupted emotion regulation, potentially related to differences in recruitment of top-down control regions. In contrast, youths without SI activated regions implicated in emotion regulation even when not directed to effortfully control their emotional response. This is the first study to examine neural function during emotion regulation as a potential neural correlate of risk for SI in adolescents.
Authors: Jennifer A Y Johnston; Fei Wang; Jie Liu; Benjamin N Blond; Amanda Wallace; Jiacheng Liu; Linda Spencer; Elizabeth T Cox Lippard; Kirstin L Purves; Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger; Eric Hermes; Brian Pittman; Sheng Zhang; Robert King; Andrés Martin; Maria A Oquendo; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Matteo Giletta; Paul D Hastings; Karen D Rudolph; Daniel J Bauer; Matthew K Nock; Mitchell J Prinstein Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2016-12-29
Authors: Krzysztof Gorgolewski; Christopher D Burns; Cindee Madison; Dav Clark; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Michael L Waskom; Satrajit S Ghosh Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Lars Mehlum; Anita J Tørmoen; Maria Ramberg; Egil Haga; Lien M Diep; Stine Laberg; Bo S Larsson; Barbara H Stanley; Alec L Miller; Anne M Sund; Berit Grøholt Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: W Myung; C E Han; M Fava; D Mischoulon; G I Papakostas; J-Y Heo; K W Kim; S T Kim; D J H Kim; D K Kim; S W Seo; J-K Seong; H J Jeon Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Caroline W Oppenheimer; Jennifer S Silk; Kyung Hwa Lee; Ronald E Dahl; Erika Forbes; Neal Ryan; Cecile D Ladouceur Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2020-04
Authors: Alexandra M Rodman; Jessica L Jenness; David G Weissman; Daniel S Pine; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Adam Bryant Miller; Mitchell J Prinstein; Emily Munier; Laura S Machlin; Margaret A Sheridan Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Jessica L Jenness; Matthew Peverill; Adam Bryant Miller; Charlotte Heleniak; Madeline M Robertson; Kelly A Sambrook; Margaret A Sheridan; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 7.723