Literature DB >> 29529191

Overview of mitral regurgitation in Europe: results from the European Registry of mitral regurgitation (EuMiClip).

Juan Manuel Monteagudo Ruiz1, Maurizio Galderisi2, Agostino Buonauro2, Luigi Badano3, Patrizia Aruta3, Martin J Swaans4, Laura Sanchis4, Antti Saraste5, Mark Monaghan6, Konstantinos C Theodoropoulos6, Michael Papitsas6, Noah Liel-Cohen7, Sergio Kobal7, Mojca Bervar8, Boštjan Berlot8, Gerasimos Filippatos9, Ignatios Ikonomidis9, Spyridon Katsanos9, Felix C Tanner10, Daniela Cassani10, Francesco F Faletra11, Laura A Leo11, Amparo Martinez12, Javier Matabuena13, Antonio Grande-Trillo13, David Alonso-Rodriguez14, Dolores Mesa15, Teresa Gonzalez-Alujas16, Marta Sitges17, Fernando Carrasco-Chinchilla18, Chi Hion Li19, Covadonga Fernandez-Golfin1, José Luis Zamorano1,20.   

Abstract

Aims: To determine the prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography and to examine the distribution of primary and secondary MR. Methods and results: All patients undergoing an echocardiographic study in 19 European centres within a 3-month period were prospectively included. MR assessment was performed as recommended by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). MR was classified according to mechanism as primary or secondary and aetiologies were reported. A total of 63 463 consecutive echocardiographic studies were reviewed. Any degree of MR was described in 15 501 patients. Concomitant valve disease of at least moderate grade was present in 28.5% of patients, being tricuspid regurgitation the most prevalent. In the subgroup of moderate and severe MR (n = 3309), 55% of patients had primary MR and 30% secondary MR. Both mechanisms were described in 14% of the studies. According to Carpentier's classification, 26.7% of MR were classified as I, 19.9% of MR as II, 22.4% of MR as IIIa, and 31.1% of MR as IIIb.
Conclusion: To date, this is the largest echocardiography-based study to analyse the prevalence and aetiology distribution of MR in Europe. The burden of secondary MR was higher than previously described, representing 30% of patients with significant MR. In our environment, degenerative disease is the most common aetiology of primary MR (60%), whereas ischaemic is the most common aetiology of secondary MR (51%). Up to 70% of patients with severe primary MR may have a Class I indication for surgery. However, the optimal therapeutic approach for secondary MR remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29529191     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Steffen Bargenda; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; Sophie Tkebuchava; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Transcatheter mitral valve intervention.

Authors:  Rea Ganatra; Robert Smith
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-30

3.  Pattern of Cardiac Diseases and Co-Existing Morbidities Among Newly Registered Cardiac Patients in an Adult Cardiac Referral Clinic of Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern-Ethiopia.

Authors:  Sisay Tesfaye; Mekdes Shifeta; Agete Tadewos Hirigo
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 4.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapy: Defining the Patient Who Will Benefit.

Authors:  Marvin H Eng; Dee Dee Wang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Comparison of mitral annulus geometry between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation: implications for transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

Authors:  Patrizia Aruta; Denisa Muraru; Andrada Camelia Guta; Sorina Mihaila; Niccolò Ruozi; Chiara Palermo; Basma Elnagar; Sabino Iliceto; Luigi P Badano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.062

6.  Phenotyping progression of secondary mitral regurgitation in chronic systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Henrike Arfsten; Philipp E Bartko; Noemi Pavo; Gregor Heitzinger; Julia Mascherbauer; Christian Hengstenberg; Martin Hülsmann; Georg Goliasch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.686

7.  Presentation and outcomes of mitral valve surgery in France in the recent era: a nationwide perspective.

Authors:  David Messika-Zeitoun; Pascal Candolfi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Ian G Burwash; Vincent Chan; Jean-Francois Philippon; Jean-Manuel Toussaint; Partrick Verta; Ted E Feldman; Bernard Iung; David Glineur; Jean-Francois Obadia; Alec Vahanian; Thierry Mesana
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-08

8.  Global longitudinal strain is a hallmark of cardiac damage in mitral regurgitation: the Italian arm of the European Registry of mitral regurgitation (EuMiClip).

Authors:  Ciro Santoro; Maurizio Galderisi; Roberta Esposito; Agostino Buonauro; Juan Manuel Monteagudo; Regina Sorrentino; Maria Lembo; Covadonga Fernandez-Golfin; Bruno Trimarco; Josè Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Right ventricular mechanical pattern in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: a predictor of post-operative dysfunction?

Authors:  Márton Tokodi; Endre Németh; Bálint K Lakatos; Erika Kispál; Zoltán Tősér; Levente Staub; Kristóf Rácz; Ádám Soltész; Szabolcs Szigeti; Tamás Varga; János Gál; Béla Merkely; Attila Kovács
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-26

10.  A Nationwide Survey of Surgical Treatment for Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation.

Authors:  Akihiro Masuzawa; Tomomitsu Takagi; Hirokuni Arai; Goro Matsumiya; Shuichiro Takanashi; Hitoshi Yaku; Tatsuhiko Komiya; Yoshiro Matsui; Satoru Wakasa; Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.520

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.