Laura M Keohane1, Momotazur Rahman2, Kali S Thomas2,3, Amal N Trivedi2,3. 1. Department of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports for Vulnerable Veterans, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a federal regulation effective in 2011 that limited how much that Medicare Advantage (MA) plans could charge for the first 20 days of care in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). DESIGN: Difference-in-differences retrospective analysis comparing SNF utilization trends from 2008-2012. SETTING: Select MA plans. PARTICIPANTS: Members of 27 plans with mandatory cost sharing reductions (n=132,000) and members of 21 plans without such reductions (n=138,846). MEASUREMENTS: Mean monthly number of SNF admissions and days per 1,000 members; annual proportion of MA enrollees exiting the plan. RESULTS: In plans with mandated cost sharing reductions, cost sharing for the first 20 days of SNF care decreased from an average of $2,039 in 2010 to $992 in 2011. In adjusted analyses, plans with mandated cost-sharing reductions averaged 158.1 SNF days (95% confidence interval (CI)=153.2-163.1 days) per 1,000 members per month before the cost sharing cap. This measure increased by 14.3 days (95% CI=3.8-24.8 days, p=0.009) in the 2 years after cap implementation. However, increases in SNF utilization did not significantly differ between plans with and without mandated cost-sharing reductions (adjusted between-group difference: 7.1 days per 1,000 members, 95% CI=-6.5-20.8, p=.30). Disenrollment patterns did not change after the cap took effect. CONCLUSIONS: When a federal regulation designed to protect MA members from high out-of-pocket costs for postacute care took effect, the use of SNF services did not change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a federal regulation effective in 2011 that limited how much that Medicare Advantage (MA) plans could charge for the first 20 days of care in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). DESIGN: Difference-in-differences retrospective analysis comparing SNF utilization trends from 2008-2012. SETTING: Select MA plans. PARTICIPANTS: Members of 27 plans with mandatory cost sharing reductions (n=132,000) and members of 21 plans without such reductions (n=138,846). MEASUREMENTS: Mean monthly number of SNF admissions and days per 1,000 members; annual proportion of MA enrollees exiting the plan. RESULTS: In plans with mandated cost sharing reductions, cost sharing for the first 20 days of SNF care decreased from an average of $2,039 in 2010 to $992 in 2011. In adjusted analyses, plans with mandated cost-sharing reductions averaged 158.1 SNF days (95% confidence interval (CI)=153.2-163.1 days) per 1,000 members per month before the cost sharing cap. This measure increased by 14.3 days (95% CI=3.8-24.8 days, p=0.009) in the 2 years after cap implementation. However, increases in SNF utilization did not significantly differ between plans with and without mandated cost-sharing reductions (adjusted between-group difference: 7.1 days per 1,000 members, 95% CI=-6.5-20.8, p=.30). Disenrollment patterns did not change after the cap took effect. CONCLUSIONS: When a federal regulation designed to protect MA members from high out-of-pocket costs for postacute care took effect, the use of SNF services did not change.
Authors: Laura M Keohane; Regina C Grebla; Momotazur Rahman; Dana B Mukamel; Yoojin Lee; Vincent Mor; Amal Trivedi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Elizabeth M Goldberg; Laura M Keohane; Vincent Mor; Amal N Trivedi; Hye-Young Jung; Momotazur Rahman Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Patience Moyo; Elliott Bosco; Barbara H Bardenheier; Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez; Robertus van Aalst; Ayman Chit; Stefan Gravenstein; Andrew R Zullo Journal: Vaccine Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.641